The association between overweight/obesity and double diabetes in adults with type 1 diabetes; a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Double Diabetes (DD), type 1 diabetes (T1DM) + insulin resistance (IR), is associated with increased risk of micro/macro-vascular complications and mortality. Obesity can contribute to the development of DD. This study explored the prevalence of overweight/obesity and their association with DD in adults with T1DM. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of consecutive adults with T1DM attending diabetes clinics in a secondary care hospital (January-November 2019). Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) was used as a marker of IR, and an eGDR < 8 was used to identify individuals with DD. RESULTS: One hundred seven adults with T1DM were included; female/male: 51/56; age [median (inter-quartile range): 30.0 (23-51) years]; BMI 25.4 (22.8-30.0) kg/m2. Overweight/obesity prevalence was 57/107 (53.3 %) [overweight: 30/107 (28 %); obesity: 27/107 (25.2 %)]. Compared to those with normal BMI, individuals with T1DM and overweight/obesity had longer diabetes duration; higher total daily insulin dose; and higher DD prevalence: 48/57 (84.2 %) vs. 14/50 (28 %) (p < 0.01); with similar HbA1c. BMI correlated with total daily insulin dose (rho = 0.55; p < 0.01). Individuals with DD were older, had longer duration of diabetes, higher HbA1c, and more adverse lipid profile and microalbuminuria compared to those without DD. CONCLUSIONS: Overweight/obesity is very common in adults with T1DM, and is associated with double diabetes. BMI is positively associated with total insulin dose. Double diabetes is associated with adverse cardiovascular risk profile and is also common in lean individuals with T1DM. Further research is needed to examine the impact of overweight/obesity in people with T1DM and whether weight loss in this population can improve diabetes-related outcomes.

Cross-sectional audit assessing the quality of dried bloodspot specimens received by UK metabolic biochemistry laboratories for the biochemical monitoring of individuals with Phenylketonuria.

BACKGROUND: Sapropterin has been approved as a treatment option for individuals with Phenylketonuria in the United Kingdom. Individuals are assessed as responsive to Sapropterin by a ≥30% reduction in Phenylalanine (Phe) concentrations using dried blood spot (DBS) specimens. DBS quality is critical for accurate and precise measurement of Phe. Currently, UK national guidelines for DBS specimen acceptance do not exist for patient-collected DBS specimens. We adopted evidence-based guidelines for specimen acceptance criteria and retrospectively assessed the impact of introducing these guidelines on specimen rejection rates. Methods: Laboratories were invited to audit the quality of DBS specimens routinely received for Phe monitoring using: (1) existing acceptance/rejection criteria and (2) proposed national guidelines. RESULTS: Ten laboratories audited 2111 specimens from 1094 individuals. Using existing local guidelines, the median rejection rate was 4.0% (IQR 1.5-7.2%). This increased to 21.9% (IQR 10.0-33.0%) using the proposed guidelines. Where reason(s) for rejection were provided (n = 299); 211/299 (70.6%) of DBS specimens were too small or multi-spotted. 380 individuals had more than one sample evaluated; 231/380 (60.8%) provided specimens of acceptable quality, 37/380 (9.7%) consistently provided poor-quality DBS specimens. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variability in the quality of patient-collected DBS specimens. If unacceptable specimens are not rejected, imprecise/inaccurate results will be used in clinical decision making. Using annual workload data for England, this equates to 12,410 incorrect results. Individuals and parents/carers should receive ongoing training in blood collection technique to ensure use of evidence-based acceptability criteria does not cause undue distress from increased sample rejection rates.