RESUMO
In recent years, researchers and practitioners have begun to modify existing cognitive assessment instruments and develop new tools in order to increase the accuracy of mental capacity evaluations among seniors in cross-cultural settings. Based on a review of the literature and consultations with members of the Aboriginal capacity assessment committee at the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Edmonton, Canada, during the summer of 1998, the authors argue that both the process by which capacity assessments are conducted and the content of the assessment instruments are problematic. The article summarizes the difficulties that differing degrees of acculturation within and between Aboriginal groups create for cognitive evaluations. It recommends steps that mental health professionals can follow to develop meaningful assessment strategies for Aboriginal seniors that reflect both the content and the interactional processes that characterize their traditional cultural orientations.