Policed Patients: How the Presence of Law Enforcement in the Emergency Department Impacts Medical Care.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine how physicians understand the role of law enforcement in the emergency department (ED) and to identify how the presence of law enforcement officers may impact the delivery of emergency medical care. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured interviews with 20 emergency physicians practicing in county EDs across 3 health care systems in Northern California between November 2017 and September 2018. Participants were recruited using snowball sampling and included 10 board-certified physicians and 10 resident physicians. We analyzed the interview content using grounded theory, where concepts from interview data were coded, grouped by theme, and compared over consecutive interviews to identify recurrent themes. RESULTS: Participants reported interacting frequently with law enforcement officers while treating patients. Most participants characterized their experiences with law enforcement as "mixed" or "variable." Positive interactions with officers, who were described as helpful and collegial, contrasted with instances in which respondents felt police presence led to interruptions in treatment, breaches in health privacy, and potentially diminished patient trust. Participants reported that, at times, the authority of officers in the ED felt unclear and ill-defined, leading to contentious interactions between officers and health care personnel. CONCLUSION: Lack of clear definition of the role of law enforcement officers in the ED may lead to contentious interactions with emergency physicians. Further research on the medical impacts of police presence in health care settings and on best practices for mitigating negative impacts is needed.

The DISTANCE study: Determining the impact of social distancing on trauma epidemiology during the COVID-19 epidemic-An interrupted time-series analysis.

BACKGROUND: The large-scale social distancing efforts to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission have dramatically changed human behaviors associated with traumatic injuries. Trauma centers have reported decreases in trauma volume, paralleled by changes in injury mechanisms. We aimed to quantify changes in trauma epidemiology at an urban Level I trauma center in a county that instituted one of the earliest shelter-in-place orders to inform trauma care during future pandemic responses. METHODS: A single-center interrupted time-series analysis was performed to identify associations of shelter-in-place with trauma volume, injury mechanisms, and patient demographics in San Francisco, California. To control for short-term trends in trauma epidemiology, weekly level data were analyzed 6 months before shelter-in-place. To control for long-term trends, monthly level data were analyzed 5 years before shelter-in-place. RESULTS: Trauma volume decreased by 50% in the week following shelter-in-place (p < 0.01), followed by a linear increase each successive week (p < 0.01). Despite this, trauma volume for each month (March-June 2020) remained lower compared with corresponding months for all previous 5 years (2015-2019). Pediatric trauma volume showed similar trends with initial decreases (p = 0.02) followed by steady increases (p = 0.05). Reductions in trauma volumes were due entirely to changes in nonviolent injury mechanisms, while violence-related injury mechanisms remained unchanged (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Although the shelter-in-place order was associated with an overall decline in trauma volume, violence-related injuries persisted. Delineating and addressing underlying factors driving persistent violence-related injuries during shelter-in-place orders should be a focus of public health efforts in preparation for future pandemic responses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological study, level III.