Indirect Treatment Comparisons of Lenacapavir Plus Optimized Background Regimen Versus Other Treatments for Multidrug-Resistant Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PWH) may not achieve virologic suppression (VS) with combination antiretroviral therapy due to multidrug resistance (MDR), intolerance, and safety concerns. These PWH often receive highly individualized treatment regimens, but these regimens may not enable PWH to achieve VS, thereby halting disease progression. Novel medications are required for treating individuals with MDR HIV. Lenacapavir (LEN), a first-in-class HIV capsid inhibitor, is under investigation for the treatment of HTE individuals with MDR HIV in the phase 2/3 CAPELLA study. This study aimed to compare LEN plus optimized background regimen (OBR) with fostemsavir (FTR) + OBR, ibalizumab (IBA) + OBR, and OBR alone in terms of VS, CD4 cell count change from baseline, immunologic recovery, and discontinuation due to adverse events, using indirect treatment comparisons. METHODS: A systematic review identified clinical evidence on HIV-1 treatments in HTE PWH. A feasibility assessment evaluated the identified studies for indirect treatment comparison analyses based on population characteristics, interventions, comparators, and outcomes of interest. Unanchored simulated treatment comparisons of LEN + OBR versus comparators were conducted. RESULTS: LEN + OBR had 6.57 times higher odds of VS at weeks 24 to 28 than FTR + OBR (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-32.28), 8.93 times higher odds of VS than IBA + OBR (95% CI 2.07-38.46), and 12.74 times higher odds of VS than OBR alone (95% CI 1.70-95.37). Change from baseline in CD4 cell count was similar across LEN + OBR, FTR + OBR, and IBA + OBR. CONCLUSION: LEN + OBR has statistically significantly greater odds of VS at weeks 24 to 28 than its comparators and represents a novel treatment for people with MDR HIV.

Improving the clinical accuracy and flexibility of the Alkaptonuria severity score index.

Alkaptonuria (AKU) is a rare genetic disorder where oxidised homogentisic acid accumulates in connective tissues, leading to multisystem disease. The clinical evaluation Alkaptonuria Severity Score Index (cAKUSSI) is a composite score that assesses the extent of AKU disease. However, some components assess similar disease features, are difficult to measure reliably or cannot be measured in resource-limited environments. cAKUSSI data from the 4-year SONIA 2 randomised controlled trial, which investigated nitisinone treatment in adults with AKU, were analysed (N = 125). Potentially biased or low-information cAKUSSI measurements were identified using clinical and statistical input to create a revised AKUSSI for use in AKU research (cAKUSSI 2.0). Additionally, resource-intensive measurements were removed to explore a flexible AKUSSI (flex-AKUSSI) for use in low-resource environments. Revised scores were compared to cAKUSSI in terms of correlation and how they capture disease progression and treatment response. Eight measurements were removed from the cAKUSSI to create the cAKUSSI 2.0, which performed comparably to the cAKUSSI in measuring disease extent, progression and treatment response. When removing resource-intensive measurements except for osteoarticular disease, the flex-AKUSSI was highly correlated with the cAKUSSI, indicating that they quantified disease extent similarly. However, when osteoarticular disease (measured using scans) was removed, the corresponding flex-AKUSSI underestimated disease progression and overestimated treatment response compared to the cAKUSSI. Clinicians may use the cAKUSSI 2.0 to reduce time, effort and patient burden. Clinicians in resource-limited environments may find value in computing a flex-AKUSSI score, offering potential for future global registries to expand knowledge about AKU.