Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Health Expect ; 19(2): 437-47, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25912002

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: An investigation of the domains Italian patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) named as constituting their quality of life over time. DESIGN: We assessed, in 68 patients, QoL domains using the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual QoL: (a) before MS diagnosis disclosure, (b) thirty days after disclosure, and (c) after one and (d) four years' follow-up. RESULTS: The life domains most frequently named by patients were as follows: Family, Work and Finance, Hobbies, Health, Relationship with Friends and Job Effectiveness. Only Health and Job Effectiveness domains varied with time. The Health domain became a critical dimension when MS diagnosis was revealed. In addition, patients tended to be more satisfied with their health after disclosure compared to pre-diagnosis. Job Effectiveness seemed to be an important aspect until 1 year after diagnosis disclosure, but it tended to become less crucial over time. Family seems to be the most important domain over time, and psychological adaptation to MS seems to be characterized by a reconceptualization of aspects that revolve around oneself, such as professional success, rather than relational or affective factors. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating the most relevant life domains for patients and their alteration over time may provide practitioners with an important tool in making health-related decisions, thus improving health outcomes and QoL.


Assuntos
Revelação , Esclerose Múltipla/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Emprego , Família/psicologia , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico
2.
BMC Fam Pract ; 14: 75, 2013 Jun 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23758941

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Evidences from literature suggest that Primary Care Physicians' (PCPs) knowledge and attitude about psychological and pharmacological treatments of anxiety and depressive disorders could influence their clinical practice. The aim of the study is double: 1) to assess PCPs' opinions about antidepressants (ADs) and psychotherapy for the management of anxiety and depressive disorders; 2) to evaluate the influence of PCPs' gender, age, duration of clinical practice, and office location on their opinions and attitudes. METHODS: This cross-sectional multicentre survey involved 816 PCPs working in four Local Health Units of the Emilia Romagna Region. Participating PCPs were asked to complete a questionnaire during educational meetings between October 2006 and December 2008. RESULTS: The response rate was 65.1%. Eighty-five percent of PCPs agreed on the effectiveness of ADs for depressive disorder whereas lower agreement emerged for anxiety disorder and on psychotherapy for both anxiety and depression. Forty percent of PCPs reported to feel "very/extremely confident" in recognizing depression and 20.0% felt equally confident in treating it with pharmacotherapy. Considering anxiety disorder, these proportions increased. Female PCPs and those located in the rural/mountain areas reported to adopt more psycho-educational support compared to male and suburban colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that an effort should be made to better disseminate recent evidences about the management of anxiety and depressive disorders in Primary Care. In particular, the importance of psychological interventions and the role of drugs for anxiety disorder should be addressed.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Médicos de Família/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Competência Clínica , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos de Família/educação , Psicoterapia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
J Neurol Sci ; 275(1-2): 86-91, 2008 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18786682

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient involvement in decisions regarding their care has been advocated, but preferences have not been adequately canvassed, particularly in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVES: To cross-culturally adapt and validate the Italian version of the Control Preference Scale (CPS) subsequently used to assess preferences of people with MS. METHODS: Translation-adaptation into Italian of CPS from the original Canadian English followed by administration in 140 people with MS from five Italian centers (with re-administration in 35) and semi-structured interview. RESULTS: Cross-cultural adaptation of CPS was successful. The 140 people with MS, who varied in clinical and general characteristics, considered the CPS clear and acceptable. Test-retest reliability was moderate (weighted Kappa 0.65; p<0.001). A collaborative role was preferred (61%), followed by passive (33%) and active (6%) roles. Education (odds ratio [OR] 2.43, 95% confidence limits [CI] 1.05-5.66) and length of follow-up at referral center (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.92) were associated with choice of an active/collaborative role in the logistic model. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian CPS was well accepted by our MS population. Our data indicate that a high proportion of Italians with MS prefer a more passive role and this should be considered during the clinical encounter.


Assuntos
Atitude , Tomada de Decisões , Esclerose Múltipla/psicologia , Participação do Paciente/psicologia , Psicometria/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Comparação Transcultural , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tradução , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA