Reconstruction of composite leg defects post-war injury.

BACKGROUND: In a high conflict region, war injuries to the distal lower extremity are a major source of large composite defects involving bone and soft tissues. These defects are at the edge between using a single free flap [osteo-(+/-myo) cutaneous] vs double free flap reconstruction (bone and soft tissue). In this paper, we present our experience and outcomes in treating patients with leg war injury reconstructed using a single free fibula flap. METHODS: Fifteen patients with distal leg composite defects secondary to war injuries were treated between January 2015 and March 2016. All patients were reconstructed using single barrel free fibula osteo-(+/-myo)cutaneous flap where single or double skin paddles were used according to the soft tissue defect requiring coverage. RESULTS: There were no cases of total or partial flap loss. Complications were limited to three cases including traumatic fibula fracture, venous congestion with negative findings, and residual soft tissue defect requiring coverage. There were no cases of wound dehiscence or infection. Mean follow-up time was 418.8 days. Mean bone healing time was nine months after which patients were allowed full weight bearing. CONCLUSION: A single barrel free fibula osteo-(+/-myo)cutaneous flap is a valid and reliable tool for reconstruction composite lower extremity defects post-war injury. Adequate planning of fibula flap soft tissue components (skin, muscle) rearrangement is essential for success in such challenging reconstructions.

Determination of Appropriate Umbilicus Position during Abdominoplasty in Male Patients.

Background: Abdominoplasty techniques are well documented. The ideal position of the umbilicus has, however, received limited attention. Unfortunately, umbilicus position is not universally agreed upon in male cosmetic abdominoplasty. This study was conducted to determine the ideal umbilicus anthropometric measurements in young men, and the relationships between umbilical position and anterior trunk and torso reference points that may be applicable to intraoperative positioning. It is aimed also at investigating whether umbilicus position would be more accurately determined by considering nipple position instead of the abdominal crease, as recently proposed. Methods: Several anthropometric measurements of various anterior abdominal and thoracic landmarks were conducted on 60 young and middle-aged male volunteers and 30 cadavers at São Paulo city. All statistical analysis was completed using Stata software. Results: Of all the measured reference points, a much stronger correlation (0.513) was demonstrated between umbilicus-anterior axillary fold (U-AX) and inter-nipple (N-N) distances with a constant golden number ratio relationship (N-N = U-AX × 0.618) compared with the weak correlation of 0.034 between umbilicus-xiphisternum and umbilicus-abdominal crease. In 75% of volunteers, the calculated U-AX was within ±3 cm of actual measurement, and in 33.33% within ±1 cm. Conclusions: U-AX = 1.618 × N-N equation is more predictive of adequate umbilicus repositioning during abdominoplasty in male patients. Chest and abdomen of men are a single aesthetic unit. Proper positioning of the nipples and umbilicus, as well as harmonious abdominal and torso proportions are critical for an optimal final aesthetic outcome.