Effect of Amputation Level on Quality of Life and Subjective Function in Children.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to discern whether children with amputations have differences in subjective function based on amputation level. We hypothesized that children with more proximal amputations would report poorer function and quality of life. METHODS: An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review of patients aged 0 to 21 years old with lower extremity amputations was performed. Demographic information, type of amputation, type of prosthesis, and the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) was collected from parents and children (above 10 y old). Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the level of amputation (ankle; transtibial; knee; transfemoral), and PODCI scores were compared between groups. PODCI subscores were also compared between unilateral versus bilateral amputations, high-demand versus low-demand prostheses, and congenital versus acquired amputations. RESULTS: We identified 96 patients for analysis (39 ankle, 21 transtibial, 27 knee, and 9 transfemoral amputations). The sports/physical functioning subscale of the PODCI showed the only statistically significant difference between amputation level and outcome with ankle-level amputations reporting higher scores than knee-level amputations (parent: 78.3±16.4 vs. 60.0±25.3, P=0.006; child: 87.4±15.3 vs. 65.4±31.5, P=0.03). Although not significantly different from either the ankle, knee, or transfemoral groups, patients with transtibial amputations reported intermediate scores (parent: 68.5±27.5; child: 78.9±25.5). There were no significant differences among amputation level for PODCI transfers, pain/comfort, global function, or happiness subscales. In subgroup analysis, same-level congenital amputees had similar scores to acquired amputees (P>0.05). When compared with unilateral knee amputations patients, patients with bilateral knee amputations had significantly worse transfer (62.4 vs. 88.3; P=0.02), sports/physical functioning (34.2 vs. 66.2; P=0.01), and global domains (58.4 vs. 80.5; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Subjective sports and physical functioning of pediatric amputees were significantly worse after knee amputation when compared with ankle-level amputations. Although not statistically significant at all levels, our data suggest a graded decline in sports/physical functioning with higher level amputations. Amputation level did not affect pain, happiness, or basic mobility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Effectiveness of the Ponseti Method for Treating Clubfoot Associated With Amniotic Band Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Amniotic band syndrome (ABS) is a congenital disorder with an associated incidence of clubfoot deformity in over 50% of patients. Although early reports in the literature demonstrated a poor response to casting treatments, recent application of the Ponseti technique in ABS patients have been more promising. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with clubfoot and a concurrent diagnosis of ABS were reviewed at a single institution. Patients not managed initially with the Ponseti method were excluded. Data collected included patient age at presentation, sex, unilateral or bilateral, amniotic band location and associated findings, and response to treatment-number of casts and requirement of Achilles tenotomy, tibialis anterior tendon transfer, or other surgical procedures. Duration of treatment at latest follow-up visit was noted and outcome was based on clinical foot appearance and plan for any further procedures. RESULTS: Twelve patients (7 female and 5 male) with a total of 21 feet (9 bilateral and 3 unilateral) were identified. The average age at presentation was 3 weeks (range, 1 to 9 wk). The average number of casts was 6 (range, 3 to 11). Seventeen of 21 feet (81.0%) underwent percutaneous Achilles tenotomy. The initial correction rate for all patients with the Ponseti technique was 20/21 feet (95.2%) and recurrence was noted in 7/21 feet (33.3%). One patient underwent primary posteromedial release and 2 patients had associated neurological deficits. The average follow-up was 3.9 years (range, 9 mo to 10 y) and all but one patient had supple, plantigrade feet. CONCLUSION: The Ponseti technique is an effective first-line treatment in patients who have clubfeet associated with ABS, including those with a neurological deficit. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Anatomic Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Anteromedial Portal All-Inside and Outside-In Techniques.

Tunnel malposition is one of the most common technical reasons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. Small changes in tunnel placement can result in significant differences in outcome. More anatomic placement of the tunnels can lead to greater knee stability and a more accurate reproduction of native knee kinematics. This Technical Note describes 2 tibial tunnel-independent methods to obtain anatomic femoral tunnel placement. The all-inside anteromedial portal technique requires only minimal surgical incisions but allows precise femoral tunnel placement. However, hyperflexion of the knee is required, adequate surgical assistance is necessary, and this technique may be susceptible to graft-tunnel mismatch. The outside-in technique may be more beneficial in obese patients, skeletally immature patients, or revision cases. On the downside, it does require an additional 2-cm surgical incision. This article also provides surgical pearls to fine-tune tibial tunnel placement.