Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 138, 2023 Mar 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36882761

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The commitment of multidisciplinary teams in antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) is often inadequately considered, especially in surgical wards. We wanted to evaluate clinical, microbiological, and pharmacological outcomes before and after the implementation of an ASP in the Vascular Surgery ward of Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, a tertiary care hospital in Pavia, Italy. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental quality-improvement study. The antimicrobial stewardship activity was conducted twice a week for 12 months and consisted of both prospective audit and feedback of all the ongoing antimicrobial prescriptions by the infectious diseases' consultants and educational meetings for the healthcare workers of the Vascular Surgery ward. For comparison between the study periods, Student t test (Mann-Whitney test for skewed distributions) was used for quantitative variables (ANOVA or Kruskall-Wallis for > 2 groups respectively), and Pearson's chi-squared test (Fisher exact test where appropriate) for categorical variables. 2-tailed tests were used. P-value significance cut-off was 0.05. RESULTS: During the 12-month intervention period, among a total number of 698 patients, 186 prescriptions were revised, mostly leading to de-escalating an ongoing antimicrobial therapy (39, 20.97%). A statistically significant reduction in isolates of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p-value 0.003) and the absence of Clostridioides difficile infections were reported. No statistically significant changes were observed in terms of length of stay and all-cause in-hospital mortality. A significant decrease in the administration of carbapenems (p-value 0.01), daptomycin (p-value < 0.01) and linezolid (p-value 0.43) was registered. A significant reduction in antimicrobial costs was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a 12-month ASP brought significant clinical and economic results, highlighting the benefits of a multidisciplinary teamwork.


Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Humanos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Universidades , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares , Itália
2.
Vaccine ; 42(23): 126208, 2024 Oct 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39154513

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infection by SARS-CoV2 has become a challenge, especially for immunocompromised patients who show a weaker humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine. Tixagevimab+cilgavimab (Evusheld) is a combination of human monoclonal antibodies that can be used for pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent infection or disease by SARS-CoV2. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Evusheld by comparing an Exposed and an Unexposed group. STUDY DESIGN: Immunocompromised patients were enrolled in the Evusheld Group between March and September 2022. All patients had anti-spike IgG antibody levels <260 BAU/ml before administration of Evusheld. Blood samples for serological evaluations were collected, and anti-Spike antibodies were tested. For the Unexposed Group, a serologic test was performed at enrollment and a questionnaire was performed after 6 months. RESULTS: 43 patients received Evusheld pre-exposure prophylaxis and 45 patients not receiving Evusheld were enrolled in the Unexposed group. The median age was 59.0 years in the Evusheld group, and 63.0 in the unexposed group. In the Evusheld group, during the Omicron wave in Italy, 23.3% of subjects developed symptomatic infection compared to 42.2% in the unexposed group. A majority of infections was seen in male respect to female patients. No difference in length of infection between the groups was seen. Antibody level remained higher than the basal threshold at 180 days from enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Evusheld seems to reduce the rate of symptomatic infection in immunocompromised patients. Further data are required to determine whether this prophylaxis may have a longer-lasting effect over time.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/métodos , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/imunologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/sangue
3.
Cancer Med ; 12(19): 19530-19536, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37737046

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The gut microbiota (GM) can influence the pathogenesis of immune-mediated adverse events (irAEs). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can affect the integrity of GM, but their role in promoting irAEs is still poorly understood. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort study, the primary endpoint was the evaluation of the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) irAEs in cancer patients on PPIs (exposed) versus cancer patients who were not on PPIs (unexposed). RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty three patients' records (248 M/115F, median age 69) were reviewed. Twenty-three exposed patients (92%) developed GI irAEs while only two unexposed patients (8%) developed GI irAEs (hazard ratio [HR] 13.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.11-56.10, p < 0.000). This HR was confirmed after weighting for the propensity score (HR15.13 95% CI 3.22-71.03, p < 0.000). CONCLUSION: Chronic PPI use is associated with an increased risk of GI irAES.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Idoso , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/etiologia , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos
4.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 8: 684594, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34778280

