First Report of the Presence of Plum pox virus Rec Strain in Turkey.

Plum pox virus (PPV) is a detrimental virus in stone fruit crops. Six strains of PPV are recognized, one of which, PPV-Rec, represents a group of isolates sharing a unique founding recombination event (2). This strain has been reported only from central and south-central Europe. Its distribution is of interest because PPV-Rec is reported to induce only weak and transient symptoms in GF305 peach seedlings, which may complicate its detection using this widely used indicator (2). During a field trip in May 2006, a Japanese plum (Prunus salicina) tree showing leaf symptoms reminiscent of PPV infection was identified in Isparta, Turkey. A leaf sample tested by a serological lateral flow PPV Pocket Diagnostic (Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, UK) gave a weak positive reaction. The presence of PPV was confirmed by grafting onto GF305 peach and by PCR amplification and sequencing of a short P3M-P4b PCR product (1; positions 8446 to 8912 on PPV-BOR3; GenBank Accession No. AY028309) spanning the end of the NIb gene and the N-terminal hypervariable end of the coat protein gene. Comparison of the sequence obtained (GenBank Accession No. EF051630) with databases unambiguously identified the isolate as belonging to the Rec strain because it contained all the PPV-Rec specific mutations in the amplified region. In keeping with this identification, the symptoms observed in GF305 were very weak, consisting only of slight vein clearing on a few leaves. This is, to our knowledge, the first report of the presence of PPV-Rec in Turkey. References: (1) T. Candresse et al. Phytopathology 88:198, 1998. (2) M. Glasa et al. J. Gen. Virol. 85:2671, 2004.

Detection and serotyping of Mediterranean plum pox virus isolates by means of strain-specific monoclonal antibodies.

Plum pox virus (PPV) is a major threat to the expanding Mediterranean stone fruit industry. In order to control the plum pox disease it is of utmost importance to detect early PPV foci and to identify the PPV isolates involved. A survey was therefore carried out in Albania, Cyprus, Egypt, Greece, Italy and Turkey by a double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with the following monoclonal antibodies (MAbs): 5B (universal), 4DG5 (PPV-D-specific), AL (PPV-M-specific), TUV and AC (PPV-C-specific), and EA24 (PPV-El Amar-specific). A hundred and seventy Mediterranean PPV isolates were tested for strain type. PPV-M was detected in Albania, Cyprus, Greece, Italy, and Turkey; PPV-D was detected in Albania and Italy, whereas samples with natural mixtures of both strains were found in a couple of orchards in Albania. Seven PPV isolates from apricots in two Egyptian localities were recognized only by MAb EA24. In conclusion, DAS-ELISA with a combination of the universal MAb5B and the MAbs specific to the four PPV serotypes currently known (M, D, C and El Amar) is an efficient tool for a simple, sensitive and routine detection of PPV and discrimination of its serotypes.

Preventing intraperitoneal adhesions with ethyl pyruvate and hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose: a comparative study in an experimental model.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of ethyl pyruvate (EP) with that of hyaluronic acid+carboxymethyl cellulose (Seprafilm) for the prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions. Seprafilm has been shown to be effective in many experimental and clinical studies. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty rats were divided into three groups at random, and uterine horn abrasion was performed by laparotomy. One group received no treatment (control group), one group received a single intraperitoneal dose of EP 50mg/kg (EP group), and a 2×1-cm patch of Seprafilm was applied in the third group (Seprafilm group). All rats were killed 14 days after surgery. Macroscopic and histopathological evaluation were performed by a surgeon and a pathologist who were blinded to group allocation. Histopathologically, inflammation, fibroblastic activity, foreign body reaction, collagen proliferation, vascular proliferation, Masson-Trichrome score, matrix metalloproteinase-2 score and vascular endothelial growth factor score were studied. RESULTS: Median macroscopic intraperitoneal adhesion scores for the control, EP and Seprafilm groups were 2.8, 1.2 and 1.1, respectively. Multiple comparisons between groups showed a significant difference (p<0.05). In binary comparisons, significant differences were found between the control group and the EP group, and between the control group and the Seprafilm group (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the adhesion scores for the EP group and the Seprafilm group (p>0.05). After histopathological evaluation, significant differences in all parameters were found between the groups (p<0.05). In the paired comparison, significant differences were found between the control group and the EP group, and between the control group and the Seprafilm group (p<0.0167), but no significant difference was found between the EP group and the Seprafilm group (p>0.0167). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with the untreated control group, EP and Seprafilm were found to reduce the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions. No significant difference was found between EP and Seprafilm.