Endobronchial valves for patients with heterogeneous emphysema and without interlobar collateral ventilation: open label treatment following the BeLieVeR-HIFi study.

Outcomes in early trials of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves for the treatment of patients with advanced emphysema were inconsistent. However improvements in patient selection with focus on excluding those with interlobar collateral ventilation and homogeneous emphysema resulted in significant benefits in the BeLieVeR-HIFi study compared with sham treated controls. In this manuscript we present data from the control patients in the BeLieVeR-HIFi study who went on to have open label endobronchial valve treatment after completion of the clinical trial (n=12), combined with data from those in the treatment arm who did not have collateral ventilation (n=19). Three months after treatment FEV1 increased by 27.3 (36.4)%, residual volume reduced by 0.49 (0.76) L, the 6 min walk distance increased by 32.6 (68.7) m and the St George Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD score improved by 8.2 (20.2) points. These data extend the evidence for endobronchial valve placement in appropriately selected patients with COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN04761234; Results.

Chest radiography cannot predict diaphragm function.

The finding of hemidiaphragm elevation on a chest radiograph, in absence of an ipsilateral lung disease, is assumed to indicate severe hemidiaphragm dysfunction. To test this hypothesis we retrospectively reviewed chest radiograph findings and corresponding twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure (T(W)P(DI)) results from 42 (17 female, age range 22-79 years) consecutive patients who underwent phrenic nerve stimulation studies. Chest radiographs were independently reviewed in a blind manner by two radiologists. The interobserver agreement was moderate, the kappa value ranging from 0.48 (left hemidiaphragm) to 0.59 (lung parenchyma). Hemidiaphragm dysfunction was diagnosed if T(W)P(DI) of corresponding hemidiaphragm was less than 3.5 cm H2O. The prevalence of patients with an elevated unilateral hemidiaphragm on chest radiograph was 64% and of patients with unilateral paralysis judged by T(W)P(DI) was 24%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for chest radiograph, as a diagnostic test for unilateral diaphragm dysfunction were 0.90, 0.44, 0.33 and 0.93, respectively. We conclude that the isolated elevation of hemidiaphragm on chest radiograph is of little value in the diagnosis of unilateral hemidiaphragm paralysis, though the condition is unlikely if diaphragm elevation is absent.