Comparison of lacosamide concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in patients with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to estimate the exposure of the central nervous system (CNS) to the antiepileptic drug (AED) lacosamide, under steady state conditions, in patients with epilepsy who take oral lacosamide alongside up to three other AEDs. METHODS: Twenty-seven serum and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected from 21 patients receiving lacosamide for the treatment of epilepsy (50-600 mg/day over two or three doses). This included 23 time-matched pairs of serum and CSF samples from 19 patients. The concentration of lacosamide in each sample was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Linear regression was used to characterize the relationship between the CSF-to-serum ratio of lacosamide concentration and the time since dosing, the daily lacosamide dose, or the daily dose normalized by volume of distribution (Vd , approximated to total body water), and between the drug concentrations in each compartment (CSF vs. serum). RESULTS: Concentrations of lacosamide in CSF (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 7.37 ± 3.73 µg/ml, range 1.24-14.95, n = 27) and serum (mean ± SD 8.16 ± 3.82 µg/ml, range 2.29-15.45, n = 27) samples showed a good correlation over the dose range investigated. The mean CSF-to-serum ratio of lacosamide concentrations was 0.897 ± 0.193 (range 0.492-1.254, n = 23 time-matched pairs) and was independent of lacosamide dose. SIGNIFICANCE: Drug concentrations in the CSF are often used to indicate those in the brain interstitial fluid. In patients with epilepsy who follow a stable oral AED dosing regimen, lacosamide concentration in CSF is approximately 85% of that found in serum, suggesting that serum may be a valuable indicator of lacosamide concentration in the CNS.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation of coadministration of lacosamide and an oral contraceptive (levonorgestrel plus ethinylestradiol) in healthy female volunteers.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the antiepileptic drug lacosamide affects the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of a combined oral contraceptive (OC; ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg plus levonorgestrel 0.15 mg). METHODS: This was an open-label trial in healthy female volunteers. Eligible women entered cycle 1 of the trial on the first day of menstruation. Cycle 1 was a medication-free, run-in phase of approximately 28 days to confirm that normal ovulation occurred. Volunteers with confirmed ovulation entered the subsequent cycle and started taking OCs. After establishing ovulation suppression (defined as progesterone serum concentration <5.1 nm on day 21 of the menstrual cycle) in volunteers taking the OCs in cycle 2, lacosamide 400 mg/day was administered concomitantly in the subsequent cycle (cycle 3). The pharmacokinetic parameters of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum steady-state plasma drug concentration (Cmax ), and time to maximum concentration (tmax ) were measured for the OC components and lacosamide. KEY FINDINGS: A total of 37 volunteers completed cycle 1, and 32 completed cycle 2. In each of the 31 volunteers who completed the trial (through cycle 3), pharmacodynamic assessment showed progesterone serum concentration was <5.1 nm on day 21 of cycle 2, when the OC was administered alone, and on day 21 of cycle 3, when lacosamide was administered concomitantly. The AUC of ethinylestradiol alone versus together with lacosamide was 1,067 ± 404 versus 1,173 ± 330 pg h/ml. Corresponding values of Cmax were 116.9 ± 48.8 versus 135.7 ± 28.6 pg/ml. For levonorgestrel, the AUC alone was 74.2 ± 21.4 versus 80.9 ± 18.5 ng h/ml with lacosamide. Corresponding values of Cmax were 6.7 ± 1.9 versus 7.4 ± 1.5 ng/ml. The AUC and Cmax point estimates and almost all 90% confidence intervals (except for Cmax of ethinylestradiol) for ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel (with and without lacosamide) were within the conventional bioequivalence range, and no relevant changes in tmax were observed for ethinylestradiol (1.5 ± 0.6 h alone vs. 1.4 ± 0.7 h with lacosamide) or for levonorgestrel (1.5 ± 1.0 h alone vs. 1.1 ± 0.6 h with lacosamide). Lacosamide pharmacokinetics were consistent with those observed in previous studies of lacosamide alone, with values for AUC of 113.5 ± 20.7 µg h/ml, Cmax of 13.8 ± 2.2 µg/ml, and tmax of 1.1 ± 0.4 h. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide and an OC containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel have low potential for drug-drug interaction; therefore, coadministration of the two drugs is unlikely to result in contraceptive failure or loss of seizure control.

