Prostatic stents: a narrative review of current evidence.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common chronic urologic condition affecting approximately 50% of men above the age of 60. As per European Association of Urology Guidelines, BPH can be treated according to a stepwise approach starting from a conservative management, a pharmacologic approach, and finally surgery. Both medical and surgical therapies have side effects, impacting on ejaculation and sexual function and patients with multiple comorbidities might not be considered surgically suitable candidates. Prostatic stents offer a minimally invasive procedures in an out-patient setting, possibly under local anaesthesia. Utilized since the 1980s, the past stents encompassed permanent (epithelializing) or temporary (non-epithelializing) devices, like the Uro-Lume (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA) and the Memokath, or Memotherm (Engineers & Doctors A/S, Denmark), and the biodegradable stents made of self-reinforced poly-L-lactide or braided poly lactic-co-glycolic acid. Previous stents however showed a quite high rate of complications among which pain, incontinence, infections, stent migration or blockage, and incomplete degradation that might lead to premature removal of stent. The stents currently available on the market instead are the temporary device Allium Triangular Prostatic Urethral Stent (Allium Urological Solutions, Caesarea, Israel) and the temporary stent SPANNER (AbbeyMoor Medical, Inc., Parkers Prairie, MN, USA), which might be used in case of bladder outflow obstruction, post-operatively, or for acute urinary retention. Studies showed encouraging results, in terms of effectiveness and safety improving patients' quality of life and International Prostate Symptom Score, but longer-term studies are needed to identify the most suitable patients who might benefit from their use. Newer stents and nitinol devices are currently investigated, and we are waiting for the results of the ongoing clinical trials.

Comparison of ureteoroscopy and laser stone fragmentation between Holmium: YAG laser with MOSES versus non-MOSES technology: a prospective single-center propensity score-matched analysis using similar laser settings.

Background: In vitro studies have shown that the holmium Modulated Optics Enhancement Systems (MOSES) technology can lead to an increase in the efficacy of lithotripsy and a reduction of retropulsion, but clinical evidence comparing it to non-MOSES technology is still scarce. We did a comparison of ureteoroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) between Holmium:YAG laser with MOSES versus non-MOSES technologies. Methods: Patient data and outcomes were prospectively collected and analyzed regarding patient demographics, stone parameters, and clinical outcomes. Patients undergoing URSL with standard holmium laser without MOSES technology (Group 1) were compared to holmium laser with MOSES (Group 2) using the same clinical laser settings (0.4-1 J, 20-40 Hz) with dusting and pop-dusting technique. The independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-squared test were used, with a p-value of < 0.05 as significant. Given the different sizes of the cohorts, we performed a propensity score 1:1 matched analysis. Results: A total of 206 patients (1:1 matched) with a male:female ratio of 94:112 and a median age of 56 (range: 39-68) years were analyzed. Groups 1 and 2 were matched for ureteric stones (27.7% and 22.3%, p = 0.42), pre-stenting (37% and 35%, p = 0.66), the mean number of stones (1.76 ± 1.3) and (1.82 ± 1.4, p = 0.73), and ureteral access sheath use (37% and 35%, p = 0.77) respectively.While there was no significant statistical difference in clinical outcomes, the stone size was slightly larger in Group 2, 14.8 ± 10.8 mm vs 11.7 ± 8.0 mm, for a lower operative time 42.7 ± 30.6 min versus 48.5 ± 25 min, lower perioperative complication rates 3.9% versus 4.9% and a higher stone-free rate 90.3% versus 87.4%. Conclusion: While the use of MOSES technology was slightly beneficial for the treatment of stones in terms of clinical outcomes, this was not statistically significant. As this debate continues, there is a need for high-quality randomized studies to show if there is a true difference in these outcomes.

We compare the outcomes of ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL), using Holmium:YAG laser with MOSES vs Non-MOSES technology: It is a prospective single-centre propensity score-matched analysis using similar laser settings It is a single-centre propensity score-matched analysis using similar laser settings. While the use of MOSES technology was slightly beneficial for treatment of stones in terms of clinical outcomes, this was not statistically significant. As this debate continues, there is a need for high quality randomized studies to show if there is a true difference in these outcomes.

Retreatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms After Water Vapor Thermal Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of retreatment for symptomatic recurrence among men who undergo water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT; Rezum, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA), a minimally invasive surgical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with WVTT at a single institution from August 2017 to February 2022. Patients who underwent a second benign prostatic hyperplasia procedure for persistent or recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms within 2years of original treatment were compared to the remaining cohort who did not undergo retreatment. Multivariate analysis was used to assess for predictors of retreatment. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 192 patients. 10 (5%) patients were retreated. The retreatment cohort had smaller prostate volumes (50.4±18.2 cc vs 48.5±35.7 cc; P = .003) and received a greater number of water vapor injections (4.4±1.8 vs 5.2±3.9; P < .001). At 6month follow-up, total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS; 10.13 ± 7.40 vs 18.5 ± 11.55, P = .044) and voiding subscores (4.59 ± 4.39 vs 9.5 ± 7.84, P = .006) were significantly worse in the retreatment group. On multivariate analysis, >1 treatment per lobe was independently associated with increased risk of retreatment (hazard ratio 8.509, 95% CI [1.109-65.293]; P = .039). CONCLUSION: WVTT has a low retreatment rate. Men who required retreatment received more injections and showed worsened voiding symptom scores 6months postoperatively. Decreasing the number of injections may help reduce treatment failure rates.

URS for de-novo urolithiasis after kidney transplantation: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: There is a gap in the available literature and guidelines concerning the optimal approach for treating allograft stones, which currently include external shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of URS as a treatment option for patients in this scenario. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted until August 2023. Only original articles written in English were considered for inclusion. This review has been registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023451154). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eleven articles were included (122 patients). The mean age was 46.9±9.5 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 62:49. The preferred ureteral reimplantation technique was the Lich-Gregoire. The mean onset time was 48.24 months. Acute kidney injury, urinary tract infections and fever were the most frequent clinical presentations (18.3% each), followed by hematuria (10%). The mean stone size measured 9.84 mm (±2.42 mm). Flexible URS was preferred over semirigid URS. The stone-free rate stood at 83.35%, while the overall complication rate was 13.93%, with six (4.9%) major complications reported. Stones were mainly composed of calcium oxalate (42.6%) or uric acid (14.8%). Over an average follow-up period of 30.2 months, the recurrence rate was 2.46%. No significant changes in renal function or allograft loss were reported. CONCLUSIONS: URS remains an efficient choice for addressing de-novo allograft urolithiasis, offering the advantage of treating urinary stones with a good SFR and a low incidence of complications. Procedures should be performed in an Endourology referral center.

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for De Novo Urolithiasis After Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Introduction and Objective: Renal transplantation is the treatment for end-stage renal disease that offers better quality of life and survival. Among the possible complications that might affect allografts, urolithiasis might have severe consequences, causing acute kidney injury (AKI) or septic events in immunocompromised patients. Allograft stones might be treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The aim of this Cochrane style review was to assess the safety and efficacy of PCNL in patients with renal transplant. Methods: A comprehensive search in the literature was performed including articles between July 1982 and June 2023, with only English original articles selected for this review. Results: The final review encompassed nine articles (108 patients). The mean age was 46.4 ± 8.7 years, with a male:female ratio of 54:44. The average time from transplantation to urolithiasis onset was 47.54 ± 23.9 months. Predominant symptoms upon presentation were AKI (32.3%), followed by urinary tract infection and fever (24.2%), and oliguria (12.9%). The mean stone size was 20.1 ± 7.3 mm, with stones located in the calices or pelvis (41%), ureteropelvic junction (23.1%), or proximal ureter (28.2%). PCNL (22F-30F) was more frequently performed than mini-PCNLs (16F-20F) (52.4% vs 47.6%). Puncture was guided by ultrasound (42.9%), fluoroscopy (14.3%), or both (42.9%). The stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rates were 92.95% (range: 77%-100%) and 5.5%, respectively, with only one major complication reported. Postoperatively, a ureteral stent and nephrostomy were commonly placed in 47%, with four patients needing a second look PCNL. During an average follow-up of 32.5 months, the recurrence rate was 3.7% (4/108), and the mean creatinine level was 1.37 ± 0.28 mg/dL. Conclusions: PCNL remains a safe and effective option in de novo allograft urolithiasis, allowing to treat large stones in one-step surgery. A good SFR is achieved with a low risk of minor complications. These patients should be treated in an endourology center in conjunction with the renal or transplant team.

