Connective tissue growth factor inhibits gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis by blocking integrin α3ß1-dependent adhesion.

BACKGROUND: Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) plays important roles in normal and pathological conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of CTGF in peritoneal metastasis as well as the underlying mechanism in gastric cancer progression. METHODS: CTGF expression levels for wild-type and stable overexpression clones were determined by Western blotting and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR). Univariate and multivariate analyses, immunohistochemistry, and survival probability analyses were performed on gastric cancer patients. The extracellular matrix components involved in CTGF-regulated adhesion were determined. Recombinant CTGF was added to cells or coinoculated with gastric cancer cells into mice to evaluate its therapeutic potential. RESULTS: CTGF overexpression and treatment with the recombinant protein significantly inhibited cell adhesion. In vivo peritoneal metastasis demonstrated that CTGF-stable transfectants markedly decreased the number and size of tumor nodules in the mesentery. Statistical analysis of gastric cancer patient data showed that patients expressing higher CTGF levels had earlier TNM staging and a higher survival probability after the surgery. Integrin α3ß1 was the cell adhesion molecule mediating gastric cancer cell adhesion to laminin, and blocking of integrin α3ß1 prevented gastric cancer cell adhesion to recombinant CTGF. Coimmunoprecipitation results indicated that CTGF binds to integrin α3. Coinoculation of recombinant CTGF and gastric cancer cell lines in mice showed effective inhibition of peritoneal dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis is mediated through integrin α3ß1 binding to laminin, and CTGF effectively blocks the interaction by binding to integrin α3ß1, thus demonstrating the therapeutic potential of recombinant CTGF in gastric cancer patients.

Predictive and prognostic values of tau and ERCC1 in advanced breast cancer patients treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin.

OBJECTIVE: We studied tau and excision repair cross-complementing 1 expression to evaluate their predictive values in advanced breast carcinoma patients. METHODS: Patients treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin as the first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. The expression levels of tau and excision repair cross-complementing 1 were assessed by immunohistochemistry and examined for their associations with treatment response and survival. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included in this study. Despite the strong association between tau expression and lower histological grade and estrogen receptor expression, tau expression remained an independent predictor for a lower response rate in multivariate analysis (odd ratio = 0.24, P = 0.02). However, tau expression was a predictor for longer overall survival in both univariate analysis (median, 57.5 vs. 30.4 months, P = 0.02) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 0.36, P = 0.008). Excision repair cross-complementing 1 was not associated with treatment response or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Tau expression but not excision repair cross-complementing 1 in advanced breast cancer predicts poor response to combination chemotherapy of paclitaxel and cisplatin. However, tau expression is significantly associated with longer overall survival.

CYP19 genetic polymorphism haplotype AASA is associated with a poor prognosis in premenopausal women with lymph node-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Given the critical role of CYP19 in estrogen synthesis, we investigated the influence of CYP19 gene polymorphisms on the clinical outcome of lymph node- (LN-) negative, hormone receptor- (HR-) positive early breast cancers. Genotyping for the CYP19 polymorphisms rs4646 (A/C), rs1065779 (A/C), CYP19 (TTTA)n (short allele/long (S/L) allele using the 7 TTTA repeat polymorphism as the cut-off), and rs1870050 (A/C) was performed on 296 patients with LN-negative, HR-positive breast cancers. All patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy. Associations were examined between these 4 genotypes and 6 common haplotypes of CYP19 and distant disease-free survival (DDFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Patients were divided into the 6 subhaplotypes of CCLA (41.1%), AASA (17.1%), CASA (11.9%), CCLC (8.9%), CCSA (7.5%), AASC (8.9%), and others (4.6%). In premenopausal patients, haplotype AASA was significantly associated with a poor DDFS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 3.3; P = 0.001), DFS (aHR, 2.5; P = 0.0008), and OS (aHR, 2.9; P = 0.0004) after adjusting for age, tumor size, tumor grade, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, chemotherapy, pathology, adjuvant hormone therapy, menopausal status, and radiotherapy. Furthermore, haplotype AASA remained a negative prognostic factor for premenopausal patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of DDFS (aHR, 4.5; P = 0.0005), DFS (HR, 3.2; P = 0.003), and OS (HR, 6.4; P = 0.0009). However, in postmenopausal patients, haplotype AASA was not associated with a poor prognosis, whereas the AASC haplotype was significantly associated with a poor DFS (aHR, 3.1; P = 0.03) and OS (aHR, 4.4; P = 0.01). Our results indicate that, in patients with LN-negative, HR-positive breast cancers, genetic polymorphism haplotype AASA is associated with poor survival of premenopausal women but does not affect survival of postmenopausal women.

Comprehensive locoregional treatment and systemic therapy for postmastectomy isolated locoregional recurrence.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of comprehensive locoregional therapy and systemic therapy on disease control and survival for postmastectomy patients with isolated locoregional recurrence (ILRR). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 115 postmastectomy breast cancer patients treated for ILRR were included. Of the patients, 98 underwent comprehensive locoregional treatment (local tumor excision plus postoperative radiotherapy), and 17 received definitive radiotherapy alone. Involved-field radiotherapy was given to 69 patients, whereas entire-field radiotherapy (both involved-field and elective-field, involving the chest wall and regional lymphatics) was given to 46 patients. Systemic therapy consisting of hormone therapy, chemotherapy, or both was given to 69% of patients. RESULTS: Patients treated with comprehensive locoregional treatment had a significantly better 5-year invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and overall survival (OS) after ILRR than patients treated with definitive radiotherapy alone (IDFS rate, 51% vs. 16%, p = 0.006; OS rate, 62% vs. 37%, p = 0.017). Patients with the most comprehensive locoregional treatment (recurrent tumor excision and entire-field radiotherapy) and systemic therapy had a significantly better 5-year IDFS and OS than patients given either treatment or neither treatment (IDFS rate, 52% vs. 39%, p = 0.011; OS rate, 63% vs. 50%, p = 0.026). Multivariate analysis revealed that positive axillary lymph nodes, Grade III tumor, negative estrogen and progesterone receptor status at primary diagnosis, disease-free interval of less than 2 years, and less comprehensive locoregional treatment were significantly associated with worse IDFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Use of comprehensive locoregional therapy and systemic therapy can achieve good survival outcome in a substantial proportion of postmastectomy patients with ILRR.