Lack of effect of lacosamide on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of warfarin.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the antiepileptic drug lacosamide on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the anticoagulant warfarin. METHODS: In this open-label, two-treatment crossover study, 16 healthy adult male volunteers were randomized to receive a single 25-mg dose of warfarin alone in one period and lacosamide 200 mg twice daily on days 1-9 with a single 25 mg dose of warfarin coadministered on day 3 in the other period. There was a 2-week washout between treatments. Pharmacokinetic end points were area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0,last) and AUC(0,∞) ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) for S- and R-warfarin. Pharmacodynamic end points were area under the international normalized ratio (INR)-time curve (AUCINR ), maximum INR (INRmax ), maximum prothrombin time (PTmax ) and area under the PT-time curve (AUCPT ). KEY FINDINGS: Following warfarin and lacosamide coadministration, Cmax and AUC of S- and R-warfarin, as well as peak value and AUC of PT and INR, were equivalent to those after warfarin alone. In particular, the AUC(0,∞) ratio (90% confidence interval) for coadministration of warfarin and lacosamide versus warfarin alone was 0.97 (0.94-1.00) for S-warfarin and 1.05 (1.02-1.09) for R-warfarin, and the AUCINR ratio was 1.04 (1.01-1.06). All participants completed the study. SIGNIFICANCE: Coadministration of lacosamide 400 mg/day did not alter the pharmacokinetics of warfarin 25 mg or the anticoagulation level. These results suggest that there is no need for dose adjustment of warfarin when coadministered with lacosamide.

Tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and bioequivalence of the tablet and syrup formulations of lacosamide in plasma, saliva, and urine: saliva as a surrogate of pharmacokinetics in the central compartment.

PURPOSE: To test for bioequivalence of 200 mg lacosamide oral tablet and syrup formulations. Additional objectives were to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of lacosamide in saliva and plasma, and to evaluate its tolerability. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, two-way crossover trial was conducted in 16 healthy Caucasian male participants in Germany. The bioequivalence of 200 mg lacosamide tablet and syrup was evaluated using plasma to determine maximum measured concentration (C(max)) and area under the curve from zero to the last time point (AUC)(0-tz). Plasma and saliva samples for evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters of lacosamide and the major metabolite O-desmethyl lacosamide (SPM 12809) were taken over 15 time points (0.5-72 h) and used to statistically compare bioavailability of the two. Urine samples were collected predose and over five time points (0-48 h) to evaluate the cumulative amount of unchanged drug and metabolite. KEY FINDINGS: Lacosamide median time to reach C(max) (t(max)) was 1 h for tablet and 0.5 h for syrup in plasma and saliva. Mean terminal half life (t(½)) for tablet and syrup was 12.5 and 12.4 h in plasma, and 13.1 and 13.3 h in saliva, respectively. Tablet and syrup mean plasma AUC(0-tz) was 84.5 and 83.3 µg/mL*h, respectively. Mean AUC(0-tz) in saliva was 93.2 µg/mL*h for tablet and syrup. Mean C(max) for tablet was 5.26 µg/mL in plasma and 5.63 µg/mL in saliva. Syrup mean C(max) was 5.14 and 8.32 µg/mL in plasma and saliva, respectively. Within 2 h of syrup administration, elevated lacosamide concentration in saliva compared to plasma was observed. The ratio of lacosamide syrup to tablet was 0.98 for C(max) and 0.99 for AUC(0-tz) in plasma, and 1.00 for AUC((0-tz)) in saliva; the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for these parameters were within the range of 0.80-1.25, which meets accepted bioequivalence criteria. The syrup-to-tablet ratio for C(max) in saliva was 1.48, and the 90% CIs exceeded the accepted upper boundary for bioequivalence (1.32-1.66). Both formulations were well tolerated. Metabolite concentration versus time profiles for saliva were similar to plasma following tablet and syrup administration. SIGNIFICANCE: The tablet and syrup formulations of lacosamide 200 mg were bioequivalent and well tolerated. Saliva samples were demonstrated to be a suitable surrogate to evaluate lacosamide tablet pharmacokinetics in the central compartment. Due to residual syrup in the buccal cavity, limitations exist when using saliva to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of lacosamide syrup <2 h after administration.

Influence of Age, Heart Failure and ACE Inhibitor Treatment on Plasma Renin Activity in Children: Insights from a Systematic Review and the European LENA Project.

