A mesenchymal-like ZEB1(+) niche harbors dorsal radial glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive stem cells in the spinal cord.

In humans and rodents the adult spinal cord harbors neural stem cells located around the central canal. Their identity, precise location, and specific signaling are still ill-defined and controversial. We report here on a detailed analysis of this niche. Using microdissection and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic mice, we demonstrate that neural stem cells are mostly dorsally located GFAP(+) cells lying ependymally and subependymally that extend radial processes toward the pial surface. The niche also harbors doublecortin protein (Dcx)(+) Nkx6.1(+) neurons sending processes into the lumen. Cervical and lumbar spinal cord neural stem cells maintain expression of specific rostro-caudal Hox gene combinations and the niche shows high levels of signaling proteins (CD15, Jagged1, Hes1, differential screening-selected gene aberrative in neuroblastoma [DAN]). More surprisingly, the niche displays mesenchymal traits such as expression of epithelial-mesenchymal-transition zinc finger E-box-binding protein 1 (ZEB1) transcription factor and smooth muscle actin. We found ZEB1 to be essential for neural stem cell survival in vitro. Proliferation within the niche progressively ceases around 13 weeks when the spinal cord reaches its final size, suggesting an active role in postnatal development. In addition to hippocampus and subventricular zone niches, adult spinal cord constitutes a third central nervous system stem cell niche with specific signaling, cellular, and structural characteristics that could possibly be manipulated to alleviate spinal cord traumatic and degenerative diseases.

Head-tail patterning of the vertebrate embryo: one, two or many unresolved problems?

When, where and how is the head-tail axis of the embryo set up during development? These are such fundamental and intensely studied questions that one might expect them to have been answered long ago. Not so; we still understand very little about the cellular or molecular mechanisms that lead to the orderly arrangement of body elements along the head-tail axis in vertebrates. In this paper, we outline some of the major outstanding problems and controversies and try to identify some reasons why it has been so difficult to resolve this important issue.

Mesenchymal stem cells from different organs are characterized by distinct topographic Hox codes.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are multipotent cells found as part of the stromal compartment of the bone marrow and in many other organs. They can be identified in vitro as CFU-F (colony forming unit-fibroblast) based on their ability to form adherent colonies of fibroblast-like cells in culture. MSC expanded in vitro retain characteristics appropriate to their tissue of origin. This is reflected in their propensity for differentiating towards specific lineages, and their capacity to generate, upon retransplantation in vivo, a stroma supporting typical lineages of hematopoietic cells. Hox genes encode master regulators of regional specification and organ development in the embryo and are widely expressed in the adult. We investigated whether they could be involved in determining tissue-specific properties of MSC. Hox gene expression profiles of individual CFU-F colonies derived from various organs and anatomical locations were generated, and the relatedness between these profiles was determined using hierarchical cluster analysis. This revealed that CFU-F have characteristic Hox expression signatures that are heterogeneous but highly specific for their anatomical origin. The topographic specificity of these Hox codes is maintained during differentiation, suggesting that they are an intrinsic property of MSC. Analysis of Hox codes of CFU-F from vertebral bone marrow suggests that MSC originate over a large part of the anterioposterior axis, but may not originate from prevertebral mesenchyme. These data are consistent with a role for Hox proteins in specifying cellular identity of MSC.

Targeted deletion of a branchial arch-specific enhancer reveals a role of dHAND in craniofacial development.

The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor dHAND is expressed in the mesenchyme of branchial arches and the developing heart. Mice homozygous for a dHAND (Hand2) null mutation die early in embryogenesis from cardiac abnormalities, precluding analysis of the potential role of dHAND in branchial arch development. Two independent enhancers control expression of dHAND in the heart and branchial arches. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) signaling regulates the branchial arch enhancer and is required for dHAND expression in the branchial arches. To determine the potential role of dHAND in branchial arch development and to assess the role of the ET-1-dependent enhancer in dHAND regulation in vivo, we deleted this enhancer by homologous recombination. Mice lacking the dHAND branchial arch enhancer died perinatally and exhibited a spectrum of craniofacial defects that included cleft palate, mandibular hypoplasia and cartilage malformations. Expression of dHAND was abolished in the ventolateral regions of the first and second branchial arches in these mutant mice, but expression was retained in a ventral domain where the related transcription factor eHAND is expressed. We conclude that dHAND plays an essential role in patterning and development of skeletal elements derived from the first and second branchial arches and that there are heterogeneous populations of cells in the branchial arches that rely on different cis-regulatory elements for activation of dHAND transcription.

Misexpression of dHAND induces ectopic digits in the developing limb bud in the absence of direct DNA binding.

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors control developmental decisions in a wide range of embryonic cell types. The HLH motif mediates homo- and heterodimerization, which juxtaposes the basic regions within the dimeric complex to form a bipartite DNA binding domain that recognizes a DNA consensus sequence known as an E-box. eHAND and dHAND (also known as HAND1 and HAND2) are closely related bHLH proteins that control cardiac, craniofacial and limb development. Within the developing limb, dHAND expression encompasses the zone of polarizing activity in the posterior region, where it has been shown to be necessary and sufficient to induce the expression of the morphogen sonic hedgehog. Misexpression of dHAND in the anterior compartment of the limb bud induces ectopic expression of sonic hedgehog, with resulting preaxial polydactyly and mirror image duplications of posterior digits. To investigate the potential transcriptional mechanisms involved in limb patterning by dHAND, we have performed a structure-function analysis of the protein in cultured cells and ectopically expressed dHAND mutant proteins in the developing limbs of transgenic mice. We show that an N-terminal transcriptional activation domain, and the bHLH region, are required for E-box-dependent transcription in vitro. Remarkably, however, digit duplication by dHAND requires neither the transcriptional activation domain nor the basic region, but only the HLH motif. eHAND has a similar limb patterning activity to dHAND in these misexpression experiments, indicating a conserved function of the HLH regions of these proteins. These findings suggest that dHAND may act via novel transcriptional mechanisms mediated by protein-protein interactions independent of direct DNA binding.

dHAND-Cre transgenic mice reveal specific potential functions of dHAND during craniofacial development.

Most of the bone, cartilage, and connective tissue of the craniofacial region arise from cephalic neural crest cells. Presumably, patterning differences in crest cells are a result of regional action of transcription factors within the developing pharyngeal arches. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor dHAND/HAND2 is expressed throughout much of the neural crest-derived mesenchyme of the pharyngeal arches, suggesting that it plays a crucial role in craniofacial development. However, targeted inactivation of the dHAND gene results in embryonic lethality by E10.5 due to vascular defects, preventing further analysis of the role of dHAND in cephalic neural crest cell development. In order to examine putative roles of dHAND during later stages of embryogenesis, we have used a transgenic lineage marker approach, in which a portion of the dHAND upstream region containing an enhancer that directs dHAND expression to the pharyngeal arches is used to drive Cre recombinase expression. By crossing these dHAND-Cre transgenic mice with R26R mice, we can follow the fate of cells that expressed dHAND at any time during development by examining beta-galactosidase activity. We show that dHAND is first expressed in postmigratory cephalic neural crest cells within the pharyngeal arches. In older embryos, beta-galactosidase-labeled cells are observed in most of the neural crest-derived lower jaw skeleton and surrounding connective tissues. However, labeled cells only contribute to substructures within the middle ear, indicating that our transgene is not globally expressed in cephalic neural crest cells within the pharyngeal arches. Moreover, dHAND-Cre mice will provide a valuable tool for tissue-specific inactivation of gene expression in multiple tissue types of neural crest origin.