The Impact of Telehealth on Obstetrical Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: Nationwide, obstetric clinics modified prenatal care to include telehealth visits in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, enabling the opportunity to investigate its impact on patient outcomes. We hypothesized that use of prenatal telehealth visits would increase the number of prenatal visits, decrease the frequency of urgent triage/emergency department (ED) visits, and improve perinatal outcomes. This study aimed to determine the impact of telehealth on number of obstetric prenatal visits and urgent triage/ED visits amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort of patients from a federally qualified health center in central Texas. Patients with a singleton gestation who delivered after 32 weeks were included. Comparison groups were made between those patients who delivered between May 2020 and December 2020 (presumed modified prenatal visit schedule with in-person and telehealth) and those patients delivering between June 2019 and February 2020 (the traditional care model with in-person visits only). Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to estimate differences in the number of prenatal visits and unscheduled triage/ED visits. RESULTS: A total of 1,654 patients were identified with 801 (48.4%) patients undergoing modified prenatal care and 853 (51.6%) patients receiving traditional care during the study period. No significant differences were seen in overall prenatal attendance or triage/ED presentations. However, when stratified by parity, multiparous patients undergoing modified prenatal care were less likely to experience an urgent triage/ED presentation (8.7 vs. 12.7%; odds ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.61). CONCLUSION: When compared with a traditional prenatal visitation cohort prepandemic, patients who received modified telehealth prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic had similar prenatal attendance and unscheduled emergency presentations. However, multiparous patients experienced a decreased rate of unscheduled emergency presentations. Supplementing prenatal care with telehealth may provide overall comparable prenatal care delivery. KEY POINTS: · Use of telehealth has the potential to improve prenatal care.. · The COVID-19 pandemic allowed for comparison to traditional prenatal care.. · Multiparous patients had a decreased frequency of ED visits.. · Similar prenatal attendance was seen between both prenatal models..

Dyspareunia is associated with chronic pain in premenopausal women with sickle cell disease.

OBJECTIVES: Pain is common in women with sickle cell disease (SCD), but the prevalence of dyspareunia in this unique patient population is unknown. In this study, we sought to determine whether chronic pain is associated with an increased prevalence of dyspareunia in premenopausal women with SCD. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of premenopausal women with SCD was systematically assessed for symptoms of dyspareunia and chronic pain using a standard questionnaire. These results were correlated with each subject's clinical pain phenotype determined by a review of the patient's electronic medical record. RESULTS: Ninety-one premenopausal women with SCD were examined. Thirty-two percent of the women reported dyspareunia. Women with dyspareunia were more likely to have a history of chronic pain (90% versus 61%, p = .006), report more pain days per week (median (interquartile range): 6 (4-7) vs. 3 (0-7), p = .005)), and had a higher oral morphine equivalent dose (145 (45-226) mg vs. 60 (9-160) mg, p = .030). Using a multivariable classification tree analysis, number of days of pain experienced per week was an important predictor of dyspareunia (p = .001). CONCLUSION: Dyspareunia is common in women with SCD, and more common in women with SCD and chronic pain. Providers should assess women with SCD for dyspareunia, especially those with a chronic pain syndrome.