Thromboelastography versus thromboelastometry for unfractionated heparin monitoring in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Background: Monitoring the anticoagulant effect of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients is complex but critically important to balance the risks of treatment related bleeding and circuit thrombosis. While guidelines recommend using more than one method to monitor UFH activity, the use of thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to monitor UFH in ECMO patients has not been investigated in detail.Methods: This is an observational, single-center retrospective study looking at adult ECMO patients on UFH that had ROTEM and thromboelastography (TEG) tests obtained concurrently. A total of 20 samples were obtained from nine patients during the study period, seven of which were on veno-arterial (VA) ECMO and two of which were on veno-venous (VV) ECMO.Results: Under institutional standard operating practice, when TEG and/or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were considered therapeutic, intrinsic thromboelastometry clotting time (INTEM CT) was only 1.2 times higher than the normal range. TEG based monitoring compared to aPTT based monitoring tended to result in lower anti-Xa levels and less intensive anticoagulation. For the total cohort, bleeding events, driven by the need for blood transfusions, were more common compared to ischemic events (77% vs 11%; p = 0.02).Conclusion: INTEM CT tended to be less sensitive to lower doses of UFH with a value of 1.2 times higher than the normal range when aPTT and/or TEG were considered therapeutic. Due to the relative insensitivity of ROTEM, our institution decided to continue to use TEG instead of ROTEM. Larger, multicenter trials may be helpful to validate these findings.

Readmissions After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Influence of Prosthesis Type.

INTRODUCTION: Prosthesis choice during aortic valve replacement (AVR) weighs lifelong anticoagulation with mechanical valves (M-AVR) against structural valve degeneration in bioprosthetic valves (B-AVR). METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify patients who underwent isolated surgical AVR between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018, stratifying by prothesis type. Propensity score matching was used to compare risk-adjusted outcomes. Readmission at 1 y was estimated with Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis. RESULTS: Patients (n = 109,744) who underwent AVR (90,574 B-AVR and 19,170 M-AVR) were included. B-AVR patients were older (median 68 versus 57 y; P < 0.001) and had more comorbidities (mean Elixhauser score: 11.8 versus 10.7; P < 0.001) compared to M-AVR patients. After matching (n = 36,951), there was no difference in age (58 versus 57 y; P = 0.6) and Elixhauser score (11.0 versus 10.8; P = 0.3). B-AVR patients had similar in-hospital mortality (2.3% versus 2.3%; P = 0.9) and cost (mean: $50,958 versus $51,200; P = 0.4) compared with M-AVR patients. However, B-AVR patients had shorter length of stay (8.3 versus 8.7 d; P < 0.001) and fewer readmissions at 30 d (10.3% versus 12.6%; P < 0.001) and 90 d (14.8% versus 17.8%; P < 0.001), and 1 y (P < 0.001, KM analysis). Patients undergoing B-AVR were less likely to be readmitted for bleeding or coagulopathy (5.7% versus 9.9%; P < 0.001) and effusions (9.1% versus 11.9%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: B-AVR patients had similar early outcomes compared to M-AVR patients, but lower rates of readmission. Bleeding, coagulopathy, and effusions are drivers of excess readmissions in M-AVR patients. Readmission reduction strategies targeting bleeding and improved anticoagulation management are warranted in the first year following AVR.

Impact of time off anticoagulation in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) receive anticoagulation to decrease the risk of thrombosis. Various circumstances require discontinuing anticoagulation in LVAD patients, but the risks entailed are not well defined. In a retrospective review of LVAD implantation procedures, we examined the effect of time off anticoagulation on thrombosis and mortality rates after implantation. An international normalized ratio ≤ 1.5 was used to screen for patients taken off anticoagulation. Patients were divided into three groups by the cumulative number of days off anticoagulation: no discontinuation, short-term discontinuation (< 30 days), and long-term discontinuation (≥ 30 days). Rates of ischemic stroke, pump thrombosis, and mortality were compared among groups. Of 245 patients who underwent LVAD implantation during the study, 70 (28.6%) were off anticoagulation during follow-up: 37 (15.1%) had short-term discontinuation (median, 11 days), and 33 (13.5%) had long-term discontinuation (median, 124 days). Patients with long-term discontinuation had a higher rate of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio 8.5, p = 0.001) and death (adjusted hazard ratio 3.9, p = 0.001). The three groups did not differ in pump thrombosis rate. We conclude that after LVAD implantation, discontinuing anticoagulation for ≥ 30 days is independently associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke and death.

Left Ventricular Unloading During Extracorporeal Life Support: Current Practice.

Venoarterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) is a powerful tool that can provide complete cardiopulmonary support for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. However, VA-ECLS increases left ventricular (LV) afterload, resulting in greater myocardial oxygen demand, which can impair myocardial recovery and worsen pulmonary edema. These complications can be ameliorated by various LV venting strategies to unload the LV. Evidence suggests that LV venting improves outcomes in VA-ECLS, but there is a paucity of randomized trials to help guide optimal strategy and the timing of venting. In this review, we discuss the available evidence regarding LV venting in VA-ECLS, explain important hemodynamic principles involved, and propose a practical approach to LV venting in VA-ECLS.

Outcomes of Heart Transplant Recipients with Class II Obesity: A United Network for Organ Sharing Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the 2016 ISHLT listing criteria guidelines for heart transplantation, recipients were recommended to have a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m². However, outcomes data for subgroups of transplant recipients with a BMI >35 kg/m² are limited. We examined the outcomes of heart transplant recipients who had a BMI of 35 to 39.9 kg/m² or ≥40 kg/m² and compared their outcomes with recipients who had a BMI <35 kg/m2. METHODS: Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 23,009 adults who underwent cardiac transplantation between 2009 and 2018. Transplant recipients were stratified by BMI categories (<35 kg/m², 35-39.9 kg/m², and ≥40 kg/m²). Patient survival was depicted by Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional-hazards modeling was used to determine the prognostic factors associated with mortality within 90 days, 1 year, and 5 years after transplantation. RESULTS: Survival at 90 days, 1 year, and 5 years after transplantation was better in recipients who had a BMI <35 kg/m² than in those who had a BMI of 35 to 39.9 kg/m² (P values ranged from 0.01 to < 0.001) or ≥40 kg/m² (P < 0.001). Additionally, survival at 90 days (P < 0.001) and 1 year (P = 0.002) was significantly better in recipients who had a BMI of 35 to 39.9 kg/m² than in those who had a BMI ≥40 kg/m². In multivariate analysis, a BMI of 35 to 39.9 was significantly associated with increased 90-day mortality (HR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.12, 2.08; P = 0.01) but not increased 1-year (HR = 1.28; 95% CI 0.99, 1.66; P = 0.06) or 5-year mortality (HR = 1.11; 95% CI 0.91, 1.36; P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: Although heart transplant recipients with class II obesity (BMI 35-39.9 kg/m²) may have suboptimal survival compared with those who have a BMI <35 kg/m², these patients have better outcomes than do those with class III obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m²). Thus, contrary to current guidelines, selected patients with class II obesity should be considered for transplantation.

Preoperative hyponatremia and survival after left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Hyponatremia is associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure and after cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that hyponatremia is associated with poorer short-term and longer term survival in patients after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) placement. METHODS: We reviewed a single-center database of patients who received a CF-LVAD during 2012-2017. Sodium (Na) values obtained within 14 days before CF-LVAD insertion were averaged; patients (n = 332) were divided into hyponatremia (mean Na <135 mEq/L; n = 160; 48.2%) and normonatremia groups (mean Na 135-145 mEq/L; n = 172; 51.8%). Patients requiring preoperative dialysis or pump exchange were excluded. We compared outcomes between preoperative hyponatremia and normonatremia groups. RESULTS: The two groups' baseline characteristics were similar, although hyponatremia patients more often had preoperative mechanical circulatory support (44.4% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.002). Although hyponatremic and normonatremic patients did not differ in 30-day mortality (7.5% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.7), preoperative hyponatremia was associated with greater 5-year mortality (61% vs. 44%, p = 0.03). On binary logistic regression analysis, the strongest independent predictors of late mortality were hyponatremia (odds ratio [OR] 1.88, 95% CI [1.07-3.31], p = 0.02), older age (OR 1.03, 95% CI [1.01-1.05], p = 0.01), and elevated mean right atrial pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio (OR 4.69, 95% CI [1.76-12.47], p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Hyponatremia was not associated with greater early mortality but was associated with poorer late survival. The optimal timing of LVAD implantation in relation to hyponatremia, and whether correcting hyponatremia perioperatively improves long-term survival, should be investigated.

Sequential organ failure assessment score improves survival prediction for left ventricular assist device recipients in intensive care.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative risk scores facilitate patient selection, but postoperative risk scores may offer valuable information for predicting outcomes. We hypothesized that the postoperative Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score would predict mortality after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 294 continuous-flow LVAD implantations performed at Mayo Clinic Rochester during 2007 to 2015. We calculated the EuroSCORE, HeartMate-II Risk Score, and RV Failure Risk Score from preoperative data and the APACHE III and Post Cardiac Surgery (POCAS) risk scores from postoperative data. Daily, maximum, and mean SOFA scores were calculated for the first 5 postoperative days. The area under receiver-operator characteristic curves (AUC) was calculated to compare the scoring systems' ability to predict 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, mortality was 5% at 30 days, 10% at 90 days, and 19% at 1 year. The Day 1 SOFA score had better discrimination for 30-day mortality (AUC 0.77) than the preoperative risk scores or the APACHE III and POCAS postoperative scores. The maximum SOFA score had the best discrimination for 30-day mortality (AUC 0.86), and the mean SOFA score had the best discrimination for 90-day mortality (AUC 0.82) and 1-year mortality (AUC 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that postoperative mean and maximum SOFA scores in LVAD recipients predict short-term and intermediate-term mortality better than preoperative risk scores do. However, because preoperative and postoperative risk scores each contribute unique information, they are best used in concert to predict outcomes after LVAD implantation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to durable left ventricular assist device implantation in INTERMACS-1 patients.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used as destination therapy or as a bridge to future cardiac transplant in patients with end-stage heart failure. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be used to bridge patients in cardiogenic shock or with decompensated heart failure to durable mechanical circulatory support. We assessed outcomes in patients in critical cardiogenic shock (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support [INTERMACS] profile 1) who underwent implantation of a continuous-flow (CF)-LVAD, with or without preoperative ECMO bridging. For this retrospective study, we selected INTERMACS profile 1 patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation at our institution between Sep 1, 2004 and Nov 30, 2018. Of 768 patients identified, 133 (17.3%) were INTERMACS profile 1; 26 (19.5%) received preoperative ECMO support, and 107 (80.5%) did not. Postimplantation outcomes were compared between the ECMO and no-ECMO groups. No significant differences were found in 30-day mortality (15.4 vs. 15.9%, P = 0.95) or survival at 1 year (53.8 vs. 60.9%, P = 0.51). Three patients who received ECMO before CF-LVAD implantation subsequently underwent cardiac transplant. In the ECMO group, the lactate level 1 day after ECMO initiation was lower in survivors than nonsurvivors (2.7 ± 2.2 vs. 7.4 ± 4.2 mmol/L, P = 0.02; area under the curve = 0.85, P = 0.01) after CF-LVAD implantation. Bridging with ECMO to CF-LVAD implantation in carefully selected INTERMACS profile 1 patients (those who are at the highest risk for critical cardiogenic shock and for whom palliation may be the only other option) produced acceptable postoperative outcomes.Field of research: Artificial lung/ECMO.

Expert Consensus of Data Elements for Collection for Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite the emergence of Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs) in cardiac surgery, there is no consensus on the essential elements for data reporting for quality improvement efforts, as well as accountability and standardization of outcome reporting across institutions. The aim of this study was to establish a consensus on essential data elements for cardiac ERAS®. METHODS: A 2-round modified Delphi technique was utilized based on existing recommendations from the recently published ERAS® cardiac surgery consensus guidelines. Round 1 included a steering committee of 10 experts who oversaw formulation of a focused list of data elements into 3 main areas: Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative. Round 2 consisted of a multidisciplinary, multinational, heterogenous group of 50 voting experts from across the United States and Europe. All participants evaluated their level of agreement with each data element using a 5-point Likert scale with consensus threshold of 70%. RESULTS: In round 1, 17 data elements were considered essential (consensus > = 70%, either positive or negative) and 6 were considered marginal (consensus < = 70%, either positive or negative). In round 2, positive consensus was achieved for 15/17 (88.2%) data elements in the essential category, and all six data elements (100%) in the marginal category, indicating a high level of overall agreement. CONCLUSION: This initial study, which identified 21 key data elements for collection in an ERAS® cardiac program, will aid clinicians in establishing a framework for evaluating the quality of their contemporary ERP processes and will allow acquisition of data to help benchmark performance metrics between hospitals.

Treatment With Angiotensin II Is Associated With Rapid Blood Pressure Response and Vasopressor Sparing in Patients With Vasoplegia After Cardiac Surgery: A Post-Hoc Analysis of Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock (ATHOS-3) Study.

OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated outcomes in patients with vasoplegia after cardiac surgery treated with angiotensin II plus standard-of-care vasopressors. Vasoplegia is a common complication in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Approximately 250,000 cardiac surgeries with cardiopulmonary bypass are performed in the United States annually, with vasoplegia occurring in 20%to-27% of patients. DESIGN: Post-hoc analysis of the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock (ATHOS-3) study. SETTING: Multicenter, multinational study. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen patients with vasoplegia after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Angiotensin II plus standard-of-care vasopressors (n = 9) compared with placebo plus standard-of-care vasopressors (n = 7). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was mean arterial pressure response (mean arterial pressure ≥75 mmHg or an increase from baseline of ≥10 mmHg at hour 3 without an increase in the dose of standard-of-care vasopressors). Vasopressor sparing and safety also were assessed. Mean arterial pressure response was achieved in 8 (88.9%) patients in the angiotensin II group compared with 0 (0%) patients in the placebo group (p = 0.0021). At hour 12, the median standard-of-care vasopressor dose had decreased from baseline by 76.5% in the angiotensin II group compared with an increase of 7.8% in the placebo group (p = 0.0013). No venous or arterial thrombotic events were reported. CONCLUSION: Patients with vasoplegia after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass rapidly responded to angiotensin II, permitting significant vasopressor sparing.

Predictors of renal replacement therapy in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) after continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation significantly affects patients' quality of life and survival. To identify preoperative prognostic markers in patients requiring RRT after CF-LVAD implantation, we retrospectively reviewed data from patients who underwent implantation of a CF-LVAD at our institution during 2012-2017. Patients who required preoperative RRT were excluded. Preoperative and operative characteristics, as well as survival and adverse events, were compared between 74 (22.2%) patients requiring any duration of postoperative RRT and 259 (77.8%) not requiring RRT. Patients requiring RRT experienced more postoperative complications than patients who did not, including respiratory failure necessitating tracheostomy (35.7% vs 2.5%, p < 0.001), reoperation for bleeding (34.3% vs 11.7%, p < 0.001), and right heart failure necessitating perioperative mechanical circulatory support (32.4% vs 6.9%, p < 0.001). Patients requiring postoperative RRT also had poorer survival at 30 days (74.7% vs 98.8%), 6 months (48.2% vs 95.1%), and 12 months (45.3% vs 90.2%) (p < 0.001). Significant predictors of RRT after CF-LVAD implantation included urine proteinuria (odds ratio [OR] 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.7-7.6], p = 0.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR 3.4, 95% CI [1.5-17.8], p = 0.004), and mean right atrial pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio ≥ 0.54 (OR 2.6, 95% CI [1.3-5.], p = 0.01). Of the 74 RRT patients, 11 (14.9%) recovered renal function before discharge, 36 (48.6%) still required RRT after discharge, and 27 (36.5%) died before discharge. We conclude that preoperative renal and right ventricular dysfunction significantly predict postoperative renal failure and mortality after CF-LVAD implantation.

Cardiac surgery during the COVID-19 sine wave: Preparation once, preparation twice. A view from Houston.

The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has created major challenges and disruptions to hospitals throughout the world, with profound implications for cardiac surgery and cardiac surgeons. In this review, we highlight the hospital and cardiac surgical experience at Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center in the Texas Medical Center in Houston, Texas as of mid-July 2020. Our local experience has consisted of a spring surge (early March to early May), followed by a relative flattening and then a summer surge (early June to present day), similar to a sine wave. Throughout the entire pandemic, our simultaneous medical priorities have been treating the growing number of patients with COVID-19 while continuing to provide needed care for those without COVID-19. The current situation will be the "new normal" until a vaccine becomes available. It will be vital to stay attuned to epidemiologists, public health officials, and infection control experts, because what they see today, the intensive care units will see tomorrow. The lessons we have learned are outlined in this review but can be summarized most succinctly: preparation. We must prepare in advance, stockpile supplies and personal protective equipment, have rapid and vigorous testing protocols in place, utilize technology (eg, online meetings, videoconference "office visits"), and encourage hospital-wide and community protective efforts (social distancing, mask wearing, hand hygiene). Hopefully, the lessons learned through this challenging experience will prepare us for the next time.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery: clinical practice review.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery is associated with elevated morbidity and mortality. Although current prediction models have limited efficacy, several perioperative interventions can reduce patients' risk of POAF. These begin with preoperative medications, including beta-blockers and amiodarone. Moreover, patients should be screened for preexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) so that concomitant surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion can be performed in appropriate candidates. Intraoperative interventions such as posterior pericardiectomy can reduce mediastinal fluid accumulation, which is a trigger for POAF. Furthermore, many preventive strategies for POAF are implemented in the immediate postoperative period. Initiating beta-blockers, amiodarone, or both is reasonable for most patients. Overdrive atrial pacing, colchicine, and steroids have been used by some, although the evidence base is less robust. For patients with POAF, rate-control and rhythm-control strategies have comparable outcomes. Decision-making regarding anticoagulation should recognize that the stroke risk associated with POAF appears to be lower than that for general nonvalvular AF. The evidence that oral anticoagulation reduces stroke risk is less clear for POAF patients than for patients with general nonvalvular AF. Given that POAF tends to be shorter-lived and is associated with greater bleeding risks in the perioperative period, decisions regarding anticoagulation should be individualized. Finally, wearable technology and machine learning algorithms for better predicting and managing POAF appear to be coming soon. These technologies and a comprehensive clinical program could meaningfully reduce the incidence of this common complication.

2022: Perioperative and critical care year in review for the cardiothoracic surgery team.

This year, we have again assembled an expert opinion on several key topics that pertain to the perioperative and critical care management of the cardiac surgery patient and for patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Approximately 1 in 3 patients undergoing cardiac surgery have diabetes mellitus; contemporary glycemic control management of these patients to minimize perioperative complications are reviewed. Goal directed fluid therapy remains an area on interest and controversy; the use of albumin as a resuscitation fluid and recent clinical trial data is reviewed. Delirium is characterized as an acute confusional state occurring in 20-25% of patients after cardiac surgery. Insights on integrating the whole interdisciplinary team, including the family, with the DELirium Team Approach (DELTA) program are discussed. Optimal management for refractory hypoxemia with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) and the role of prone positioning remain a question. Data supporting this technique during VV-ECMO is reviewed-lastly, the contemporary management and supporting evidence for refractory postoperative vasoplegic shock after cardiopulmonary bypass is provided.

Outcomes after bioprosthetic versus mechanical mitral valve replacement for infective endocarditis in the United States.

Objective: In patients who underwent mitral valve replacement for infectious endocarditis, we evaluated the association of prosthesis choice with readmission rates and causes (the primary outcomes), as well as with in-hospital mortality, cost, and length of stay (the secondary outcomes). Methods: Patients with infectious endocarditis who underwent isolated mitral valve replacement from January 2016 to December 2018 were identified in the United States Nationwide Readmissions Database and stratified by valve type. Propensity score matching was used to compare adjusted outcomes. Results: A weighted total of 4206 patients with infectious endocarditis underwent bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (n = 3132) and mechanical mitral valve replacement (n = 1074) during the study period. Patients in the bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement group were older than those in the mechanical mitral valve replacement group (median 57 vs 46 y, P < .001). After propensity matching, the bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement group (n = 1068) had similar in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs compared with the mechanical mitral valve replacement group (n = 1056). Overall, 90-day readmission rates were high (28.9%) and comparable for bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (30.5%) and mechanical mitral valve replacement (27.5%, P = .4). Likewise, there was no difference in readmissions over a calendar year by prosthesis type. Readmissions for infection and bleeding were common for both bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement and mechanical mitral valve replacement groups. Conclusions: Outcomes and readmission rates were similar for mechanical mitral valve replacement and bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in infectious endocarditis, suggesting that valve choice should not be determined by endocarditis status. Additionally, strategies to mitigate readmission for infection and bleeding are needed for both groups.

Outcomes of minimally invasive isolated tricuspid valve repair and replacement through right mini-thoracotomy.

Objective: Isolated tricuspid valve surgery is uncommon and associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality. We aimed to study the overall outcomes of patients who underwent minimally invasive right thoracotomy tricuspid valve surgery (Mini-TVS), consisting of either tricuspid valve repair (TVre) or replacement (TVR). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all Mini-TVS procedures (2017-2022), through which we identified isolated tricuspid valve surgeries. We examined in-hospital outcomes, survival analysis over a 4-year period, and competing risk analysis for reoperative surgery. Results: Among a total of 51 patients, the average age was 60 ± 16 years, and 67% (n = 34) were female. Severe tricuspid regurgitation was present in all cases. Infective endocarditis was noted in 7.8% (n = 4), and 24% (n = 12) had preexisting pacemakers. Mini-TVS included TVre in 18 patients (35%) and TVR in 33 patients (65%). The in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 4% (n = 2) and 6% (n = 3), respectively. At 4 years, the overall TVS survival was 76% (confidence interval, 62-93%), with no significant difference between TVre and TVR (91% vs 69%, P = .16). At follow-up, 3 patients required repeat surgery for recurrent regurgitation after 2.6, 3.3, and 11 months, with a reoperation rate of 7.3% (confidence interval, 2.4-22%) at 2 years. Factors associated with worse overall survival included nonelective surgery, right ventricular dysfunction, serum creatinine >2 g/dL, and concomitant left-sided valve disease. Conclusions: A nonsternotomy minimally invasive approach is a feasible option for high-risk patients. Midterm outcomes were similar in repair or replacement. Patients with right ventricular dysfunction and left-sided disease had worse outcomes.

Unplanned readmissions, community socioeconomic factors, and their effects on long-term survival after complex thoracic aortic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated community socioeconomic factors in patients who had unplanned readmission after undergoing proximal aortic surgery (ascending aorta, aortic root, or arch). METHODS: Unplanned readmissions for any reason within 60 days of the index procedure were reviewed by race, acuity at presentation, and gender. We also evaluated 3 community socioeconomic factors: poverty, household income, and education. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess long-term survival differences by group (race, acuity, and gender). RESULTS: Among 2339 patients who underwent proximal aortic surgery during the 20-year study period and were discharged alive, our team identified 146 (6.2%) unplanned readmissions. Compared with White patients, Black patients lived in areas characterized by more widespread poverty (20.8% vs 11.1%; P = .0003), lower income ($42,776 vs $65,193; P = .0007), and fewer residents with a high school diploma (73.7% vs 90.1%; P < .0001). Compared with patients whose index operation was elective, patients who had urgent or emergency index procedures lived in areas with lower income ($54,425 vs $64,846; P = .01) and fewer residents with a high school diploma (81.1% vs 89.2%; P = .005). Community socioeconomic factors did not differ by gender. Four- and 6-year survival estimates were 63.1% and 63.1% for Black patients versus 89.1% and 83.0% for White patients (P = .0009). No significant differences by acuity or gender were found. CONCLUSIONS: Among readmitted patients, Black patients and patients who had emergency surgery had less favorable community socioeconomic factors and poorer long-term survival. Earlier and more frequent follow-up in these patients should be considered. Developing off-campus clinics and specific postdischarge measures targeting these patients is important.