Effect of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir on weight-adjusted tacrolimus trough/dose ratios in heart and kidney transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetic implications of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) use on tacrolimus posttransplant are unknown. This study sought to investigate the effects of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P), a CYP3A4 substrate and inhibitor, on weight-adjusted tacrolimus (FK) trough/dose ratio (T/D) following heart or kidney transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremic donors to HCV negative heart or kidney transplant recipients who received 12 weeks of G/P therapy. Weight-adjusted T/D was assessed while patients were at steady-state before, during, and after G/P treatment. Forty-one HCV negative recipients (three heart, 38 kidney) were evaluated. RESULTS: The weight-adjusted T/D significantly increased during G/P treatment (119.31, IQR 88-173.8) compared to before G/P treatment (67.4, IQR 53.4-115.9) (p < 0.01), but decreased after completion of treatment (90.1, IQR 52.9-122.7) (p < 0.01). There was no difference in weight-adjusted T/D before and after G/P treatment (p = 0.42). Four patients experienced acute rejection. CONCLUSION: Initiation of G/P in heart or kidney transplant recipients induces a reversible change in tacrolimus metabolism. A 33%-50% tacrolimus dose reduction may be considered at the time of G/P initiation. Regardless of tacrolimus dose adjustment, tacrolimus trough levels should be monitored 3 days after initiation of G/P. No clear relationship between HCV viremic organ transplantation and rejection risk was found. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Commercial insurance delays direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C kidney transplantation into uninfected recipients.

INTRODUCTION: The advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has created an avenue for transplantation of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected donors into uninfected recipients (D+/R-). The donor transmission of HCV is then countered by DAA administration during the post-operative period. However, initiation of DAA treatment is ultimately dictated by insurance companies. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 52 D+/R- kidney recipients who underwent DAA treatment post-transplant was performed. Patients were grouped according to their prescription coverage plans, managed by either commercial or government pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients had government PBMs and 13 had commercial PBMs. Demographics were similar between the two groups. All patients developed HCV viremia, but cleared the virus after treatment with DAA. Patients with government PBMs were treated earlier compared to those with commercial PBMs (11 days vs 26 days, P = .01). Longer time to DAA initiation resulted in higher peak viral loads (ß = 0.39, R2  = .15, P = .01) and longer time to HCV viral load clearance (ß = 0.41, R2  = .17, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: D+/R- transplantation offers patients an alternative strategy to increase access. However, treatment can be profoundly delayed by a third-party payer authorization process that may be subjecting patients to unnecessary risks and worsened outcomes.

Novel Potassium Binders for Early Postoperative Hyperkalemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the safety/efficacy of novel potassium binders (patiromer, sodium zirconium cyclosilicate [SZ-9]) for early postoperative hyperkalemia following kidney transplantation. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center, cohort study of deceased-donor kidney recipients transplanted between 1/2018 and 12/2020. Potassium-binder use was evaluated from immediately posttransplant until discharge. Potassium binders were administered ≥2 hours before/after medications. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were included, 24 (13%) of whom received potassium binders (16 [67%] patiromer, 7 [29%] SZ-9, 1 [4%] both) for a mean of 2.5 (±3.18) doses. Peak potassium levels were higher in the potassium-binder group (6.05 vs 5.35 mEq/L; P < .001). More patients on potassium binders transitioned to atovaquone than those on no binders (n = 21 [100%] vs n = 112 [75%], respectively; P = .005). Delayed graft function (DGF) was observed in 100 (56%) patients, with a higher proportion receiving potassium binders (18 [75%] vs 82 [53%], respectively; P = .042). There was no difference between groups in number of posttransplant dialysis sessions required in the general study population (P = .2), nor in the DGF group (P = .12). No difference was noted in the incidence of ileus (P = .2), or gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting; P = .6). Of the 24 patients who received inpatient binders, 9 (37.5%) were discharged and remained on them for a mean of 46 (±49) days. CONCLUSION: Patiromer and SZ-9 appear safe in the early posttransplant period, but larger prospective trials are needed. Potassium-binder use does not appear to be associated with fewer dialysis sessions in DGF patients, however, they may be used as additional tools for lowering potassium in these patients.

A Safe Anti-A2 Titer for a Successful A2 Incompatible Kidney Transplantation: A Single-center Experience and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Kidney allocation system allows blood type B candidates accept kidneys from A2/A2B donors. There is no mandate by UNOS on which the anti-A2 level is acceptable. We aimed to investigate the safety of kidney transplant in blood group B patients with anti-A2 titers ≤16. METHODS: We performed 41 A2-incompatible kidney transplants in blood group B recipients between May 2015 and September 2019. Clinical outcomes were compared with a control group of 75 blood group B recipients who received blood group compatible kidney transplantation at the same period. RESULTS: Of the 41 recipients, 85% were male, 48% African American, with a median age of 53 (20-73) y. Thirty-eight (93%) were deceased-donor and 3 (7%) were living-donor kidney transplant recipients. Pretransplant anti-A2 IgG titers were 2 in 16, 4 in 9, 8 in 6, and 16 in 5 and too weak to titer in 5 recipients. Eight patients had pretransplant donor-specific antibodies. During a median follow-up of 32.6 mo (6-57.3) patient and graft survival were 100% and 92% in the A2-incompatible kidney transplant group, and 91% and 92% in the blood group compatible group, respectively. Twelve A2-incompatible recipients underwent a 21 clinically indicated kidney biopsies at a median 28 d (6-390) after transplantation. None of the patients developed acute antibody-mediated rejection and 2 patients (5%) had acute T-cell-mediated rejection. Interestingly, peritubular capillary C4d positivity was seen in 7 biopsies which did not have any findings of acute rejection or microvascular inflammation but not in any of the rejection-free biopsies in the control group. C4d positivity was persistent in 5 of those patients who had follow-up biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: A2-incompatible transplantation is safe in patients with anti-A2 titers ≤16 with excellent short-term kidney allograft outcomes. C4d positivity is frequent in allograft biopsies without acute rejection.

The use of LCP-Tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) in simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Extended release LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) allows once-daily dosing in transplant recipients. The improved bioavailability may be beneficial for simultaneous pancreas-kidney recipients (SPK). METHODS: This is a study of 39 SPK recipients on standard immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-TAC, n = 21) or LCPT (n = 18). Coefficient of variability (CV = 100∗standard deviation/mean) was calculated to assess drug levels. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), tacrolimus and creatinine levels were measured postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no difference in tacrolimus CV in the IR-TAC and LCPT groups at 1 month or 3 months postoperatively; however, a greater difference was observed at 1 year (41.0 vs. 33.1%; p = 0.19). There were six episodes of acute rejection in the IR-TAC group compared to zero episodes in the LCPT group (p = 0.01). HbA1c was significantly higher in the IR-TAC group compared to LCPT at 3 (5.5 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.01), 6 (5.6 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.01) and 12 months (5.8 vs. 5.1%, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly lower rates of rejection were observed in patients receiving LCPT. The once daily dosing may facilitate medication adherence and result in improved long-term outcomes.