Effect of Sex on the Oncological Outcomes in Response to Immunotherapy and Antibody-drug Conjugates in Patients with Urothelial and Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review and a Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) herald a transformative era in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) treatment, amid acknowledged sex-based disparities in these cancers. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to identify sex-specific differences in the efficacy of ICI/ADC monotherapy or combination therapies for RCC and TCC survival, in metastatic and adjuvant settings. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted up to October 2023 for English articles on ICIs and ADCs as systemic therapies (ICIs in first-line and adjuvant treatment for RCC, ICIs and ADCs in first- and second-line treatment for TCC). Randomised clinical trials were considered. The primary objective was overall survival (OS) of ICIs and ADCs between males and females. The secondary outcomes included progression-free survival, overall response rate, disease-free survival, and recurrence-free survival. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by sex via odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals compared with controls. Log ORs were used for creating a frequentist NMA. This meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023468632). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Females had an advantage for RCC-adjuvant treatment for atezolizumab (log OR [SE] = -0.57 ± 0.25, p = 0.024) in OS. Males showed a survival advantage in TCC second-line treatment for ADC-Nectin 4 (log OR [SE] = 0.65 ± 0.28, p = 0.02). No other significant results were shown. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The NMA revealed gender-specific variations in ICI and ADC responses for RCC and TCC, offering insights for personalised cancer care and addressing disparities in cancer care and outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this systematic review, we looked at the sex differences for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) for antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors. In our analysis, female and male sex has better overall survival for adjuvant and second-line therapies for RCC and TCC, respectively. Urgent research on gender-specific cancer therapies is imperative.

Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: Guideline of Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease with a potentially dismal prognosis. We systematically compared international guidelines on UTUC to analyze similitudes and differences among them. METHODS: We conducted a search on MEDLINE/PubMed for guidelines related to UTUC from 2010 to the present. In addition, we manually explored the websites of urological and oncological societies and journals to identify pertinent guidelines. We also assessed recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Network, the Canadian Urological Association, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the International Consultation on Bladder Cancer, considering their expertise and experience in the field. RESULTS: Among all the sources, only the American Urologist Association (AUA), European Association of Urology (EAU), and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines specifically report data on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of UTUC. Current analysis reveals several differences between all three sources on diagnostic work-up, patient management, and follow-up. Among all, AUA and EAU guidelines show more detailed indications. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the growing incidence of UTUC, only AUA, EAU, and NCCN guidelines deal with this cancer. Our research depicted high variability in reporting recommendations and opinions. In this regard, we encourage further higher-quality research to gain evidence creating higher grade consensus between guidelines.

Unraveling the BMI paradox in different renal cortical tumors: insights from the INMARC registry.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate impact of body mass index (BMI) on survival across different histologies and stages of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of clear cell (ccRCC) and non-ccRCC. Obesity was defined according to the WHO criteria (non-Asian BMI >30 Kg/m2, Asian BMI >27.5 Kg/m2). Multivariable analysis (MVA) via Cox regression model was conducted for all-cause (ACM), cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 3,880 patients with a median follow-up of 31 (IQR 9-64) months were analyzed. Overall, 1,373 (35.3%) were obese; 2,895 (74.6%) were ccRCC and 985 (25.3%) were non-ccRCC (chRCC 246 [24.9%], pRCC 469 [47.6%] and vhRCC 270 [27.4%]). MVA in ccRCC revealed obesity associated with decreased risk of ACM, CSM and recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, P = 0.044; HR 0.71, P = 0.039; HR 0.73, P = 0.012, respectively), while in non-ccRCC was not associated with decreased risk of ACM, CSM, and recurrence (P = 0.84, P = 0.53, P = 0.84, respectively). Subset analysis in stage IV ccRCC demonstrated obesity as associated with a decreased risk of ACM, CSM, and recurrence (HR 0.68, P = 0.04; HR 0.59, P = 0.01; HR 0.59, P = 0.01, respectively), while in stage I-III ccRCC was not (P = 0.21; P = 0.30; P = 0.19, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings refute a broad "obesity paradox" for RCC. Obesity was not associated with improved survival in non-ccRCC and in nonmetastatic ccRCC, while metastatic ccRCC patients with obesity had improved survival outcomes.

