RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The available data for the safety and efficacy of repeat peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are almost exclusively from European centers. We present an updated experience with repeat PRRT in a cohort of US patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) at our NET center of excellence. METHODS: We used our single-center longitudinal NET registry to identify patients who had been previously treated with at least one dose of PRRT (PRRT 1, either 177Lu DOTATATE or 90Y DOTATOC) and following radiographic disease progression were re-treated with a second course of PRRT (PRRT 2). We reviewed patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, objective response rates, and toxicities after PRRT 1 and PRRT 2. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were included in the analysis. 45.5% (5/11) of patients received 177Lu DOTATATE PRRT only, both for PRRT1 and PRRT 2, while 54.5% (6/11) of patients received 90Y DOTATOC PRRT for PRRT1. At first restaging scan after PRRT2 (3-6 months), 18.2% (2/11), 36.4% (4/11), and 27.3% (3/11) of patients had PR, SD, and PD, respectively; 2/11 patients (18.2%) died before the first restaging scan. Therefore, 5/11 (45.5%) patients were noted to have disease progression. Median PFS for PRRT1 was 25.4 months and median PFS for PRRT2 was 13.1 months (p = 0.0001). We did not find a statistically significant difference between the occurrence of short and long-term hematological toxicities as well as renal toxicity after PRRT1 and PRRT2. CONCLUSION: We show that repeat PRRT may benefit select patients and have an acceptable safety profile. In our cohort, PFS was significantly lower after PRRT2 as compared to PRRT1.
RESUMO
Background: Screening for carcinoid heart disease (CHD), has historically lacked consensus expert guidelines. In 2017, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) released expert recommendations for CHD screening among NET patients to improve CHD detection. The objective of this study is to evaluate CHD screening trends and utility of screening guidelines over more than two decades at a single tertiary care center. Materials and methods: Patients with NETs referred for abdominal surgical evaluation at a single tertiary care center were included, 300 patients from 1999 to 2018 and 34 patients from 2021 to 2022. Lab values for the following NANETS-proposed criteria at any point during their treatments were recorded: NETs with liver metastasis, blood serotonin >5 times upper limit of normal (>1000 ng/mL), NT-ProBNP >260 pg/mL and clinical features suggestive of CHD. Results: 85 % (285/334) of patients included in this study met one or more expert-recommended CHD screening criteria. However, 40 % (132/285) of patients meeting one or more criteria received CHD screening via echocardiogram at some point following NET diagnosis. While rates of screening for patients increased from the first decade to the second decade (32 % vs 40.6 %), the rates were much higher after guideline publication (70 %, 24/34). Furthermore, patients meeting multiple screening criteria were more likely to have evidence of structural valve disease. Conclusions: Results of this study suggest that utilization of these four expert-recommended screening criteria have greatly increased rates of CHD screening via echocardiogram and could assist in improving early CHD detection, especially for patients meeting multiple criteria.