Fast visual adaptation to dim light in a cavity-nesting bird.

Many birds move fast into dark nest cavities forcing the visual system to adapt to low light intensities. Their visual system takes between 15 and 60 min for complete dark adaptation, but little is known about the visual performance of birds during the first seconds in low light intensities. In a forced two-choice behavioural experiment we studied how well budgerigars can discriminate stimuli of different luminance directly after entering a darker environment. The birds made their choices within about 1 s and did not wait to adapt their visual system to the low light intensities. When moving from a bright facility into an environment with 0.5 log unit lower illuminance, the budgerigars detected targets with a luminance of 0.825 cd m-2 on a black background. When moving into an environment with 1.7 or 3.5 log units lower illuminance, they detected targets with luminances between 0.106 and 0.136 cd m-2. In tests with two simultaneously displayed targets, the birds discriminated similar luminance differences between the targets (Weber fraction of 0.41-0.54) in all light levels. Our results support the notion that partial adaptation of bird eyes to the lower illumination occurring within 1 s allows them to safely detect and feed their chicks.

Retinal ganglion cell topography and spatial resolution of two parrot species: budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) and Bourke's parrot (Neopsephotus bourkii).

Retinal ganglion cell (RGC) isodensity maps indicate important regions in an animal's visual field. These maps can also be combined with measures of focal length to estimate the theoretical visual acuity. Here we present the RGC isodensity maps and anatomical spatial resolving power in three budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and two Bourke's parrots (Neopsephotus bourkii). Because RGCs were stacked in several layers, we modified the Nissl staining procedure to assess the cell number in the whole-mounted and cross-sectioned tissue of the same retinal specimen. The retinal topography showed surprising variation; however, both parrot species had an area centralis without discernable fovea. Budgerigars also had a putative area nasalis never reported in birds before. The peak RGC density was 22,300-34,200 cells/mm(2) in budgerigars and 18,100-38,000 cells/mm(2) in Bourke's parrots. The maximum visual acuity based on RGCs and focal length was 6.9 cyc/deg in budgerigars and 9.2 cyc/deg in Bourke's parrots. These results are lower than earlier behavioural estimates. Our findings illustrate that retinal topography is not a very fixed trait and that theoretical visual acuity estimations based on RGC density can be lower than the behavioural performance of the bird.

Dorsal landmark navigation in a Neotropical nocturnal bee.

Bees, ants, and wasps are well known to visually navigate when traveling between their nests and foraging sites. When leaving their nest, landmarks in the vicinity are memorized and used upon return to locate the nest entrance.1,2 The Neotropical nocturnal sweat bee Megalopta genalis navigates under the forest canopy at light intensities ten times dimmer than starlight.3 Despite these dim conditions, Megalopta is able to memorize visual landmarks around the nest entrance in the frontal visual field.4 Even though frontal landmarks can clearly be discerned by Megalopta, the visual feature of greatest contrast in the rainforest at night is actually the dark dorsal silhouette of the distant canopy against the brighter night sky. Several species of ants,5-10 as well as a subsocial shield bug,11 use bright open gaps in the canopy as dorsal landmarks to navigate home while walking. Here we show that Megalopta is also able to distinguish dorsal landmarks during homing, the first flying insect known with this capacity. Megalopta is able to discriminate between differently oriented dorsal black striped patterns, or an "artificial canopy" of black circles, and to use this information to locate its nest entrance. These results suggest that the local foliage patterns created by the canopy against the brighter sky could potentially provide the bee with reliable landmark information for navigation during foraging and homing at night. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Visual acuity of budgerigars for moving targets.

For a bird, it is often vital to visually detect food items, predators, or individuals from the same flock, i.e. moving stimuli of various shapes. Yet, behavioural tests of visual spatial acuity traditionally use stationary gratings as stimuli. We have behaviourally tested the ability of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) to detect a black circular target, moving semi-randomly at 1.69 degrees s-1 against a brighter background. We found a detection threshold of 0.107±0.007 degrees of the visual field for a target size corresponding to a resolution of a grating with a spatial frequency of 4.68 cycles degree-1. This detection threshold is lower than the resolution limit for gratings but similar to the threshold for stationary single objects of the same shape. We conclude that the target acuity of budgerigars for moving single targets, just as for stationary single targets, is lower than their acuity for gratings.

Single target acuity is not higher than grating acuity in a bird, the budgerigar.

We examined the capacity of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) to visually detect dark single targets against a brighter background and established their spatial resolution limit for such targets. While the sampling density of the retina limits the resolution of gratings, target detection is theoretically limited by contrast sensitivity. This allows many animals to detect single targets smaller than their visual resolution limit, but this is not the case for budgerigars. The budgerigars were able to detect a high contrast circular target with a luminance profile of a single period of a sine wave subtending 0.065 degrees of their visual field, corresponding to a spatial acuity of 7.7 cycles degree-1, a measurement in line with the previously measured grating acuity of budgerigars (7.7 and 10 cycles degree-1). This result is different from findings on the spatial acuity of humans, who can detect single targets much smaller than predicted by their acuity for gratings. The low contrast sensitivity of budgerigar vision might be one of the reasons why the single target acuity is not higher than grating acuity. Adding a bright surround to the target did not influence detection threshold significantly. However, the threshold was slightly higher for a target with a square-wave luminance profile than for a target with a sinusoidal luminance profile.