Outcomes and Techniques of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) for Renal Hilar Masses: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.

Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly being employed in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and it is expanding in the field of complex renal tumors. The aim of this systematic review was to consolidate and assess the results of RAPN when dealing with entirely central hilar masses and to examine the various methods used to address the surgical difficulties associated with them. Methods: A thorough literature search in September 2023 across various databases focused on RAPN for renal hilar masses, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The primary goal was to evaluate RAPN's surgical and functional outcomes, with a secondary aim of examining different surgical techniques. Out of 1250 records, 13 full-text manuscripts were reviewed. Results: Evidence is growing in favor of RAPN for renal hilar masses. Despite a predominance of retrospective studies and a lack of long-term data, RAPN shows positive surgical outcomes and preserves renal function without compromising cancer treatment effectiveness. Innovative suturing and clamping methods are emerging in surgical management. Conclusions: RAPN is a promising technique for managing renal hilar masses in RCC, offering effective surgical outcomes and renal function preservation. The study highlights the need for more long-term data and prospective studies to further validate these findings.

Does the Timing of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Impact Outcomes? Analysis of REMARCC Registry Data for Patients Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Versus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

Background and objective: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has been called into question on the basis of clinical trial data from the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era. Comparative analyses of CN for patients treated with immuno-oncology (IO) versus TKI agents are sparse. Our objective was to compare CN timing and outcomes among patients who received TKI versus IO therapy. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients who underwent CN using data from the REMARCC (Registry of Metastatic RCC) database. The cohort was divided into TKI versus IO first-line therapy groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM). Secondary outcomes included cancer-specific mortality (CSM). Multivariable analysis was used to identify factors predictive for ACM and CSM. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze 5-yr overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) with stratification by primary systemic therapy and timing in relation to CN. Key findings and limitations: We analyzed data for 189 patients (148 TKI + CN, 41 IO +CN; median follow-up 23.2 mo). Multivariable analysis revealed that a greater number of metastases (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06; p = 0.015), greater primary tumor size (HR 1.10; p = 0.043), TKI receipt (HR 2.36; p = 0.015), and initiation of systemic therapy after CN (HR 1.49; p = 0.039) were associated with worse ACM. A greater number of metastases at diagnosis (HR 1.07; p = 0.011), greater primary tumor size (HR 1.12; p = 0.018), TKI receipt (HR 5.43; p = 0.004), and initiation of systemic therapy after CN (HR 2.04; p < 0.001) were associated with worse CSM. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed greater 5-yr rates for OS (51% vs 27%; p < 0.001) and CSS (83% vs 30%; p < 0.001) for IO +CN versus TKI + CN. This difference persisted in a subgroup analysis for patients with intermediate or poor risk, with 5-yr OS rates of 50% for IO + CN versus 30% for TKI + CN (p < 0.001). A subanalysis stratified by CN timing revealed better 5-yr rates for OS (50% vs 30%; p = 0.042) and CSS (90% vs 30%, p = 0.019) for delayed CN after IO therapy, but not after TKI therapy. Conclusions and clinical implications: For patients who underwent CN, systemic therapy before CN was associated with better outcomes. In addition, IO therapy was associated with better survival outcomes in comparison to TKI therapy. Our findings question the applicability of clinical trial data from the TKI era to CN in the IO era for mRCC. Patient summary: For patients with metastatic kidney cancer treated with surgery, better survival outcomes were observed for those who also received immunotherapy in comparison to therapy targeting specific proteins in the body (tyrosine kinase inhibitors, TKIs). Immunotherapy or TKI treatment resulted in better outcomes if it was received before rather than after surgery.