BACKGROUND: Plasma renin activity (PRA) has gained relevance as prognostic marker in adults with heart failure. The use of PRA as a clinically meaningful parameter in children and children with heart failure requires a thorough knowledge of the factors that influence PRA to correctly assess PRA levels. We aim to evaluate the influence of age, heart failure and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) on PRA levels in children. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search to identify studies on PRA levels in healthy children and in children with heart failure. In addition, we analysed PRA data measured before (n = 35, aged 25 days-2.1 years), 4 hours after (n = 34) and within the first 8 days of enalapril treatment (n = 29) in children with heart failure from the European project Labeling of Enalapril from Neonates up to Adolescents (LENA). RESULTS: Age has a profound effect on PRA levels in healthy children, as PRA levels in the literature are up to about 7 times higher in neonates than in older children. Children with heart failure younger than 6 months showed 3-4 times higher PRA levels than healthy peers in both the literature and the LENA studies. In the LENA studies, the ACEi enalapril significantly increased median predose PRA by a factor of 4.5 in children with heart failure after 4.7 ± 1.6 days of treatment (n = 29, p < 0.01). Prior to treatment with enalapril, LENA subjects with symptomatic heart failure (Ross score ≥3) had a significantly higher PRA than LENA subjects with asymptomatic heart failure of comparable age (Ross score ≤2, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Age, heart failure and ACEi treatment have a notable influence on PRA and must be considered when assessing PRA as a clinically meaningful parameter. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trials are registered on the EU Clinical Trials Register (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT 2015-002335-17, EudraCT 2015-002396-18.

Single dose pharmacokinetics of the transdermal rotigotine patch in patients with impaired renal function.

AIM: To evaluate the influence of different stages of chronic renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability of the transdermally applied dopamine agonist rotigotine in an open label group comparison including 32 subjects (healthy, mild, moderate or severe impairment of renal function and patients with end-stage renal insufficiency requiring haemodialysis). METHODS All subjects received a single transdermal 10 cm² patch (24 h patch-on period) containing 4.5 mg rotigotine (nominal drug release 2 mg 24 h⁻¹). Main evaluations included relative bioavailability and renal elimination of rotigotine and its metabolites. RESULTS: Point estimates for the ratios between the groups with moderate to severe renal impairment and healthy subjects for the pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0,t(last) ) and C(max) for the active substance unconjugated rotigotine were near 1:0.88 for AUC and 0.93 for C(max) for moderate renal impairment, 1.14 and 1.18 for severe renal impairment and 1.05 and 1.25 for end-stage renal insufficiency requiring haemodialysis. There was no correlation of these parameters with creatinine clearance. The amount of unconjugated rotigotine excreted into urine and renal clearance decreased with increasing severity of renal insufficiency but had no observable effect on total clearance as the amounts excreted were below 1% of the administered dose. Occurrence of adverse events did not increase with the degree of renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic profiles of unconjugated rotigotine were similar in healthy subjects and subjects with impaired renal function indicating that no dose adjustments are required for transdermal rotigotine in patients with different stages of chronic renal insufficiency including patients on haemodialysis.

Bioequivalence of intravenous and oral formulations of the antiepileptic drug lacosamide.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the bioequivalence of intravenous and oral lacosamide (tablet), an antiepileptic drug. METHODS: Two randomized, single-dose (200 mg) trials were conducted: a 2-way trial (study A, 15-min infusion, oral tablet) and a 3-way crossover trial (study B, 30- and 60-min infusions, oral tablet). Twenty four healthy men participated in study A and 27 in study B. Eighteen blood samples were taken before to 72 h after lacosamide administration during each treatment period, followed by a 1-week washout. Safety and the ratio of intravenous/oral lacosamide for AUC(0-tz) (area under the concentration-time curve from zero up to the last measurable plasma concentration) and C(max) (maximum plasma concentration) were evaluated. RESULTS: For AUC(0-tz) and C(max), 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of intravenous/oral lacosamide fell within the predetermined bioequivalence range (80-125%) for 30- and 60-min infusions. In study A, all adverse events (AEs) were mild, with no discontinuations. In study B, 3 volunteers discontinued due to AEs; one serious AE (epiglottitis) was reported. No clinically relevant effects on vital signs, electrocardiograms or laboratory parameters and no AEs relating to infusion site were reported. CONCLUSION: Intravenous infusions (15, 30 and 60 min) of 200 mg lacosamide are as well tolerated as the oral tablet. Bioequivalence was demonstrated for 30- and 60-min infusions; therefore, direct conversion from oral to intravenous lacosamide, or vice versa, is possible.

