Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 89(4): 743-8, 2008 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18374007

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To clarify whether sonography or electrophysiologic testing is a better predictor of symptom severity and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to assess the diagnostic value of sonography in patients with idiopathic CTS. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: University hospital physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four hands with CTS and 38 normative hands were evaluated. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, which comprised symptom severity and functional status scale, was applied to CTS patients. Bilateral upper-extremity nerve conduction studies of median and ulnar nerves and sonographic imaging of the median nerve were performed in all participants. Sonographic evaluation was performed by a physician blinded to the physical and electrophysiologic findings of the subjects. RESULTS: Cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel entrance and proximal carpal tunnel were 12.5+/-2.6 and 10.6+/-2.6 versus 15.6+/-4.2 and 11.5+/-3.2 in CTS patients versus controls, respectively. Increased CSA of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel entrance (P<.002) and at the proximal carpal tunnel (P<.000) were detected in the hands with CTS. Flattening ratios did not differ in a statistically significant manner between the groups (P>.05). The best predictor of symptom severity was median nerve sensory distal latency and that of functional status was median nerve motor distal latency. The optimum cutoff value for median nerve CSA was 11.2mm(2) at the carpal tunnel entrance and 11.9mm(2) at the proximal carpal tunnel. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values at the proximal carpal tunnel (88%, 66%, 71%, 80%, respectively) were higher than those at the carpal tunnel entrance (68%, 62%, 65%, 66%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The best predictors of symptom severity and functional status in idiopathic CTS seem to be the electrophysiologic assessments rather than sonographic measurements. On the other hand, sonography may be helpful in the diagnosis of idiopathic CTS.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/diagnóstico , Eletromiografia/métodos , Ultrassonografia Doppler/métodos , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/reabilitação , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Eletrodiagnóstico/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Probabilidade , Curva ROC , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Valores de Referência , Análise de Regressão , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA