Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
1.
Clin J Sport Med ; 30(4): 404-411, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29933279

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) poses a threat to athletes' capacity to compete. This review aims to estimate the rate of return to sport after hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAI as well as identify factors that may affect athletes' outcomes. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. METHODS: Four databases (EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane) were searched in July 2015 by 2 reviewers. Studies were required to include athletes who were treated with hip arthroscopy for symptomatic FAI and also report return to sport as an outcome. A validated tool was used for quality assessment and level of agreement between raters was calculated. A meta-analysis for proportions returning to sport was performed on the available data using MedCalc software. Additional outcomes were descriptively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 15 case series involving 823 patients were included in the review, with moderate to high methodological quality. 88.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 83.4%-92.4%] of athletes returned to sport after arthroscopy and 85.3% (95% CI, 77.6%-91.6%) returned to preinjury level. All outcome measures used reported measurable improvements. Complication rates were low. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of athletes return to sport after hip arthroscopy for symptomatic FAI. Severity of intraarticular damage and degree of degenerative changes affect ability to return to sport. Additional validated outcome measures should be used together with return to sport. Future studies should be prospective with longer-term follow-up to provide a higher level of evidence for outcomes.


Assuntos
Artroscopia , Impacto Femoroacetabular/reabilitação , Impacto Femoroacetabular/cirurgia , Artroscopia/efeitos adversos , Impacto Femoroacetabular/patologia , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Volta ao Esporte , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 43(1): 74-78, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27592341

RESUMO

Treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been confined to parenteral agents and oral vitamin K antagonists for decades; however, with the approval of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), clinicians now have more options. This study aims to evaluate the real world prescribing practices of all oral anticoagulants for VTE at a single center. A retrospective cohort analysis of all adult patients diagnosed with acute onset VTE was conducted. Of the 105 patients included in the analysis, 45 (43 %) patients received warfarin and 60 (57 %) patients received a DOAC. Rivaroxaban and apixaban were the most common DOACs initiated. There were significantly more patients in the warfarin group with an eCrCl of <60 ml/min compared to patients who received a DOAC (77.8 % vs. 15 %; P < 0.05). There were significantly less patients in the warfarin group with serum aminotranferase concentrations three times the upper limit of normal compared to those who received a DOAC (15.6 % vs. 55 %; P < 0.05). Patients who received a DOAC had less days on parenteral anticoagulation compared to patients who received warfarin (median 2.5 days [IQR 0-4] vs. 6 days [IQR 5-7], p < 0.05). Patients who received a DOAC had a shorter hospital length of stay compared to patients who received warfarin (median 3 days [IQR 2-4] vs. 8 days [IQR 6-10], p < 0.05). This analysis showed that DOACs are being prescribed more than warfarin for treatment of new onset VTE. Renal and liver function may influence the agent prescribed. Utilization of DOACs may decrease the hospital length of stay.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Transaminases/sangue , Varfarina/uso terapêutico
4.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 17(1): 263, 2017 Aug 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28830383

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is increasingly recognized that disrespect and abuse of women during labor and delivery is a violation of a woman's rights and a deterrent to the use of life-saving, facility-based labor and delivery services. In Ethiopia, rates of skilled birth attendance are still only 28% despite a recent dramatic national scale up in the numbers of trained providers and facilities. Concerns have been raised that womens' perceptions of poor quality of care and fear of mistreatment might contribute to this low utilization. This study examines the experiences of disrespect and abuse in maternal care from the perspectives of both providers and patients. METHODS: We conducted 45 in-depth interviews at four health facilities in Debre Markos, Ethiopia with midwives, midwifery students, and women who had given birth within the past year. Students and providers also took a brief quantitative survey on patients' rights during labor and delivery and responded to clinical scenarios regarding the provision of stigmatized reproductive health services. RESULTS: We find that both health care providers and patients report frequent physical and verbal abuse as well as non-consented care during labor and delivery. Providers report that most abuse is unintended and results from weaknesses in the health system or from medical necessity. We uncovered no evidence of more systematic types of abuse involving detention of patients, bribery, abandonment or ongoing discrimination against particular ethnic groups. Although health care providers showed good basic knowledge of confidentiality, privacy, and consent, training on the principles of responsive and respectful care, and on counseling, is largely absent. Providers indicated that they would welcome related practical instruction. Patient responses suggest that women are aware that their rights are being violated and avoid facilities with reputations for poor care. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that training on respectful care, offered in the professional ethics modules of the national midwifery curriculum, should be strengthened to include greater focus on counseling skills and rapport-building. Our findings also indicate that addressing structural issues around provider workload should complement all interventions to improve midwives' interpersonal interactions with women if Ethiopia is to increase provision of respectful, patient-centered maternity care.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Trabalho de Parto/psicologia , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Abuso Físico/psicologia , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Etiópia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Instalações de Saúde , Humanos , Tocologia , Direitos do Paciente , Assistência Perinatal , Gravidez , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Valor da Vida , Direitos da Mulher
5.
Hosp Pharm ; 51(8): 656-661, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27698506

RESUMO

Background: For patients on continuous IV unfractionated heparin (UFH), failing to achieve a therapeutic aPTT by 24 hours can be associated with increased morbidity. A pharmacy clinical surveillance system (PCSS) subtherapeutic aPTT alert was implemented at our institution to improve achievement of therapeutic aPTT goals by 24 hours. Objective: The primary objective was the time to achieve the minimum goal aPTT before and after the alert implementation. The secondary objectives were to examine the percentage of patients who achieved the minimum goal aPTT by 24 hours and the number of dose changes to achieve the minimum goal aPTT. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted to include all adult inpatients receiving a continuous UFH infusion during a 3-month period prior to the implementation of a subtherapeutic aPTT alert and a 3-month period after implementation. Results: 317 patients were included in the analysis. The average time to achieve the minimum goal aPTT was 21.8 hours prior to alert implementation and 15.4 hours after implementation (p = .002). The percent of patients who achieved the minimum goal aPTT by 24 hours was 65.7% prior to alert implementation and 82.4% after implementation (p = .035). The average number of dose changes necessary to achieve aPTT value to the minimum goal aPTT prior to alert implementation was 1.67 and 1. 98 after implementation (p = .68). Conclusion: This analysis showed that implementation of a PCSS subtherapeutic aPTT alert for patients on continuous UFH infusions may ensure patients reach goal aPTT faster and facilitate a higher percent of patients who achieve the minimum goal aPTT by 24 hours.

6.
J Am Chem Soc ; 136(4): 1296-9, 2014 Jan 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24397446

RESUMO

Creating allotropes and polymorphs of nanoparticles (NPs) has gained tremendous momentum in recent times. Group 14 (C, Si, Ge) has a number of allotropes; some with significant applications. Here we report the synthesis of Si NPs crystallizing in the BC8 structure via a colloidal route for the first time. The BC8 structure is a metastable structure of Si that can be accessed from the ß-Sn form through the release of high pressure. These Si BC8 structured NPs were synthesized via reduction of SiI4 with n-butyllithium, capped with octanol and precipitated from solution. The transmission electron microscopy lattice fringes as well as the selected area electron diffraction pattern of the precipitate are consistent with the BC8 structure. The LeBail whole profile fitting of powder X-ray diffraction data also confirms the structure as the BC8 phase. The Raman spectrum provides further evidence to support the BC8 structure. With proper tuning of the band gap these NPs could be potential candidates for solar cells.

9.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 50(4): 260-268, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38087723