Pharmacokinetics of lacosamide in healthy korean male volunteers.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of single and repeated doses of lacosamide in healthy male Korean volunteers and to compare the PK profile of lacosamide in Korean and Caucasian populations. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-escalation trial, 16 volunteers received a single dose (50 mg) of lacosamide or placebo, and 32 volunteers were administered single/repeated twice-daily doses (100 or 200 mg) of lacosamide or placebo. RESULTS: For multiple doses of 100 and 200 mg twice daily, the geometric means C(max,ss) were 6.23 (15.0) and 13.13 (8.9) µg/ml respectively, and AUC(τ)(,s)(s) values were 52.10 (17.0) and 112.35 (13.0) µg·h/ml, respectively. Values for both parameters were relatively higher than those seen in Caucasians. To further describe ethnic differences, population PK analysis was assessed. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination was selected and effects of CL(creatinine) on CL/F and body surface area on V/F were included in the final model. CONCLUSION: There were no other ethnic differences in the PK profile of lacosamide between Koreans and Caucasians based on the population PK analysis, except for the demographic differences.

Absorption, disposition, metabolic fate and elimination of the anti-epileptic drug lacosamide in humans: mass balance following intravenous and oral administration.

The absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of the anti-epileptic drug lacosamide were determined in 10 healthy male volunteers following intravenous or oral administration in a single-center, open-label, single-dose trial. Volunteers were randomized to receive either a continuous intravenous infusion of 100 mg (40 µCi) [¹4C]-lacosamide administered over 60 min, or a 100 mg (40 µCi) [¹4C]-lacosamide dose given as an oral solution. During the infusion, total radioactivity concentrations reached peak levels at 1 h post dose followed by a decline of 71 % within 24 h. More than 97 % of radioactivity was excreted within 168 h; 96.8 % in urine and 0.3 % in feces. Following oral administration, total radioactivity concentrations increased to peak levels within 0.5 h followed by a decline of 65 % within 24 h. Approximately 94.6 % of radioactivity was excreted within 168 h after oral administration, 94.2 % by the kidneys and 0.4% in feces. A comparison of AUC values (po/iv) of unchanged lacosamide indicates a high absolute bioavailability. The metabolic profile was analyzed using pooled urine samples, and following intravenous and oral administration, respectively, a total of 38 and 34 % unchanged lacosamide, 28 and 28 % of the desmethyl metabolite and 19 and 17 % of a polar fraction were measured. Additional metabolites were identified only in small amounts (<3 %). In plasma at maximum concentration, most of the total radioactivity was found as unchanged drug after intravenous and oral dose. The plasma concentration curves of total radioactivity following intravenous and oral administration were similar.

Enalapril and Enalaprilat Pharmacokinetics in Children with Heart Failure Due to Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Congestive Heart Failure after Administration of an Orodispersible Enalapril Minitablet (LENA-Studies).

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), such as enalapril, are a cornerstone of treatment for pediatric heart failure which is still used off-label. Using a novel age-appropriate formulation of enalapril orodispersible minitablets (ODMTs), phase II/III open-label, multicenter pharmacokinetic (PK) bridging studies were performed in pediatric patients with heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and congenital heart disease (CHD) in five participating European countries. Children were treated for 8 weeks with ODMTs according to an age-appropriate dosing schedule. The primary objective was to describe PK parameters (area under the curve (AUC), maximal concentration (Cmax), time to reach maximal concentration (t-max)) of enalapril and its active metabolite enalaprilat. Of 102 patients, 89 patients (n = 26, DCM; n = 63 CHD) were included in the primary PK endpoint analysis. Rate and extent of enalapril and its active metabolite enalaprilat were described and etiology and age could be identified as potential PK modifying factors. The dosing schedule appeared to be tolerated well and did not result in any significant drug-related serious adverse events. The PK analysis and the lack of severe safety events supports the applied age-appropriate dosing schedule for the enalapril ODMTs.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Enalapril and Enalaprilat in Pediatric Patients-A Systematic Review.

