RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The ideal technique for lymph node staging for patients with pathologically confirmed node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of wire/clip localization and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for the axillary staging of these patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in which lymph node staging was performed using wire localization of positive lymph nodes and an SLNB with dual tracer. All patients who presented no metastatic involvement of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) or clip/wire-marked lymph node were spared an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The multidisciplinary committee agreed on axillary treatment for patients with lymph node involvement. RESULTS: Forty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. We identified and extirpated the clip/wire-marked node in all patients (100%), with SLNB performed successfully in 95.3% of patients. The SLN and wire-marked node matched in 80% of patients; 73.8% of patients did not undergo ALND. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Several studies have evaluated the efficacy of various procedures for lymph node marking for women with prechemotherapy lymph node involvement. Most of the studies reported high identification rates (> 94.8%), with false negative rates of < 7%. Similarly, our study allows us to conclude that combined axillary marking (clip and SLNB) in patients with metastatic lymph node at diagnosis and NAC offers a high identification rate (100%) and a high correlation between the wire-marked lymph node and the SLN (80%). This procedure has enabled the suppression of ALND for a significant number of patients (73%).
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Axila/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos , Instrumentos CirúrgicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To analyze risk factors for the cosmetic sequelae of patients treated with oncoplastic procedures and their impact on patient-reported satisfaction. METHODS: Prospective nonrandomized study between 2003 and 2020. Complications and cosmetic sequelae were reported by the surgeon. We employed the Clough classification for oncoplastic procedures (Level 1 and Level 2) and to define the cosmetic sequelae (Type I, Type II and Type III). The assessment of satisfaction and quality of life was performed with the BreastQ™ questionnaire. RESULTS: 429 level 1 and 326 level 2 oncoplastic operations were included. We recorded 89 cosmetic sequelae: 55 deformities (type II), 29 asymmetries (type I), and 5 type III defects. The incidence of cosmetic sequelae at 10 years for levels 1 and 2 oncoplastic procedures was 11.5% and 20.0%, respectively. The level 2 techniques and the postoperative complications increased the risk of cosmetic sequelae. Patients with cosmetic sequelae did not achieve significant improvements in breast satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Cosmetic sequelae affect up to 17% of oncoplastic procedures. Most of them appear during the first 5 years. Cosmetic sequelae and their predisposing factors should be part of the shared decision-making process with patients, as well as part of the training programs for breast surgeons.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mamoplastia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Mastectomia Segmentar , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the success of tumor resection and its postoperative complications, satisfaction, and quality of life using a single-incision approach for breast-conserving surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an observational, prospective study conducted between 2015 and 2018. The study group consisted of patients in whom tumor extirpation and lymph node (LN) staging was performed using a single incision, while the control group consisted of patients who underwent a breast-conserving procedure with independent incisions. All patients were given the preoperative and postoperative module of the Breast-Q™ questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 226 patients met the study's inclusion criteria, 152 of whom successfully underwent breast and LN removal using a single-incision approach (98.7% overall success). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, although there was a greater tendency towards breast seroma in the study group and axillary neuralgia in the control group. Both groups presented a similar rate of breast and axillary salvage surgery. The postoperative Breast-Q™ questionnaire showed that the study group had greater satisfaction with both the breast and the information provided by the surgeon. CONCLUSION: The single-incision approach is as effective as standard surgery, with custom incisions in terms of breast resection, LN staging, and complications. There was greater satisfaction with both the breast and the information provided.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mastectomia Segmentar/métodos , Mastectomia/métodos , Satisfação do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To analyse quality of life and satisfaction after immediate breast reconstruction due to cancer and its determining factors. BACKGROUND: Studying breast reconstruction is important because of its frequency and variability. In addition to the surgical results, it is necessary to analyse the quality of life and patient satisfaction using a specific tool. DESIGN METHODS: An ambispective design was used (n = 101; α = 0.05; precision = 10%), studying anthropometric, sociocultural data, Fagerström test and the BREAST-Q© questionnaire. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with quality of life and satisfaction. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients on diagnosis was 44.87 ± 8.5 years. Forty-one of the patients were carried out a skin-sparing mastectomy (42.7%). Immediate reconstruction was performed with implant in 73 (74.5%). The domains on the BREAST-Q© for quality of life with the lowest scores were physical well-being chest (74) and sexual well-being (61.5). The satisfaction domain with the lowest score was with the breast (59). The variables associated with the worst quality of life in the physical well-being chest domain were the skin-sparing mastectomy (OR, 4.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-14.1) and lymphedema (OR, 12.9; 95% CI, 1.0-159.9). Antibody treatment was associated with a worse score on the psychosocial well-being domain (OR, 4.25; 95% CI, 1.0-18.0) and sexual well-being domain (OR, 7.34; 95% CI, 0.9-54.6). Satisfaction was associated with nicotine dependence on the breast and outcome scale. The higher the dependence on nicotine, the greater the dissatisfaction with the breasts (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.1-5.3) and with the result (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.0-5.9). CONCLUSIONS: The type of treatment and lymphedema modify the patients' quality of life. Nicotine dependence is associated with lower satisfaction with the breast and with the outcome. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study suggests the need for multidisciplinary attention during the first year of adjuvant treatment despite the benefits of immediate reconstruction. It shows the need for preoperative assessment of the level of nicotine dependence, anxiety and depression of smoking patients before preoperative counselling.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Mamoplastia/psicologia , Mastectomia/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação Pessoal , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espanha , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Reduction Mammaplasty (RM) in breast cancer allows mammary remodeling after wide excisions. We aimed to analyze the complications, survival, and quality of life after RM. METHODS: Retrospective study of women who underwent a surgical intervention for breast cancer between 2000 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups: RM and tumorectomy. Postoperative complications, survival and quality of life were assessed using the Breast-Q questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 801 patients were evaluated, with a mean follow up of 84 months. RM patients experienced a longer operating time and hospital stay, and a higher proportion of tissue necrosis compared to tumorectomy patients (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed regarding rate of re-excision or rate of mastectomy, but the recurrence rate at 10 years was higher for RM patients (P < 0.03). Patients who underwent RM reported optimal satisfaction with the breast and a good quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: RM is a useful approach in breast cancer surgery, with a low rate of re-excision and mastectomy. Overall survival at 10 years is similar to that associated with tumorectomy, though with a higher rate of local recurrence. Patient satisfaction and quality of life appears to be good one year after radiotherapy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mastectomia Segmentar/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Oncoplastic surgery is an essential tool in the surgical approach to women with breast cancer. These techniques are not absolute guarantee for a good cosmetic result and therefore some patients will have cosmetic sequelae secondary to poor surgical planning, the effects of adjuvant treatments or the need for resection greater than originally planned. The high frequency of these cosmetic sequelae in oncology practice makes it necessary to classify them for optimal surgical planning. The aim of this paper is to present a classification of cosmetic sequelae after oncoplastic procedures to identify those factors that are crucial to its prevention. This classification contains 4 groups: breast contour deformities, asymmetries, alterations in nipple-aréola complex (NAC) and defects in the three dimensional structure of the breast. A significant group of these sequelae (asymmetries and deformities) are associated with breast irradiation and need an accurate information process with patients to set realistic expectations about cosmetic results. Finally, there is another group of sequelae (NAC disorders and three-dimensional structure) that are related to poor planning and deficiencies in surgical approach, therfore specific training is essential for learning these surgical techniques.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mama/anormalidades , Mama/patologia , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/classificação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controleAssuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia Segmentar/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Margens de Excisão , Mastectomia Segmentar/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