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals were caring for increasing numbers of patients with a novel and highly contagious respiratory illness, forcing adaptations in care delivery. The objective of this study was to understand the impact of these adaptations on patient safety in hospital medicine. METHODS: The authors conducted a nationwide survey to understand patient safety challenges experienced by hospital medicine clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey was distributed to members of the Society of Hospital Medicine via an e-mail listserv. It consisted of closed- and open-ended questions to elicit respondents' experience in five domains: error reporting and communication, staffing, equipment, personal protective equipment (PPE) and isolation practices, and infrastructure. Quantitative questions were reported as counts and percentages; qualitative responses were coded and analyzed for relevant themes. RESULTS: Of 196 total responses, 167 respondents (85.2%) were attending physicians and 85 (43.8%) practiced at teaching hospitals. Safety concerns commonly identified included nursing shortages (71.0%), limiting patient interactions to conserve PPE (61.9%), and feeling that one was practicing in a more hazardous environment (61.4%). In free-text responses, clinicians described poor outcomes and patient decompensation due to provider and equipment shortages, as well as communication lapses and diagnostic errors resulting from decreased patient contact and the need to follow isolation protocols. CONCLUSION: Efforts made to accommodate shortages in staff and equipment, adapt to limited PPE, and enforce isolation policies had unintended consequences that affected patient safety and created a more hazardous environment characterized by less efficient care, respiratory decompensations, diagnostic errors, and poor communication with patients.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Medicina Hospitalar , Humanos , Pandemias , Segurança do Paciente , Equipamento de Proteção Individual
10.
Ann Pharmacother ; 47(11): 1400-5, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24285756

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Brigham and Women's Hospital implemented a dexmedetomidine stewardship program in October 2010 beginning with an institution-specific prescribing guideline. To ensure continued adherence to the prescribing guideline, a pharmacist-driven quality assurance program was implemented in November 2011. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study is to describe the role and impact of a dexmedetomidine stewardship program on dexmedetomidine use at a tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: This is a prospective descriptive analysis of a dexmedetomidine stewardship program. Dexmedetomidine stewardship data were collected prospectively from January 2012 through June 2012, in all intensive care units (ICUs) at a single academic medical center. Adult patients (>18 years old) receiving dexmedetomidine therapy continuously for sedation and in the ICU were included in the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were identified during the study time frame, during which 71 (71.7%) were identified as compliant with the institutional guideline. The total number of patients receiving dexmedetomidine for greater than 24 hours was 13 (13.1%), of whom 10 (76.9%) received targeted interventions; 15 (15.2%) targeted interventions were made on all patients receiving dexmedetomidine during the study time frame. The total use of dexmedetomidine during the study period was 1310 vials, compared with 5404 vials during the equivalent time frame in 2010-a 76% reduction. CONCLUSIONS: A dexmedetomidine stewardship program, including an institution-specific prescribing guideline and a pharmacist-driven quality assurance program may ensure guideline compliance and decreased use of dexmedetomidine at an academic medical center.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapêutico , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/normas , Adulto , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Satisfação do Paciente , Farmacêuticos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/normas , Papel Profissional , Estudos Prospectivos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Centros de Atenção Terciária/normas , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
11.
J Sport Rehabil ; 2013 Oct 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24152802

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hip arthroscopy is a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is being increasingly recognized as a cause of hip pain in athletes and is a growing indication for arthroscopic surgery. Few studies have attempted to address patient views on outcome following arthroscopy and no qualitative studies have been carried out to date. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study are to explore athletes' perceptions of rehabilitation outcome, the rehabilitative process and return to sport and to gain an insight into factors that affected this process. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective qualitative approach was adopted using semi-structured interviews. Eight eligible participants were interviewed. Each had been treated with hip arthroscopy for FAI between September-November 2010. Data were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged. 1. Ability to participate in sport; athletes were relatively satisfied with outcome despite some limitations in sporting ability. 2. Perceptions of hip problems; there was a lack of understanding and an association of hip problems with older people among the general public. 3. Athletes' perception of rehabilitation; athletes were dissatisfied with the rehabilitation and sought greater physiotherapy input. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, athletes were relatively satisfied with their outcome, one year post hip arthroscopy, despite some having to adapt their sporting activities. Key areas that need to be addressed in future research include factors affecting outcomes of hip arthroscopy, longer term outcomes, perception of FAI among the public and health practitioners and the development of standardized evidence-based rehabilitation protocol.

12.
Br Ir Orthopt J ; 19(1): 1-6, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36818462

RESUMO

Aim: To report a case of two siblings who near-simultaneously developed a large angle concomitant esotropia during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to describe their treatment and outcomes. Method: A 5-year-old boy and his 11-year-old sister were presented to the hospital eye service in early 2021, having both developed acute-onset large angle esotropia within three months of each other. Neither had any significant past medical, ophthalmic, or family history. The siblings lived in the same household, and both experienced lifestyle changes as a result of the UK lockdown in response to COVID-19. Results: Each sibling was treated with right medial rectus recession (5.5 mm) and right lateral rectus resection (7 mm), and at a three-month follow-up, both were minimally esophoric with restored binocularity. Conclusion: The unusual and abrupt changes in lifestyle imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic highlight the likelihood of an environmental aetiology for some forms of esotropia and raise the possibility that extended screen time may be a contributory factor.

13.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 30(5): 838-845, 2023 04 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36718575

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies examining the effects of computerized order entry (CPOE) on medication ordering errors demonstrate that CPOE does not consistently prevent these errors as intended. We used the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Network of Patient Safety Databases (NPSD) to investigate the frequency and degree of harm of reported events that occurred at the ordering stage, characterized by error type. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of safety events reported by healthcare systems in participating patient safety organizations from 6/2010 through 12/2020. All medication and other substance ordering errors reported to NPSD via common format v1.2 between 6/2010 through 12/2020 were analyzed. We aggregated and categorized the frequency of reported medication ordering errors by error type, degree of harm, and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 12 830 errors were reported during the study period. Incorrect dose accounted for 3812 errors (29.7%), followed by incorrect medication 2086 (16.3%), and incorrect duration 765 (6.0%). Of 5282 events that reached the patient and had a known level of severity, 12 resulted in death, 4 resulted in severe harm, 45 resulted in moderate harm, 341 resulted in mild harm, and 4880 resulted in no harm. CONCLUSION: Incorrect dose and incorrect drug orders were the most commonly reported and harmful types of medication ordering errors. Future studies should aim to develop and test interventions focused on CPOE to prevent medication ordering errors, prioritizing wrong-dose and wrong-drug errors.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas , Segurança do Paciente , Humanos , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Bases de Dados Factuais , Estudos Retrospectivos
14.
Fed Pract ; 39(4): 176-180, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35756823

RESUMO

Background: The Pain Outcomes Questionnaire-For Veterans (POQ-VA) was developed within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) as a brief but psychometrically sound pain outcomes instrument that assesses key domains. In routine clinical practice, it is valid and reliable for evaluating effectiveness of treatment of chronic noncancer pain in veterans. We hypothesized that POQ-VA scores would improve across multiple domains in the veteran population following injection-based interventional treatment for chronic pain. Methods: We aggregated all available POQ-VA reports from veterans who underwent ≥ 1 interventional pain procedures between April 1, 2009 and April 1, 2019. Patients were included who had pre- and posttreatment POQ-VA results separated by ≤ 6 months (N = 112). A paired-samples t test was used to compare means, standard deviations, and ranges for each POQ-VA domain. Individual question responses were analyzed using a nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Results: All POQ-VA domains showed a statistically significant decrease posttreatment (P ≤ .03). Directionally, the responses to 17 of 20 individual POQ-VA questions reflect a small but statistically significant positive treatment response (P < .04). Conclusions: Most veterans undergoing injection therapy for chronic pain had statistically significant improvements in POQ-VA measures within a 6-month period. To conduct more rigorous, multivariate studies, continued and widespread use of the POQ-VA instrument is warranted.

15.
J Patient Saf ; 18(8): e1219-e1225, 2022 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35948317

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: It is unknown how hospital- and systems-level factors have impacted patient safety in the intensive care unit (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to understand how the pandemic has exacerbated preexisting patient safety issues and created novel patient safety challenges in ICUs in the United States. METHODS: We performed a national, multi-institutional, mixed-methods survey of critical care clinicians to elicit experiences related to patient safety during the pandemic. The survey was disseminated via email through the Society of Critical Care Medicine listserv. Data were reported as valid percentages, compared by COVID caseload and peak of the pandemic; free-text responses were analyzed and coded for themes. RESULTS: We received 335 survey responses. On general patient safety, 61% felt that conditions were more hazardous when compared with the prepandemic period. Those who took care of mostly COVID-19 patients were more likely to perceive that care was more hazardous (odds ratio, 4.89; 95% CI, 2.49-9.59) compared with those who took care of mostly non-COVID-19 or no COVID-19 patients. In free-text responses, providers identified patient safety risks related to pandemic adaptations, such as ventilator-related lung injury, medication and diagnostic errors, oversedation, oxygen device removal, and falls. CONCLUSIONS: Increased COVID-19 case burden was significantly associated with perceptions of a less safe patient care environment by frontline ICU clinicians. Results of the qualitative analysis identified specific patient safety hazards in ICUs across the United States as downstream consequences of hospital and provider strain during periods of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Pandemias , Segurança do Paciente , Cuidados Críticos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
16.
Prog Transplant ; 21(1): 6-13; quiz 14, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21485938

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacology and safety of oral over-the-counter cough suppressants and expectorants and to present recommendations for the use of these agents in solid-organ transplant recipients based on the potential for adverse drug reactions or drug-disease interactions. DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION: Data from journal articles and other sources describing the pharmacology and safety of over-the-counter cough suppressants and expectorants, drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressive agents, and drug-disease state interactions are reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Potential and documented drug-drug interactions between immunosuppressive agents and over-the-counter cough medications guaifenesin, dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, and codeine were evaluated on the basis of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles. Interactions between these cough medications and the physiological changes in the body following transplantation also were examined. CONCLUSION: Diphenhydramine requires additional monitoring when used to treat cough in transplant recipients owing to its anticholinergic properties and the potential for interactions with cyclosporine. Dextromethorphan can be used in most transplant recipients, although greater caution should be exercised if the patient has undergone liver transplant or has liver impairment. Guaifenesin can be used in transplant recipients but should be used with caution in patients receiving kidney or lung transplants and in patients with renal impairment. Codeine combined with guaifenesin is another option for cough and can be used in most transplant patients although those with reduced renal function should be monitored carefully for adverse events.


Assuntos
Antitussígenos/efeitos adversos , Expectorantes/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Órgãos , Antitussígenos/uso terapêutico , Codeína/efeitos adversos , Codeína/uso terapêutico , Contraindicações , Dextrometorfano/efeitos adversos , Dextrometorfano/uso terapêutico , Difenidramina/efeitos adversos , Difenidramina/uso terapêutico , Interações Medicamentosas , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos , Expectorantes/uso terapêutico , Guaifenesina/efeitos adversos , Guaifenesina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Segurança
17.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed ; 208: 106175, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34082373

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), the herniation of the pelvic organs toward the vaginal opening, is a common pelvic floor disorder (PFD) whose etiology is poorly understood. Traditional methods for evaluating POP are often constrained to external vaginal examination, limited to 2D, or have poor reproducibility. We propose a reliable 3D anatomic coordinate system for standardized 3D assessment of pelvic anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: The novel 3D anatomic reference system is based on six bony landmarks of the pelvis manually identified in MRI: the ischial spines and the superior and inferior pubic points of the left and right pubic symphysis. The origin of this system is defined as the midpoint of the ischial spines. The reproducibility and applicability of the pelvic coordinate system were evaluated by (1) implementing it in a new method to quantify vaginal position and axis (angulation) in 3D space from MRI segmentations of the vagina and (2) computing the intraclass correlation (ICC) on coordinate system and vaginal measures. The MRI analysis was performed by four non-medically trained observers on five pelvic MRI datasets on approximately five separate occasions. RESULTS: Overall, all bony landmarks had excellent intra-observer reliability and inter-observer reliability (ICC>0.90); intra-observer reliability was moderate-to-good among the vaginal position parameters (0.5

Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Pelve , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Vagina/diagnóstico por imagem
18.
Perioper Med (Lond) ; 10(1): 11, 2021 Apr 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33845914