Combined Charlson comorbidity/C-Reactive Protein Index Is a Novel Predictor in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer (INMARC) Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictive ability of a novel combined index, Charlson comorbidity index and C-reactive protein (CCI-CRP), for outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and compare predictive outcomes with of CCI-CRP to its separate components and to the UCLA integrated staging system (UISS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed INMARC registry of RCC patients. Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) analysis was fitted to identify threshold defining low-CRP (LCRP) and high-CRP (HCRP). Patients were stratified according to CCI [low-CCI ≤ 3 (LCCI); intermediate-CCI 4-6 (ICCI); high-CCI > 6 (HCCI)] and CRP level. Kaplan-Meier analysis (KMA) was conducted for overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Based on survival analysis distribution we proposed a new stratification: CCI-CRP. Model performance was assessed with ROC/area under the curve (AUC) analysis and compared to CCI and CRP alone, and UISS. RESULTS: We analyzed 2,890 patients (median follow-up 30 months). ROC identified maximum product sensitivity and specificity for CRP at 3.5 mg/L. KMA revealed 5-year OS of 95.6% for LCRP/LCCI, 83% LCRP/ICCI, 73.3% LCRP/HCCI, 62.6% HCRP/LCCI, 51.6% HCRP/ICCI and 40.5% HCRP/HCCI (P < .001). From this distribution, new CCI-CRP is proposed: low CCI-CRP (LCRP/LCCI and LCRP/ICCI), intermediate CCI-CRP (LCRP/HCCI and HCRP/LCCI), and high CCI-CRP (HCRP/ICCI and HCRP/HCCI). AUC for CCI-CRP showed improved performance for predicting OS/CSS vs. CCI alone (0.73 vs. 0.63/0.77 vs. 0.60), CRP alone (0.73 vs. 0.71/0.77 vs. 0.74) and UISS (0.73 vs 0.67/0.77 vs 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: CCI-CRP, exhibits increased prognostic performance for survival outcomes in RCC compared to CCI and CRP alone, and UISS. Further investigation is requisite.

Association of Elevated C-Reactive Protein with Worsened Outcomes in Different Histologies of Renal Cortical Tumors: Analysis of the INMARC Registry.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate relationship between histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and preoperative c-reactive protein (CRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We queried the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer database for patients affected by RCC. Patients were classified according to their histology: benign tumors, clear cell (cc) RCC, chromophobe (ch) RCC, papillary (p) RCC, and variant histology (vh) RCC; and according to CRP (mg/L): low CRP ≤5 and high CRP >5. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM). Secondary outcomes were cancer-specific mortality (CSM), recurrence and association between CRP and histology. Multivariable analysis (MVA) via Cox regression and multivariable logistic regression were fitted to elucidate predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: Total 3902 patients (high CRP n = 1266) were analyzed; median follow up 51 (IQR 20-91) months. On MVA elevated CRP was an independent risk factor associated with increased risk of ACM in benign tumors (HR 5.98, P < .001), ccRCC (HR 2.69, P < .001), chRCC (HR 3.99, P < .001), pRCC (HR 1.76, P = .009) and vhRCC (HR 2.97, P =.007). MVA for CSM showed CRP as risk factor in ccRCC (HR 2.77, P < .001), chRCC (HR 6.16, P = .003) and pRCC (HR 2.29, P = .011), while in vhRCC was not (P = .27). MVA for recurrence reported CRP as risk factor for ccRCC (HR 1.30, P = .013), while in chRCC (P = .33), pRCC (P = .34) and vhRCC (P = .52) was not. On multivariable logistic regression CRP was a predictor of pRCC (OR 1.003, P = .002), while decreasing CRP was associated with benign tumors (OR 0.994, P = .048). CONCLUSION: Elevated CRP was a robust predictor of worsened ACM in all renal cortical neoplasms. While most frequently observed in pRCC patients, elevated CRP was independently associated with worsened CSM in non-vhRCC. Conversely, elevated CRP was least likely to be noted in benign tumors, and elevation in this subgroup of patients should prompt further consideration for surveillance given increased risk of ACM. Further investigation is requisite.

Challenging the Urologist of the Future: Time for a Change?

Physicians need both medical expertise and diverse skills for effective patient care. Adaptability is also key in embracing advances in technology and new techniques. We outline six thought-provoking points to guide the new generation of urologists.