RESUMO
Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block has been shown to be the most effective analgesic technique following shoulder surgery; however, its use is uncommon due to logistical and safety concerns related to ambulatory administration. We prospectively studied 1505 consecutive patients undergoing shoulder surgery who received continuous interscalene analgesia at home. Catheter removal was by the patient between postoperative days two and five. There were no major complications although 27% of patients reported mild dyspnoea, 13% hoarseness and 7% dysphagia. Twelve percent sought medical advice and 2% reported technical issues with the pump or tubing. Complications and technical issues were associated with patient age; weight; use of ultrasound or concomitant nerve stimulation as the endpoint for final needle tip position; local anaesthetic placement via the catheter or needle; whether a catheter-related intervention for pain relief was required in the recovery area; and the type of ambulatory pump. We conclude that this study supports the safety of this underused analgesic technique.
Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio do Plexo Braquial/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Ombro/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Our hypothesis was that deep anaesthesia, as estimated by a low target bispectral index (BIS) of 30-40, would result in less postoperative pain than that achieved at a conventional depth of anaesthesia. METHODS: We undertook a randomized double-blind controlled study at two tertiary teaching hospitals in New Zealand (2010-1) recruiting 135 adult patients ASA I-II presenting for non-emergent surgery under general anaesthesia requiring tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia was maintained with desflurane and a multimodal analgesia regimen comprising fentanyl infusion, i.v. paracetamol, and parecoxib. Patients were randomly assigned to either a low BIS (30-40) group or a high BIS (45-60) group. Desflurane concentrations were titrated to achieve these targets. Postoperative pain was assessed by: the pain on awakening (0-10, verbal rating scale, VRS(awake)) in the post-anaesthetic care unit; pain on activity at 20-24 h after operation (VRS(d1A)); and the rate of morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) usage over the first 24 h. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for any of the pain scores. The median [inter-quartile range (IQR)] VRS(awake) was 4.0 (0-8) for the low and 4.0 (0-8) for the high BIS groups (P=0.56). The median (IQR) VRS(d1A) was 3.0 (1-5) for the low and 3.0 (1.5-4.5) for the high BIS groups (P=0.83). The median PCA morphine consumption in the low BIS group was 0.61 mg h(-1) (0.04-1.5) vs 0.43 mg h(-1) (0-1.59) in the high BIS group (P=0.98). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there is no clinically useful analgesic effect of a deep anaesthesia regimen.