Purpose: Enalapril has an established safety and efficacy in adults and is used in hypertension, heart failure, and renal failure. In pediatric patients, enalapril is labeled for children with hypertension and used off label in children with heart failure. The systematic literature search aims to assess the current knowledge about enalapril and its active metabolite enalaprilat pharmacokinetics in children as a basis for dose delineation for pediatric patients with heart failure. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed in the PubMed database using relevant keywords. Dose normalization of relevant pharmacokinetic parameters of the identified studies was done for comparison between different diseases and pediatric age groups. Results: The literature search has resulted in three pediatric pharmacokinetic studies of enalapril out of which Wells et al. reported about children with hypertension and Nakamura et al., and Llyod et al. presented data for pediatric heart failure patients. The area under the curve values of enalaprilat in hypertensive pediatric patients increased with respect to the age groups and showed maturation of body functions with increasing age. Dose normalized comparison with the heart failure studies revealed that although the pediatric heart failure patients of > 20 days of age showed the area under the curve a similar to that of hypertensive patients, two pediatric patients of very early age (<20 days) were presented with 5-6-fold higher area under the curve values. Conclusion: Data related to the pharmacokinetics of enalapril and enalaprilat in hypertensive patients and few data for young heart failure children are available. Comparison of dose normalized exposition of the active metabolite enalaprilat indicated similarities between heart failure and hypertensive patients and a potentially high exposition of premature patients but substantially more pharmacokinetic studies are required to have reliable and robust enalapril as well as enalaprilat exposures especially in pediatric patients with heart failure as a basis for any dose delineation.

Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics.

In this article, aspects of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion have been described bearing in mind the pathogenesis of allergic diseases and their possible therapeutic opportunities. The importance of the routes of administration of the different therapeutic groups has been emphasized. The classical aspects of drug metabolism and disposition related to oral administration have been reviewed, but special emphasis has been given to intranasal, cutaneous, transdermal, and ocular administration as well as to the absorption and the subsequent bioavailability of drugs. Drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters present in extrahepatic tissues, such as nasal mucosa and the respiratory tract, have been particularly discussed. As marketed antiallergic drugs include both racemates and enantiomers, aspects of stereoselective absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion have been discussed. Finally, a new and promising methodology, microdosing, has been presented, although it has not yet been applied to drugs used in the treatment of allergic diseases.

Absorption, disposition, metabolic fate, and elimination of the dopamine agonist rotigotine in man: administration by intravenous infusion or transdermal delivery.

The dopamine agonist rotigotine was developed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome. Disposition, metabolism, elimination, and absolute bioavailability of rotigotine were determined in six healthy male subjects by using two different forms of administration in a randomized sequence with a crossover design. Treatment A (continuous infusion) consisted of a single radiolabeled 12-h intravenous infusion of 1.2 mg of rotigotine (0.6 mg of [(14)C] and 0.6 mg of unlabeled rotigotine, 3.7 MBq) solution. Treatment B (transdermal application) consisted of a single 10-cm(2) patch containing 4.5 mg of unlabeled rotigotine with a patch-on period of 24 h. During the 12 h-infusion, total radioactivity concentration rapidly increased within 2 h; there was a slight additional increase toward the end of infusion. Plasma concentrations of total radioactivity declined by 75% within 12 h after completion of infusion. More than 94% of the radioactivity was excreted 216 h after the start of infusion, 71% by the kidneys and 23% by feces. Renal elimination of the parent compound was <1%. Systemically absorbed rotigotine was rapidly metabolized. The major rotigotine biotransformation pathway was conjugation of the parent compound, mainly by sulfation; a second pathway was the formation of phase 1 metabolites (N-desalkylation) with subsequent conjugation. Plasma concentration-time profiles of unchanged rotigotine during and after infusion and during and after patch administration were comparable. Absolute bioavailability of transdermally applied rotigotine was 37%.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interactions between transdermal rotigotine and oral levodopa/carbidopa.