RESUMO

Background: Tetanus infection remains a significant complication of wounds. Because most tetanus treatment guidelines rely on anamnestic data collected directly from patients, the congruence between anamnesis and laboratory evidence must be verified, especially in the elderly population. Aim: Assess, in both the geriatric population (>65) and the non-geriatric one, the reliability of anamnestic data for managing patients with tetanus-risk wounds, identified categories of populations most exposed to non-vaccination coverage, and assessed the agreement of the Tetanos Quick Stick (TQS) results with the therapy performed (administration of tetanus vaccine or immunoglobulin). Methods: In this retrospective single-center observational study, patients were asked their immunization status against tetanus vaccination. The decision to administer a vaccine or immunoglobulin was therefore clinical and based on anamnestic criteria. The TQS test was then given to patients who were unaware of their immunity status. Patients who thought they knew it but were not sure were given the TQS test to determine whether the anamnestic collection was supported by the test. The TQS test results were compared with the anamnestic data. Results: Most patients, geriatric and not geriatric, did not know their immune status. Among those who reported knowing their immune status, there was no agreement between the vaccine coverage declared by patients and the TQS test results (p < 0.001), mainly in geriatric patients but also in the control group. Elderly and women had significantly lower positive TQS test results (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant discrepancy (p < 0.001) between the therapy based on anamnestic data and the TQS test results. Conclusion: The reliability of anamnestic data for the management of patients with tetanus-risk wounds is low and decreases with age, becoming minimal in geriatric patients. Elderly and women are less likely to have an effective vaccination status against tetanus.

5.
Nutrition ; 74: 110835, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32280058

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Beginning in December 2019, the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has caused a pneumonia epidemic that began in Wuhan, China, and is rapidly spreading throughout the whole world. Italy is the hardest hit country after China. Considering the deleterious consequences of malnutrition, which certainly can affect patients with COVID-19, the aim of this article is to present a pragmatic protocol for early nutritional supplementation of non-critically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19 disease. It is based on the observation that most patients present at admission with severe inflammation and anorexia leading to a drastic reduction of food intake, and that a substantial percentage develops respiratory failure requiring non-invasive ventilation or even continuous positive airway pressure. METHODS: High-calorie dense diets in a variety of different consistencies with highly digestible foods and snacks are available for all patients. Oral supplementation of whey proteins as well as intravenous infusion of multivitamin, multimineral trace elements solutions are implemented at admission. In the presence of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficit, cholecalciferol is promptly supplied. If nutritional risk is detected, two to three bottles of protein-calorie oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are provided. If <2 bottles/d of ONS are consumed for 2 consecutive days and/or respiratory conditions are worsening, supplemental/total parenteral nutrition is prescribed. CONCLUSION: We are aware that our straight approach may be debatable. However, to cope with the current emergency crisis, its aim is to promptly and pragmatically implement nutritional care in patients with COVID-19, which might be overlooked despite being potentially beneficial to clinical outcomes and effective in preventing the consequences of malnutrition in this patient population.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Suplementos Nutricionais , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Administração Oral , COVID-19 , Protocolos Clínicos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Hospitalização , Humanos , Desnutrição/prevenção & controle , Pandemias , Vitamina D/administração & dosagem , Proteínas do Soro do Leite/administração & dosagem
7.
Nutrition ; 26(5): 575-8, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20036514

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The proper management of nutritional support remains a challenging task in many Western hospitals. This study aimed at reporting a 4-y survey on the centralized management of nutritional support by a malnutrition task force in an Italian research hospital. METHODS: The requests for nutritional supports, the number of patients treated with enteral nutrition in the medical and surgical units, and the number of home artificial nutritional support activated were recorded from 2005 to 2008. RESULTS: The median number of first and follow-up visits per month significantly increased from 16 (25th-75th percentiles 13-26) in 2005 to 74 (25th-75th percentiles 69-82) in 2008 (P < 0.001) and from 56 (25th-75th percentiles 42-82) in 2005 to 101 (25th-75th percentiles 90-120) in 2008 (P = 0.001), respectively. This trend was observed also in the number of patients treated with enteral nutrition (from 95 in 2004 to 190 in 2008) and in those on home artificial nutritional support (from 25 in 2004 to 65 in 2008), whereas the number of parenteral nutrition bags produced remained substantially stable. CONCLUSION: The centralized management of nutritional support is a successful strategy, which provides the appropriate prescription of artificial nutrition during hospitalization and at discharge. Multidisciplinary nutrition support teams or task forces should be created in every hospital.


Assuntos
Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Hospitais , Desnutrição/prevenção & controle , Apoio Nutricional , Nutrição Enteral/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Itália , Apoio Nutricional/estatística & dados numéricos , Nutrição Parenteral/estatística & dados numéricos , Nutrição Parenteral no Domicílio/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA