Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 41(9): 1165-1170, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29894002

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Early failure of Biotronik Linox and Linox Smart leads (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) has been reported in numerous recent publications. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of this lead compared with that of two other contemporary leads. METHODS: We conducted an ambispective study of all consecutive first implantations of defibrillator leads carried out in our center: Endotak (model 148, 158, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) (n = 173), Sprint Quattro (model 6644, 6947, Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) (n = 145), and Linox Smart (Biotronik, model SD 65/16) (n = 120). RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 4.6 ± 2.1 years, failure occurred in nine Linox Smart (7.5%), one Endotak Reliance (0.6%), and no Sprint Quattro leads. The survival probability of the Linox Smart group was significantly lower than that of the Endotak and Sprint Quattro groups measured by the log-rank test (Linox vs Endotak; P < 0.001 and Linox vs Sprint Quattro; P < 0.001). Nonphysiological signals not due to external interference were observed in all Linox Smart leads, with normal parameters and without visible anomalies on chest x-ray. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center experience, the survival rate of Linox Smart leads was 88% at 5 years of follow-up, which was significantly lower than that of the other leads. Comprehensive vigilance of Linox Smart leads, including home monitoring, may be advisable to facilitate early detection of lead failure and avoid inappropriate shocks.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Eletrodos Implantados/efeitos adversos , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 77(3): 243-253, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37516312

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is considered more reliable, efficient, and safer than conventional in-person follow-up. However, the implementation of RM is still suboptimal. This study aimed to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rates of CIED implants and RM activations in Spain. METHODS: The COVID-19 RM Spain Registry was used to analyze the monthly number of all CIED implantations and RM activations from January 2018 to December 2021. A descriptive analysis was performed using aggregated data from the five major CIED manufacturers. RESULTS: A total of 205 345 CIEDs were recorded. The number of implants decreased sharply (48.2%) during the pandemic lockdown (March-June 2020) but gradually increased thereafter, compensating for the previous reduction. However, pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) showed an aggregate loss of 7% and 3%, respectively, from the annual average during 2020-2021. In contrast, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) increased by 17%, and pacemakers (CRT-P) by 4.5% over the 2-year period. The percentage of RM activations increased from 24.5% in 2018 to 49.0% in 2021, with a sharp increase during the lockdown. The RM activation rates consistently increased during the lockdown for all devices: pacemakers (14.4% vs 37.2%; P <.001); ICD (75.6% vs 94.2%; P <.001); CRT-D/CRT-P (68.6-44.2% vs 81.6-61%; P <.001), and implantable loop recorders (50.2% vs 68.7%; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: The significant decline in implants during the lockdown gradually recovered, except for pacemakers and ICD. However, the COVID-19 pandemic boosted RM for all CIEDs in Spain.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Terapia de Ressincronização Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Marca-Passo Artificial , Humanos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis
4.
Eur Cardiol ; 18: e01, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36844932

RESUMO

The European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of sudden cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmias have been updated. Additions and amendments range from clinical management to invasive procedures, and provide new perspectives on integrated management, genetic testing, stratification of risk, arrhythmia ablation and device therapy among others. Significant improvements have been made, which will result in better care for patients and families.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA