Aligning priorities in Ethiopian health finance: How do the essential health services package and health benefit plans compare?

Priority setting is a key function of health systems in low- and middle-income countries that seek to achieve universal health coverage. Essential health services packages (EHSPs) and health benefit plans are two types of instruments used in setting health care priorities. Both instruments exist in Ethiopia, but little is known about how they are aligned. To gain insights into the evolution, purpose, policy objectives, and governance of the EHSP, community-based health insurance (CBHI), and social health insurance (SHI) in Ethiopia, we conducted a case study. This included a desk review of relevant documents as well as qualitative analysis of key informant interviews conducted with 15 leading health finance experts in Addis Ababa. Interviewees understood the EHSP to be a key priority-setting instrument in the country by coordinating the activities of health system stakeholders, and guaranteeing the right of citizens to a basic level of care. Community-based health insurance and SHI were described as mechanisms for the government to expand health coverage and provide financial protection. Interviewees acknowledged that Ethiopia had drawn on the experience of other countries when designing health benefit plans, but contrasted Ethiopia's experience with that of other countries. We found that in Ethiopia, the EHSP, CBHI, and SHI are not explicitly aligned. We propose that EHSPs play an important role in early stages of health systems development. However, as governments develop health benefit plans with expansive packages of services, the importance of EHSPs becomes less clear.

A scoping review of the uses and institutionalisation of knowledge for health policy in low- and middle-income countries.

There is growing interest in how different forms of knowledge can strengthen policy-making in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) health systems. Additionally, health policy and systems researchers are increasingly aware of the need to design effective institutions for supporting knowledge utilisation in LMICs. To address these interwoven agendas, this scoping review uses the Arskey and O'Malley framework to review the literature on knowledge utilisation in LMIC health systems, using eight public health and social science databases. Articles that described the process for how knowledge was used in policy-making, specified the type of knowledge used, identified actors involved (individual, organisation or professional), and were set in specific LMICs were included. A total of 53 articles, from 1999 to 2016 and representing 56 countries, were identified. The majority of articles in this review presented knowledge utilisation as utilisation of research findings, and to a lesser extent routine health system data, survey data and technical advice. Most of the articles centered on domestic public sector employees and their interactions with civil society representatives, international stakeholders or academics in utilising epistemic knowledge for policy-making in LMICs. Furthermore, nearly all of the articles identified normative dimensions of institutionalisation. While there is some evidence of how different uses and institutionalisation of knowledge can strengthen health systems, the evidence on how these processes can ultimately improve health outcomes remains unclear. Further research on the ways in which knowledge can be effectively utilised and institutionalised is needed to advance the collective understanding of health systems strengthening and enhance evidence-informed policy formulation.

Governing multisectoral action for health in low- and middle-income countries.

Kumanan Rasanathan and colleagues argue that the potential of multisectoral collaboration for improving health remains untapped in many low- and middle-income countries.

Impact of conditional cash transfers on maternal and newborn health.

Maternal and newborn health (MNH) is a high priority for global health and is included among the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). However, the slow decline in maternal and newborn mortality jeopardizes achievements of the targets of MDGs. According to UNICEF, 60 million women give birth outside of health facilities, and family planning needs are satisfied for only 50%. Further, skilled birth attendance and the use of antenatal care are most inequitably distributed in maternal and newborn health interventions in low- and middle-income countries. Conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been shown to increase health service utilization among the poorest but little is written on the effects of such programmes on maternal and newborn health. We carried out a systematic review of studies on CCT that report maternal and newborn health outcomes, including studies from 8 countries. The CCT programmes have increased antenatal visits, skilled attendance at birth, delivery at a health facility, and tetanus toxoid vaccination for mothers and reduced the incidence of low birthweight. The programmes have not had a significant impact on fertility while the impact on maternal and newborn mortality has not been well-documented thus far. Given these positive effects, we make the case for further investment in CCT programmes for maternal and newborn health, noting gaps in knowledge and providing recommendations for better design and evaluation of such programmes. We recommend more rigorous impact evaluations that document impact pathways and take factors, such as cost-effectiveness, into account.