Distribution of delta and mu opioid receptor mRNA in rodent dorsal root ganglia neurons.

Primary afferents are responsible for transmitting signals produced by noxious stimuli from the periphery to the spinal cord. Mu and delta opioid receptors (MOP and DOP) have analgesic properties and are highly expressed in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons. In humans, spinal DOP is almost exclusively located on central terminals of DRG neurons, whereas in rodents, it is expressed both on presynaptic terminals and spinal neurons. In this study, we aimed to assess the distribution of MOP and DOP in the DRGs of mice and rats. Using in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence, we visualized MOP and DOP mRNA together with various neuronal markers. In rats and mice, we show that both receptors are expressed, albeit to different extents, in all types of neurons, namely, large and medium myelinated neurons (NF200-positive), small nonpeptidergic (IB4- or P2X3R-positive) and peptidergic C fibres (Tac1-positive). Overall, DOP mRNA was found to be mainly expressed in large and medium myelinated neurons, whereas MOP mRNA was mainly found in C fibres. The distribution of MOP and DOP, however, slightly differs between rats and mice, with a higher proportion of small nonpeptidergic C fibres expressing DOP mRNA in mice than in rats. We further found that neither morphine nor inflammation affected the distribution of the receptor mRNA. Because of their location, our results confirm that MOP and DOP have the potential to alleviate similar types of pain and that this effect could slightly differ between species.

Identification of the interactome of the DP1 receptor for Prostaglandin D2: Regulation of DP1 receptor signaling and trafficking by IQGAP1.

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms governing localization, trafficking and signaling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are critical in cell function. Protein-protein interactions are determinant in these processes. However, there are very little interacting proteins known to date for the DP1 receptor for prostaglandin D2. METHODS: We performed LC-MS/MS analyses of the DP1 receptor interactome in HEK293 cells. To functionally validate our LC-MS/MS data, we studied the implications of the interaction with the IQGAP1 scaffold protein in the trafficking and signaling of DP1. RESULTS: In addition to expected interacting proteins such as heterotrimeric G protein subunits, we identified proteins involved in signaling, trafficking, and folding localized in various cell compartments. Endogenous DP1-IQGAP1 co-immunoprecipitation was observed in colon cancer HT-29 cells. The interaction was augmented by DP1 agonist activation in HEK293 cells and GST-pulldown assays showed that IQGAP1 binds to intracellular loops 2 and 3 of DP1. Co-localization of the two proteins was observed by confocal microscopy at the cell periphery and in intracellular vesicles in the basal state. PGD2 treatment resulted in the redistribution of the DP1-IQGAP1 co-localization in the perinuclear vicinity. DP1 receptor internalization was promoted by overexpression of IQGAP1, while it was diminished by IQGAP1 knockdown with DsiRNAs. DP1-mediated ERK1/2 activation was augmented and sustained overtime by overexpression of IQGAP1 when compared to DP1 expressed alone. IQGAP1 knockdown decreased ERK1/2 activation by DP1 stimulation. Interestingly, ERK1/2 signaling by DP1 was increased when IQGAP2 was silenced, while it was impaired by IQGAP3 knockdown. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings define the putative DP1 interactome, a patho-physiologically important receptor, and validated the interaction with IQGAP1 in DP1 function. Our data also reveal that IQGAP proteins may differentially regulate GPCR signaling. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The identified putative DP1-interacting proteins open multiple lines of research in DP1 and GPCR biology in various cell compartments.