Background: In recent years, mastectomy has increasingly been indicated for women at high risk and those with breast cancer. Prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane implant is an option for these patients. Nevertheless, this procedure can become complicated with exposure of the implant. The aim of this article is to describe the feasibility of local flaps to treat skin necrosis and dehiscence after prepectoral reconstruction and its impact on implant loss. Methods: This study includes the women who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the PreQ-20 protocol (12), which assessed patients with exposed implant who required a local flap for its coverage. Three types of flaps were used: thoracoepigastric, lateral thoracic, and batwing. Results: The study included 226 skin-sparing mastectomies and immediate reconstruction using prepectoral implants (52.7% bilateral mastectomies). Some 20.9% of the patients showed complications, with wound dehiscence the most frequent. Thirteen local flaps to cover the implant were performed. All flaps presented appropriate perfusion; however, the implant cover failed in six patients (46.2%). Conclusions: The use of local flaps can be a low-morbidity option for preventing implant loss when skin dehiscence or necrosis occurs and delays in oncology treatments.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Various studies have evaluated the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on the complications of breast cancer surgery, most of which were retrospective and did not assess the variables related to postoperative risk factors. The aim of this study is to analyse the safety and satisfaction of women included in the PreQ-20 trial who underwent NAC and who underwent mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with prepectoral polyurethane implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patients included in the study belong to the prospective study PreQ-20. The study group consisted of patients who underwent immediate reconstruction after primary systemic therapy. The control groups consisted of patients with immediate reconstruction and adjuvant chemotherapy (control group 1) and patients with an infiltrating carcinoma or in situ ductal carcinoma who did not require chemotherapy (control group 2). RESULTS: The study included 157 women, 58 (36.9%) of whom underwent primary systemic therapy. The indication for genetic study was significantly greater for the study group (87.9%) than for control groups 1 (49.1%) or 2 (30.4%). Seventy-two (45.9%) of the patients underwent bilateral mastectomy (BM), a procedure that was performed significantly more frequently in the study group (69%) than in control groups 1 (30.2%) or 2 (34.8%). The incidence rate for BM after complete pathologic response was 78%. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of complications between the groups. Implant loss was significantly more frequent in control group 1 (13.2%) than in the study group (3.4%) and control group 2 (2.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Mastectomy with prepectoral polyurethane implant reconstruction in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy presented a similar incidence of complications compared with patients who underwent primary surgery. There is a high rate of BM in women with NAC.
RESUMO
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the standard of practice for assessing axillary spread in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. On the other hand, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the ideal procedure for patients with SLN metastasis. Different studies over the last few years have suggested that some patients with positive SLN can be treated without ALND. This article presents a literature review carried out by our multidisciplinary group and its strategy for avoiding routine ALND in women with SLN metastases. In this new strategy ALND should not be performed on women with T1 tumours, with 1-2 positive SLN and undergoing breast conservative surgery. On the other hand, ALND would be indicated in those patients with three or more positive SLN, presence of extracapsular invasion, mastectomised women and triple negative subtype or HER2+ tumours that have not received biological treatment with antibodies.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Biópsia de Linfonodo SentinelaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In last 20 years, lymph node staging procedures in breast cancer have been modified. The objective of this study is to describe the evolution of these procedures at our hospital. METHODS: A prospective observational study that included women with breast cancer who were treated surgically between 2001 and 2017. Four groups were identified according to the therapeutic regimen and 3 study periods defined by the lymph node dissection. RESULTS: 1319 patients met the inclusion criteria. Primary conservative surgery was the most frequent therapy (54.13%), and 615 (46.62%) axillary lymph node dissections (ALND) were performed in the 20-year study period. The percentage of ALND decreased progressively over time, going from 91% in the first period to 34% in the last period. The futile ALND fell to 6.6% in the last year. In the primary conservative surgery, no futile ALND was performed in the last two years. CONCLUSION: The introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy and the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria have modified the indication for ALND. Thus, ALND without involvement have been reduced, thereby avoiding the associated morbidity. The study demonstrates the progressive decrease in the indication of lymphadenectomy in the different study groups, similar to reports by other authors. Several clinical trials have described that these changes have not negatively impacted survival.