This open-label phase I trial assessed potential pharmacokinetic interactions between oral levodopa/carbidopa and transdermal rotigotine treatment at steady state. Twenty-four participants with idiopathic restless legs syndrome (12 per group) received levodopa/carbidopa (100 mg/25 mg bid) and rotigotine (initial dose 2 mg/24 h for 3 days, followed by 4 mg/24 h) in a randomized sequence as monotherapy and in combination during hospitalization for 13 days. Primary pharmacokinetic parameters were AUC(ss) and C(max,ss) of levodopa, carbidopa, and rotigotine at steady state. Mean concentration-time profiles of the 3 agents were similar during monotherapy and combination treatment. The point estimate for the ratio of geometric means (combined vs monotherapy) for AUC(ss) and C(max,ss) for levodopa (0.98 and 1.04), carbidopa (1.03 and 1.06), and unconjugated rotigotine (1.02 and 0.98) was near unity. All 90% confidence intervals were within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (0.8, 1.25). The most frequently documented adverse events were application site reactions (itching and reddening at application site) and headache. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, but 2 were of severe intensity (headache and extrasystoles); no serious adverse events occurred. The data presented indicate that rotigotine and levodopa/carbidopa can be coadministered without pharmacokinetic interactions between the compounds.

Influence of domperidone on pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of the dopamine agonist rotigotine.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Rotigotine transdermal patch is a new non-ergolinic dopamine agonist developed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome. Peripheral dopaminergic side-effects of dopamine agonists such as nausea and vomiting can be prevented by the antiemetic agent domperidone. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: The study results show no evidence for an interaction of domperidone on bioavailability and steady-state pharmacokinetics of transdermal rotigotine. Co-administration of domperidone and rotigotine does not require dose adjustments for rotigotine transdermal patch. AIMS: To evaluate the influence of the antiemetic agent domperidone on steady-state pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of multiple-dose treatment of the transdermally applied non-ergolinic dopamine agonist rotigotine. METHODS: Sixteen healthy male subjects (mean age 30.3 years) participated in a randomized, two-way crossover clinical trial. Treatment A consisted of transdermal rotigotine patch (2 mg (24 h)(-1), 10 cm(2), total drug content 4.5 mg) applied daily for 4 days, and concomitant oral domperidone (10 mg t.i.d.) for 5 days. For treatment B, subjects received only transdermal rotigotine treatment (daily for 4 days). Pharmacokinetic variables describing systemic exposure and renal elimination of rotigotine and metabolites, and safety and tolerability of the treatment were assessed. RESULTS: The primary steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters (C(max,ss) and AUC((0-24),ss)) were similar with or without co-administration of domperidone. Geometric mean ratios were close to 1 and respective 90% confidence intervals were within the acceptance range of bioequivalence (0.8, 1.25): C(max,ss) 0.96 (0.86, 1.08) and AUC((0-24),ss) 0.97 (0.87, 1.08). t(max,ss), t(1/2), secondary parameters calculated on days 4/5 after repeated patch application (C(min,ss), C(ave,ss), AUC((0-tz))) and renal elimination for unconjugated rotigotine and its metabolites were also similar with and without comedication of domperidone. A reduction in the dopaminergic side-effect nausea was seen with domperidone comedication. CONCLUSIONS: No changes of pharmacokinetic parameters describing systemic exposure and renal elimination of rotigotine were observed when domperidone was administered concomitantly with rotigotine. The lack of pharmacokinetic interactions indicates that a dose adjustment of rotigotine transdermal patch is not necessary with concomitant use of domperidone.

Model-dependent pharmacokinetic analysis of enalapril administered to healthy adult volunteers using orodispersible minitablets for use in pediatrics.

INTRODUCTION: Comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) data analysis of drugs administered using developed child-appropriate and market authorized dosage formulation is sparse and is important in pediatric drug development. OBJECTIVES: To compare and evaluate any differences in PK of enalapril administered using two treatments of child-appropriate orodispersible minitablets (ODMTs) and market authorized reference tablet formulation (Renitec®) using PK compartment model and validated least square minimization method (LSMM) of parameter estimation. METHODS: Full profile data sets were obtained from a phase I clinical trial, whereby three treatments of enalapril, ie, reference tablets with 240 mL water (treatment A), child-appropriate ODMTs with 240 mL (treatment B), and ODMTs dispersed in the mouth with 20 mL water (treatment C), were administered to 24 healthy adult volunteers. Virtual validation analysis was conducted using R program to select accurate and precise LSMM of parameter estimation. For the selection of PK model and estimation of parameters, enalapril data were fitted with one-and two-compartment models with first order of absorption and elimination, with and without incorporated lag time parameter (tlag). The log-transformed PK parameters were statistically compared by the two-sided paired t-test with the level of significance of P<0.05. RESULTS: One-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination and incorporated lag time adequately predicted concentrations of enalapril. Reciprocal of predicted concentration using iteratively reweighted LSMM was selected as the most appropriate method of parameter estimation. Comparison of PK parameters including rate constant of absorption and elimination, volume of distribution, and tlag between the three treatments showed significant difference (P=0.018) in tlag between treatments B and A only. CONCLUSION: Compared with reference formulation, enalapril administered from child-appropriate ODMTs administered with 240 mL water appeared 4 minutes earlier in serum. No other differences were observed in absorption, elimination, and relative bioavailability of drug between the three treatment arms.

