Repeat resection for recurrent glioblastoma in the temozolomide era: a real-world multi-centre study.

INTRODUCTION: In contrast to standard-of-care treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma, there is limited consensus on therapy upon disease progression. The role of resection for recurrent glioblastoma remains unclear. This study aimed to identify factors for overall survival (OS) and post-progression survival (PPS) as well as to validate an existing prediction model. METHODS: This was a multi-centre retrospective study that reviewed consecutive adult patients from 2006 to 2019 that received a repeat resection for recurrent glioblastoma. The primary endpoint was PPS defined as from the date of second surgery until death. RESULTS: 1032 glioblastoma patients were identified and 190 (18%) underwent resection for recurrence. Patients that had second surgery were more likely to be younger (<70 years) (adjusted OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.6), to have non-eloquent region tumours (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.6) and received temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (aOR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1-0.4). Resection for recurrent tumour was an independent predictor for OS (aOR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3-1.7) (mOS: 16.9 months versus 9.8 months). For patients that previously received temozolomide chemoradiotherapy and subsequent repeat resection (137, 13%), the median PPS was 9.0 months (IQR: 5.0-17.5). Independent PPS predictors for this group were a recurrent tumour volume of >50cc (aOR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4-0.9), local recurrence (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-3.3) and 5-ALA fluorescence-guided resection during second surgery (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.8). A National Institutes of Health Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme Scale score of 0 conferred an mPPS of 10.0 months, a score of 1-2, 9.0 months and a score of 3, 4.0 months (log-rank test, p-value < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Surgery for recurrent glioblastoma can be beneficial in selected patients and carries an acceptable morbidity rate. The pattern of recurrence influenced PPS and the NIH Recurrent GBM Scale was a reliable prognostication tool.

Post-transplantation primary central nervous system lymphoma in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and prolonged use of immunosuppressant.

Post-transplantation primary central nervous system lymphoma is an uncommon and fatal post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Such lymphomas have been described in only a few case series in the literature. The incidence of this condition is rising with improved survival after organ transplantation. A case of post-transplantation primary central nervous system lymphoma in a young Chinese woman with systemic lupus erythematosus is described here. She presented with right-sided weakness and memory loss after tooth extraction 2 weeks before admission. Contrast computed tomography of the brain demonstrated a contrast rim-enhancing lesion over the left frontal lobe. With a history of recent dental procedure, long-term immunosuppressive therapy and computed tomography findings, cerebral abscess was highly suspected. Emergency operation was performed. Histopathology showed post-transplantation primary central nervous system lymphoma, with cells positive for B-cell marker CD20. Immunosuppressant was stopped and she was treated with radiotherapy and rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody). She remained disease-free at 16 months. Post-transplantation primary central nervous system lymphoma is rare with variable presentation and radiological features. We believe rituximab may have a role in the treatment of such lymphomas.

AB011. A propensity-score matched prospective study on the impact of tumour treating fields (TTF) on overall survival and quality of life in newly diagnosed WHO grade 4 astrocytoma patients.

BACKGROUND: World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 astrocytoma is a high-grade brain tumour in adults. Tumour treating fields (TTF) has been shown to improve overall survival (OS). Few studies have explored quality-of-life (QoL) in these patients. This study aims to assess the QoL of TTF patients and OS. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study of adult patients diagnosed with WHO grade 4 astrocytoma from 2018 to 2023 receiving TTF for >1 month after completing standard therapy. A propensity-score matched comparison with a 1:2 ratio with historical control was performed for OS analysis. The patients completed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-30/BN20 questionnaires before TTF and at 3-month interval. Primary outcomes included OS, and secondary outcomes included QoL and TTF-associated adverse effects at 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were reviewed, with TTF patients (n=47, 33%) and propensity-score matched controls (n=94). The mean duration of TTF use was 10±8 months. The mean age of the TTF group was 54±13 years, and for the control group 52±13 years. Sixty percent (n=28) were male, similar to the control group with 71% (n=67) (P=0.16). Seventy-two percent of TTF patients had preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≥80, while controls had 70% (P=0.79). Five (11%) TTF patients and 8 (9%) controls were IDH1 mutant (P=0.70). Twenty (43%) TTF patients and 42 (45%) controls were O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter (pMGMT) methylated (P=0.81). Twenty-one (45%) of TTF patients and 55 (59%) of controls had gross total resection (P=0.72). After adjusting for independent predictors for OS, the median OS of the TTF group was 22.4 months [interquartile range (IQR): 18.6-26.5 months], significantly longer than the control group (17.2 months; IQR: 12.1-22.3 months) (log-rank test: P=0.01). Forty-seven TTF patients and 40 control patients completed EORTC questionnaires. There was no difference for EORTC functional and symptom scores between the TTF and control group [P=0.45, analysis of variance (ANOVA)] at 3 months. Thirty-two (67%) of TTF patients reported associated RTOG grade I scalp dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: TTF for WHO grade 4 astrocytoma patients is an independent predictor for OS. QoL between the groups was similar, and overall QoL over time for TTF patients was not affected. TTF is a novel and effective outpatient treatment with minimal adverse effects.

Patterns of care and survival of Chinese glioblastoma patients in the temozolomide era: a Hong Kong population-level analysis over a 14-year period.

Background: The aim of this study is to address the paucity of epidemiological data regarding the characteristics, treatment patterns and survival outcomes of Chinese glioblastoma patients. Methods: This was a population-level study of Hong Kong adult (>18 years) Chinese patients with newly diagnosed histologically confirmed glioblastoma between 2006 and 2019. The age standardized incidence rate (ASIR), patient-, tumor- treatment-related characteristics, overall survival (OS) as well as its predictors were determined. Results: One thousand and ten patients with a median follow-up of 10.0 months were reviewed. The ASIR of glioblastoma was 1.0 per 100 000 population with no significant change during the study period. The mean age was 57 + 14 years. The median OS was 10.6 months (IQR: 5.2-18.4). Independent predictors for survival were: Karnofsky performance score >80 (adjusted OR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.6-0.9), IDH-1 mutant (aOR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5-0.9) or MGMT methylated (aOR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5-0.8) glioblastomas, gross total resection (aOR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.5-0.8) and temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (aOR 0.4; 95% CI: 0.3-0.6). Despite the significant increased administration of temozolomide chemoradiotherapy from 39% (127/326) of patients in 2006-2010 to 63% (227/356) in 2015-2019 (P-value < .001), median OS did not improve (2006-2010: 10.3 months vs 2015-2019: 11.8 months) (OR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.9-1.3). Conclusions: The incidence of glioblastoma in the Chinese general population is low. We charted the development of neuro-oncological care of glioblastoma patients in Hong Kong during the temozolomide era. Although there was an increased adoption of temozolomide chemoradiotherapy, a corresponding improvement in survival was not observed.