The use of autologous bone for augmentation procedures leads to low prevalence of peri-implantitis-a retrospective study over a 20-year period.

The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of peri-implantitis in implants inserted into pristine bone (control) to implants where autologous bone was used for grafting procedures (study). All patients who underwent implant surgery during a 20 years interval by one maxillofacial implant surgeon and received a prosthodontic rehabilitation afterwards were eligible for inclusion in the study. Periimplant bone resorption and periimplant disease were assessed. Of 421 patients 384 (91.2%) patients responded to a recall after having been treated over a 20-year period by one maxillofacial surgeon and several dentists. A total of 110 patients had 239 implants in pristine bone, and 274 patients had 607 implants placed in combination with autologous bone grafting procedures. Mean time in function was 74 months (range 15-236 months). In all, 342 implants (34.8%) were in function for longer than 7 years. A total of 64 implant sites (7.6%) in 39 patients (10.2%) showed signs of peri-implant mucositis. In addition, 17 implants (2.0%) in 14 patients (3.6%) revealed signs of peri-implantitis, of which five implants were in the control group (2.09%) whereas 12 implants were in the study group (1.98%), with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.8405). More than half of the patients with peri-implantitis had a history of periodontitis. Three implants were lost due to peri-implantitis and four implants failed for other reasons, resulting in an overall success rate of 99.2% in 846 implants. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the study it seems that the use of autologous bone still is a relevant option when performing augmentation procedures because of the low prevalence of peri-implantitis.

Non-syndromic orofacial clefts in Southern Italy: pattern analysis according to gender, history of maternal smoking, folic acid intake and familial diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Genetic studies have demonstrated that non-syndromic clefts of the lip, alveolus and palate have an heterogeneous genetic background, and that environmental factors contribute to the onset of this malformation. Therefore studies on different and homogeneous populations can be useful in detecting potentially related environmental and genetic factors. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether gender, folic acid intake, family history of diabetes and/or smoking during pregnancy were associated with a specific type of cleft in a group of patients affected by non-syndromic clefts, collected from Southern Italy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from one hundred and twenty-six patients were evaluated retrospectively. Each cleft was described as composed by separate antomical entities such as lip, alveolus, primary and secondary palate. None had an isolated alveolar cleft and this was used as internal control. Pattern analysis was used to detect differences in the frequencies of any possible combination of 7 types of clefting stratified according to the studied variables. Data were analysed by comparing observed proportions. RESULTS: Isolated cleft palate as well as right-sided clefts of lip, alveolus and palate were more frequent in females (p = 0.0014 and 0.0281, respectively), while left sided clefts were more frequent in males (p = 0.0359). A lack of consumption of folic acid was associated with an higher incidence of clefts of the left lip (p = 0.018), while familial diabetes was associated more often with isolated cleft palate (p = 0.0014). CONCLUSIONS: Gender-related results were comparable with those found in Northern Italy and other countries. Environmentally related results disclosed specific subclasses of clefting associated with lack of folic acid consumption and familial diabetes.