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory surgical procedures continue to grow in relevance to perioperative medicine. Clinical studies have examined the use of systemic lidocaine as a component of multimodal analgesia in various surgeries with mixed results. A quantitative review of the opioid-sparing effects of systemic lidocaine in ambulatory surgery has not been investigated. The primary objective of this study was to systematically review the effectiveness of systemic lidocaine on postoperative analgesic outcomes in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. METHODS: We performed a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials in electronic databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar) from their inception through February 2019. Included trials investigated the effects of intraoperative systemic lidocaine on postoperative analgesic outcomes, time to hospital discharge, and adverse events. Methodological quality was evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the level of evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. Data was combined in a meta-analysis using random-effects models. RESULTS: Five trials evaluating 297 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled effect of systemic lidocaine on postoperative opioid consumption at post-anesthesia care unit revealed a significant effect, weighted mean difference (95% CI) of - 4.23 (- 7.3 to 1.2, P = 0.007), and, at 24 h, weighted mean difference (95% CI) of - 1.91 (- 3.80 to - 0.03, P = 0.04) mg intravenous morphine equivalents. Postoperative pain control during both time intervals, postoperative nausea and vomiting reported at post anesthesia care unit, and time to hospital discharge were not different between groups. The incidence rate of self-limiting adverse events of the included studies is 0.007 (2/297). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that intraoperative systemic lidocaine as treatment for postoperative pain has a moderate opioid-sparing effect in post anesthesia care unit with limited effect at 24 h after ambulatory surgery. Moreover, the opioid-sparing effect did not impact the analgesia or the presence of nausea and vomiting immediately or 24 h after surgery. Clinical trials with larger sample sizes are necessary to further confirm the short-term analgesic benefit of systemic lidocaine following ambulatory surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ( CRD42019142229 ).

19.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 2019 Aug 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31401620

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Several studies have evaluated the effect of pectoral nerve blocks to improve postoperative analgesia following breast cancer surgery resulting in contradictory findings. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of Pecs blocks on postoperative analgesia in women following mastectomies. METHODS: We performed a quantitative systematic review in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Articles of randomized controlled trials that compared Pecs block (types I and II) to a control group in patients undergoing mastectomy were included. The primary outcome was total opioid consumption 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and side effects. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effect model. RESULTS: 7 randomized controlled trials with 458 patients were included in the analysis. The effect of pectoral nerve blocks on postoperative opioid consumption compared with control revealed a significant effect, weighted mean difference (WMD) (95% CI) of --4.99 (-7.90 to -2.08) mg intravenous morphine equivalents (p=0.001). In addition, postoperative pain compared with control was reduced at 6 hours after surgery: WMD (95% CI) of -0.72 (-1.37 to -0.07), p=0.03, and at 24 hours after surgery: WMD (95% CI) of -0.91 (-1.81 to -0.02), p=0.04. DISCUSSION: This quantitative analysis of randomized controlled trials demonstrates that the Pecs block is effective for reducing postoperative opioid consumption and pain in patients undergoing mastectomy. The Pecs block should be considered as an effective strategy to improve analgesic outcomes in patients undergoing mastectomies for breast cancer treatment.

20.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 76(3): 153-165, 2019 Jan 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30689746

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The Delphi method was used to develop best practice recommendations (BPR) for safe use of pulmonary hypertension (PH) pharmacotherapies and to describe the pharmacist's role in provision of care. METHODS: A core group reviewed PH medication-safety literature and developed initial BPR. Pharmacists practicing at PH-accredited Centers of Comprehensive Care who met defined PH expert criteria were invited to participate on an expert panel. In round 1 of a 4-round Delphi process, expert input was provided on the BPR. Feedback was incorporated into BPR for the next round. Round 2 proceeded in identical fashion to round 1. In round 3, BPR were deliberated in a teleconference and underwent voting at the cessation of the round using a 5-point Likert scale. Median scores of < 2.5, 2.5-3.75, and > 3.75 resulted in a best practice statement being rejected, reviewed in round 4, or accepted in the final BPR, respectively. In round 4, the remaining BPR were discussed and underwent voting. BPR were assigned a level of evidence and strength of recommendation based on voting results. RESULTS: Eleven PH experts agreed to participate and met expert inclusion criteria, along with 2 pharmacists from the core group, bringing the total number of expert panel members to 13. To guide safe use of PH pharmacotherapies, 26 BPR were developed, categorized into 5 practice domains, comprising the PH Care Center accreditation process, inpatient practice, formulary management, diagnostics, and ambulatory care. BPR included provisions for safe use of parenteral prostacyclin agents and healthcare practitioner education. CONCLUSION: The Delphi method was used to develop BPR to guide safe use of PH pharmacotherapies.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Técnica Delphi , Hipertensão Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacêuticos/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Anti-Hipertensivos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA