Significance of the intraindividual variability of HLA IgG antibodies in renal disease patients observed with different beadsets monitored with two different secondary antibodies on a Luminex platform.

The accurate measurement of anti-HLA alloantibodies in transplant candidates is required for determining the degree of sensitization and for the listing of unacceptable antigens for organ allocation. Both the configuration of the HLA molecules coated on the beads and the nature of detection antibodies may impede assessment of the presence and strength of anti-HLA IgG- with the Luminex single-antigen-bead assay. Sera antibodies of the end-stage renal disease patients were compared using LIFECODES (LC) and LABScreen (LS) beadsets monitored with polyclonal-Fab (IgHPolyFab) and monoclonal-IgG (FcMonoIgG) second antibodies. Positive results at mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) > 500 (at serum dilution 1/10) were used to calculate panel reactive antibody (cPRA) levels. LS-beadsets are coated with monomeric variants in addition to intact HLA antigens with or without peptides, while LC-beadsets are devoid of monomeric variants and with lesser levels of peptide-free heterodimers. Consequently, IgG antibodies against both classes of HLA were reactive to more antigens with LS than with LC-beadsets. For both classes, MFIs were also frequently higher with LS than with LC. For HLA-I, MFIs were higher with IgHPolyFab than with FcMonoIgG with the exception of sera with MFIs > 5000 where they were comparable. For HLA-II, the reverse occurred, with significantly higher levels with FcMonoIgG regardless of the beadsets. The intraindividual variability observed between beadsets with two detection antibodies elucidates that antigens found as acceptable with one beadset may end up unacceptable with the other beadsets, with the possibility of denying potentially compatible transplants to candidates.

Frequency of HLA-DP-specific antibodies and a possible new cross-reacting group.

Clinical studies have demonstrated that HLA-DP-specific antibodies can be detrimental to a transplanted kidney. The number of patients affected is proportional to the frequency of DP antibodies. We determined the frequency of HLA-DP-specific antibodies en toto and in the absence of cross-reactive DR antibodies. Of 650 waitlisted renal patients, 271 (42%) were reactive with HLA-DP antigens in solid-phase immunoassays. Of these 271 sera, 58 (21%) were negative for reactivity with cross-reactive DR antigens, and 16 (5.9%) had no class II antibody other than DP. Eliminating sera containing DR cross-reactive antibodies reduced the frequency but not the overall strength of DP antibodies. Although most DP antibodies were not expected to yield a positive cytotoxicity crossmatch, 2 DP-specific antibodies yielded cytotoxic crossmatch tests with titers of >512. The occurrence of HLA-DP-specific antibody differed significantly between previously transplanted (62%) and nontransplanted (38%) patients, but no difference was observed among patients categorized by race or sex. One serum demonstrated strong cross-reactivity between DP and DRB1*01:03 in the absence of DR1 or DR11 reactivity. Sequence alignments were performed and a possible new cross-reactivity between DRB1*01:03 and DP2, DP9, DP10, DP13, DP16, and DP17 was defined. Two additional sera confirmed this cross-reactivity.