Simultaneous Semi-Mechanistic Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling Analysis of Enalapril and Enalaprilat Serum and Urine Concentrations From Child Appropriate Orodispersible Minitablets.

Enalapril is recommended as the first line of therapy and is proven to improve survival rates for treatment of Pediatric Heart Failure; however, an approved drug and child appropriate dosage formulation is still absent. The present analysis was conducted to perform a detailed model informed population pharmacokinetic analysis of prodrug enalapril and its active metabolite enalaprilat in serum and urine. Further, a model informed dosage form population-pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted to evaluate differences in pharmacokinetics of enalapril and its active metabolite enalaprilat when prodrug was administered to 24 healthy adults in a crossover, two periods, two treatments, phase I clinical trial using child-appropriate orodispersible mini-tablets (ODMT) and reference (Renitec®) dosage formulation. A simultaneous semi-mechanistic population-pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM software, which predicted full profile serum and urine concentrations of enalapril and enalaprilat. First-order conditional estimation with interaction was used for parameter estimation. Transit compartments added using Erlang distribution method to predicted enalapril absorption and enalaprilat formation phases. Normalized body weight was identified as covariate related to enalapril volume of distribution. Visual predictive check (VPC) plots and conducted bootstrap analysis validated the model. The data from the two formulations were pooled for population-pharmacokinetic analysis and covariate effect of the formulation was found on mean transit time (MTT1) of enalapril absorption. In addition, data of each formulation were modeled separately and the estimated parameters of each individual administered both formulations were correlated using paired samples Wilcoxon rank test (p < 0.05 = significant) which also showed only a significant difference (p = 0.03) in MTT1 i.e., 5 min early appearance of enalapril from ODMT compared to reference tablets. No difference in the pharmacokinetics of active enalaprilat was found from the ODMT compared to the reference formulation. The population pharmacokinetic analysis provided detailed information about the pharmacokinetics of enalapril and enalaprilat, which showed that the ODMT formulation might have similar pharmacodynamic response compared to the reference formulation.

Orodispersible minitablets of enalapril for use in children with heart failure (LENA): Rationale and protocol for a multicentre pharmacokinetic bridging study and follow-up safety study.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of paediatric heart failure is based on paradigms extensively tested in the adult population assuming similar underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) like enalapril are one of the cornerstones of treatment and commonly used off-label in children. Dose recommendations have been extrapolated from adult experience, but the relationship between dose and pharmacokinetics (PK) in (young) children is insufficiently studied. Furthermore, appropriate paediatric formulations are lacking. Within the European collaborative project LENA, a novel formulation of enalapril orodispersible minitablets (ODMT), suitable for paediatric administration, will be tested in (young) children with heart failure due to either dilated cardiomyopathy or congenital heart disease in two pharmacokinetic bridging studies. Paediatric PK data of enalapril and its active metabolite enalaprilat will be obtained. In a follow-up study, the safety of enalapril ODMTs will be demonstrated in patients on long-term treatment of up to 10 months. Furthermore, additional information about pharmacodynamics (PD) and ODMT acceptability will be collected in all three studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Phase II/III, open-label, multicentre study. Children with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (n = 25; 1 month to less than 12 years) or congenital heart disease (CHD) (n = 60; 0 to less than 6 years) requiring or already on ACEI will be included. Exclusion criteria include severe heart failure precluding ACEI use, hypotension, renal impairment, hypersensitivity to ACEI. For those naïve to ACEI up-titration to an optimal dose will be performed, those already on ACEI will be switched to an expected equivalent dose of enalapril ODMT and optimised. In the first 8 weeks of treatment, a PK profile will be obtained at the first dose (ACEI naïve patients) or when an optimal dose is reached. Furthermore, population PK will be done with concentrations detected over the whole treatment period. PD and safety data will be obtained at least at 2-weeks intervals. Subsequently, an intended number of 85 patients will be followed-up up to 10 months to demonstrate long-term safety, based on the occurrence of (severe) adverse events and monitoring of vital signs and renal function. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Clinical Trial Authorisation and a favourable ethics committee opinion were obtained in all five participating countries. Results of the studies will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT 2015-002335-17, EudraCT 2015-002396-18, EudraCT 2015-002397-21.

