Nanotechnology in Kidney and Islet Transplantation: An Ongoing, Promising Field.

Organ transplantation has evolved rapidly in recent years as a reliable option for patients with end-stage organ failure. However, organ shortage, surgical risks, acute and chronic rejection reactions and long-term immunosuppressive drug applications and their inevitable side effects remain extremely challenging problems. The application of nanotechnology in medicine has proven highly successful and has unique advantages for diagnosing and treating diseases compared to conventional methods. The combination of nanotechnology and transplantation brings a new direction of thinking to transplantation medicine. In this article, we provide an overview of the application and progress of nanotechnology in kidney and islet transplantation, including nanotechnology for renal pre-transplantation preservation, artificial biological islets, organ imaging and drug delivery.

Integrative analysis of a necroptosis-related gene signature of clinical value and heterogeneity in diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), which is considered to be the most common subtype of lymphoma, is an aggressive tumor. Necroptosis, a novel type of programmed cell death, plays a bidirectional role in tumors and participates in the tumor microenvironment to influence tumor development. Targeting necroptosis is an intriguing direction, whereas its role in DLBCL needs to be further discussed. Methods: We obtained 17 DLBCL-associated necroptosis-related genes by univariate cox regression screening. We clustered in GSE31312 depending on their expressions of these 17 genes and analyzed the differences in clinical characteristics between different clusters. To investigate the differences in prognosis across distinct clusters, the Kaplan-Meier method was utilized. The variations in the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) between distinct necroptosis-related clusters were investigated via "ESTIMATE", "Cibersort" and single-sample geneset enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). Finally, we constructed a 6-gene prognostic model by lasso-cox regression and subsequently integrated clinical features to construct a prognostic nomogram. Results: Our analysis indicated stable but distinct mechanism of action of necroptosis in DLBCL. Based on necroptosis-related genes and cluster-associated genes, we identified three groups of patients with significant differences in prognosis, TME, and chemotherapy drug sensitivity. Analysis of immune infiltration in the TME showed that cluster 1, which displayed the best prognosis, was significantly infiltrated by natural killer T cells, dendritic cells, CD8+ T cells, and M1 macrophages. Cluster 3 presented M2 macrophage infiltration and the worst prognosis. Importantly, the prognostic model successfully differentiated high-risk from low-risk patients, and could forecast the survival of DLBCL patients. And the constructed nomogram demonstrated a remarkable capacity to forecast the survival time of DLBCL patients after incorporating predictive clinical characteristics. Conclusion: The different patterns of necroptosis explain its role in regulating the immune microenvironment of DLBCL and the response to R-CHOP treatment. Systematic assessment of necroptosis patterns in patients with DLBCL will help us understand the characteristics of tumor microenvironment cell infiltration and aid in the development of tailored therapy regimens.