The CYP19 TTTA repeat polymorphism is related to the prognosis of premenopausal stage I-II and operable stage III breast cancers.

PURPOSE: Given the critical role of the CYP19 gene, encoding aromatase, in estrogen synthesis and the association of the estrogen level with its TTTA repeat polymorphism, the potential influence of this polymorphism on breast cancer survival, and hence management, deserves further study. METHODS: Genotyping for the CYP19 TTTA repeat polymorphism was performed on 482 stage I-II and operable stage III Taiwanese breast cancer patients. Patients with more than seven TTTA repeats in either allele of CYP19 were defined as having the long allele. We correlated clinical variables and CYP19 genotypic polymorphism with outcome. RESULTS: In hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancers, premenopausal patients with the long allele of the CYP19 polymorphism had a significantly higher overall survival (OS) rate (8-year, 89% versus 68%; p= .003) than those without it. This difference was further demonstrated by a multivariate analysis (OS hazard ratio, 1.53; p= .041). In postmenopausal women or patients with HR-negative breast cancer, there was no significant difference in OS between patients with or without the long allele. In premenopausal women with HR-positive cancers, adequate intensity adjuvant chemotherapy did not achieve a greater OS rate than suboptimal chemotherapy in patients with the long allele, but it resulted in a significantly higher OS rate (p= .011) than suboptimal chemotherapy in women without the long allele. CONCLUSIONS: The CYP19 TTTA repeat polymorphism is associated with survival in premenopausal women, but not in postmenopausal women, with HR-positive breast cancers. Premenopausal women with the long allele have a greater survival rate and may not gain benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Expression of PEA3 and lack of correlation between PEA3 and HER-2/neu expression in breast cancer.

The ETS protein PEA3 functions as a transcription factor to regulate gene expression. Although members of the ETS family have been reported to be involved in tumor progression, ectopic expression of PEA3 has been shown to suppress tumor formation. Despite several studies demonstrated frequent expression of PEA3 and its high association with HER-2/neu and have suggested a potential role of PEA3 in breast cancer, contradictory result has shown that the PEA3 was associated with better survival rate in breast cancer. In the current study, we address this discrepancy by examining the expression of PEA3 and HER-2/neu on 289 archived breast cancer tumor tissues and their correlation with clinicopathologic factors and prognosis. The staining of PEA3 was further validated by in situ hybridization for PEA3 mRNA. We found PEA3 was positive in 22.2% (64/289) of all cases and only 25.6% (21/82) of HER-2/neu-overexpressing cases showed co-expression of PEA3. In contrast to HER-2/neu, PEA3 expression was not correlated with prognosis or major clinicopathologic factors, except for a negative correlation with lymphovascular permeation ( p=0.007). This study demonstrates that PEA3 expression is not correlated with HER-2/neu expression in breast cancer tumor tissues, nor is it associated with adverse clinicopathologic factors or prognosis.

Phase II trial combining paclitaxel with 24-hour infusion cisplatin for chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Both paclitaxel and cisplatin are active as second-line chemotherapy for patients with breast carcinoma. A synergistic cytotoxicity of these two drugs has been demonstrated in vitro. This study sought to determine the efficacy of combining these two drugs in the treatment of chemotherapy-naïve patients with breast carcinoma. METHODS: The inclusion criteria for the study were 1) women with histologically proven breast carcinoma; 2) locally advanced disease, as defined by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage T4 (locally advanced breast carcinoma [LABC]) or clinically proven metastases (metastatic breast carcinoma [MBC]); and 3) no prior cytotoxic chemotherapy. The regimen consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) intravenously by 3-hour infusion immediately followed by cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) intravenously by 24-hour infusion on Day 1 and repeated every 3 weeks. After a maximal response to chemotherapy was achieved, patients with LABC underwent resection of their primary tumor if the procedure was not contraindicated. RESULTS: From July, 1999 to January, 2001, 46 patients were enrolled into this study (28 patients with LABC and 18 patients with MBC). Their median age was 49.5 years (range, 29.8-65.5 years). A total of 205 cycles of chemotherapy were given. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 45 patients were evaluable for response. There were 3 complete responses (CRs) and 24 partial responses (PRs), for an overall response rate of 58.7% (95% confidence interval, 44.5-72.9%). Grade 4 hypersensitivity (asthma) to paclitaxel occurred in one patient. Grade 3-4 nausea and emesis and Grade 3-4 myelosuppression occurred in six patients and four patients, respectively. Of the 28 patients with LABC, 2 patients achieved a CR, and 14 patients achieved a PR. Twenty-seven patients underwent mastectomy patients after chemotherapy. A pathologic CR was documented in one patient. Postoperatively, 23 patients with LABC received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 18 patients with LABC received adjuvant radiotherapy. During a median follow-up of 14.6 months, 5 of 28 patients with LABC developed recurrent disease, and 2 patients died of progressive disease, whereas 3 of 18 patients with MBC died of progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion and cisplatin by 24-hour infusion appears to be an active and well-tolerated regimen for chemotherapy-naïve patients with LABC or MBC.