Drug Delivery and Transport into the Central Circulation: An Example of Zero-Order In vivo Absorption of Rotigotine from a Transdermal Patch Formulation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pharmacokinetic studies using deconvolution methods and non-compartmental analysis to model clinical absorption of drugs are not well represented in the literature. The purpose of this research was (1) to define the system of equations for description of rotigotine (a dopamine receptor agonist delivered via a transdermal patch) absorption based on a pharmacokinetic model and (2) to describe the kinetics of rotigotine disposition after single and multiple dosing. METHODS: The kinetics of drug disposition was evaluated based on rotigotine plasma concentration data from three phase 1 trials. In two trials, rotigotine was administered via a single patch over 24 h in healthy subjects. In a third trial, rotigotine was administered once daily over 1 month in subjects with early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD). A pharmacokinetic model utilizing deconvolution methods was developed to describe the relationship between drug release from the patch and plasma concentrations. Plasma-concentration over time profiles were modeled based on a one-compartment model with a time lag, a zero-order input (describing a constant absorption via skin into central circulation) and first-order elimination. Corresponding mathematical models for single- and multiple-dose administration were developed. RESULTS: After single-dose administration of rotigotine patches (using 2, 4 or 8 mg/day) in healthy subjects, a constant in vivo absorption was present after a minor time lag (2-3 h). On days 27 and 30 of the multiple-dose study in patients with PD, absorption was constant during patch-on periods and resembled zero-order kinetics. CONCLUSION: Deconvolution based on rotigotine pharmacokinetic profiles after single- or multiple-dose administration of the once-daily patch demonstrated that in vivo absorption of rotigotine showed constant input through the skin into the central circulation (resembling zero-order kinetics). Continuous absorption through the skin is a basis for stable drug exposure.

Transdermal administration of radiolabelled [14C]rotigotine by a patch formulation: a mass balance trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The dopamine agonist rotigotine has been formulated in a silicone-based transdermal system for once-daily administration. The objective of the present study was to characterise the mass balance of rotigotine in humans after administration of a single transdermal patch containing radiolabelled [(14)C]rotigotine and to quantify the pharmacokinetic profiles of total radioactivity and the corresponding rotigotine plasma concentrations. METHODS: In a phase I trial, six healthy male Caucasian subjects were administered a single 10 cm(2) patch containing 4.485mg of unlabelled and 0.015mg of [(14)C]-labelled rotigotine (total radioactivity 0.09 MBq per patch) with a patch-on period of 24 hours. Radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting in unused patches, used patches, skin wash samples after 24 hours, plasma, urine and faeces samples up to 96 hours and skin stripping samples at 96 hours post-application. Unconjugated rotigotine in plasma samples was determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma samples were taken predose and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after patch application. RESULTS: The rotigotine transdermal patch was well tolerated, and all subjects completed the trial. A total of 94.6% of the administered dose was recovered within 96 hours after patch application inclusive of the residual amounts in the patch. Within 24 hours, 51% of the total radioactivity was delivered to the human body system and 46.1% was systemically absorbed. Total radioactivity recovered in urine and faeces was 30.4% and 10.2%, respectively, of the radioactivity applied (corresponding to 65.8% and 21.8% of the dose absorbed, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The mass balance of rotigotine within 96 hours after transdermal delivery of rotigotine via a 10 cm(2) [(14)C]rotigotine patch with a total drug content of 4.5mg (corresponding to the nominal dose of 2mg/24 hours for the marketed rotigotine transdermal system) has been 95% explained. The systemic absorption was 46.1% of the administered dose, the majority of which was cleared from the body via urine and faeces within 96 hours after patch application.