RESUMO
Surfactant replacement for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is currently guided by oxygen (FiO2) requirement in preterm neonates. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as an important predictive tool; however, there is a paucity of evidence from developing countries. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the LUS score in comparison to standard criteria based on FiO2 requirement for prediction of surfactant requirement. In this prospective study, preterm neonates of < 34 weeks' gestation with RDS were included within 2 h of life. Surfactant was administered if the FiO2 requirement exceeded 30%. Baseline characteristics, respiratory parameters, and LUS clips were recorded soon after birth and compared between the surfactant and non-surfactant groups. LUS scoring was later performed by masked assessors which was not used in the management of neonates. Among 82 neonates (mean gestation 30.6 weeks and weight 1375 g) included in the study, 33 (40.2%) received surfactant. The surfactant group had a higher Silverman score, required higher FiO2 and mean airway pressure, and needed invasive ventilation more frequently. The mean (± SD) LUS score was significantly higher in the surfactant (9.4 ± 3.2) compared to the non-surfactant group (5.1 ± 2.1). The diagnostic accuracy of LUS scoring was determined by ROC curve analysis (AUC (95% CI): 0.83 (0.74-0.92), p < 0.01). A cutoff score of ≥ 8 for LUS was considered optimal for the prediction of surfactant requirement (sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of 70% (51-84) and 80% (66-90), respectively). Conclusion: Lung ultrasound is a valid diagnostic tool for the prediction of surfactant requirements in resource-limited settings. What is Known: ⢠Lung ultrasound has a good diagnostic accuracy in predicting the need for surfactant administration in preterm neonates in developed countries, but its role in developing countries is unclear. What is New: ⢠Lung ultrasound proved to be a valid diagnostic tool in predicting surfactant replacement therapy in resource-limited settings. ⢠The diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound was better in neonates on non-invasive ventilation, compared to invasive ventilation.
Assuntos
Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Pulmão , Surfactantes Pulmonares , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido , Ultrassonografia , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Surfactantes Pulmonares/administração & dosagem , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido/terapia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório do Recém-Nascido/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Índia , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Curva ROC , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Sepsis is a common cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Though antibiotics are the mainstay of treatment in culture-positive neonatal sepsis, the dilemma persists for the optimum duration of antimicrobial therapy. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of short-course antibiotics for uncomplicated culture-positive neonatal sepsis. This systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42023444899) identified, appraised, and synthesised the available evidence from randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials related to the efficacy of short-course (7-10 days) versus standard-course (14 days) antibiotics for uncomplicated culture-positive neonatal sepsis on the rate of treatment failure, mortality, duration of hospitalisation, morbidities including antibiotics-related adverse events, long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes and cost analysis. Data were pooled using RevMan 5.4 software. Certainty of evidence (COE) for predefined outcomes was analysed by GRADE. Available evidence showed no significant difference in the rate of treatment failure between 7- to 10-day versus 14-day antibiotics courses [risk ratio (95% confidence interval, CI), 2.45 (0.93-6.47), I2 = 0%, six studies, n = 573, very low COE]. No incidence of death was reported in either treatment arm in the two included studies. Duration of hospitalisation was significantly shorter with the short-course antibiotics arm compared to standard-course [mean difference (95% CI), -3.88 (-4.22 to -3.54) days, I2 = 0%, five studies, n = 507, low COE]. Morbidities reported in the three studies were similar. Other outcomes were not reported. To conclude the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of short-course antibiotic regimen, compared to a standard-course, on the treatment failure rate in uncomplicated culture-positive neonatal sepsis. Adequately powered trials with outcomes including death and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment are needed.
RESUMO
Neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) are at increased risk of altered cardiopulmonary transition at birth. There is a paucity of literature evaluating the transitional hemodynamics in these neonates. We aimed to evaluate transitional hemodynamics via echocardiography in neonates born through MSAF, compared to healthy neonates. The primary objective was to assess pulmonary vascular resistance using left pulmonary artery-velocity time integral (LPA-VTI). The secondary objectives were to assess other pulmonary vascular parameters and myocardial function. We enrolled 35 MSAF-born and 35 healthy neonates. Echocardiography was performed at 24 and 48 h of life by a pediatric cardiologist. Echocardiographic parameters were compared between MSAF-born and healthy neonates, and between MSAF-born neonates who developed meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) and who did not (non-MAS). Among 35 MSAF-born neonates, 14 (40%) were non-vigorous, 18 (51%) required admission to neonatal intensive care unit, 8 (23%) developed MAS, 3 (9%) pulmonary hypertension and 1 (3%) air leak. On echocardiography, LPA-VTI (cm; mean ± SD) was significantly decreased at 24 and 48 h in MSAF-born neonates (14.38 ± 2.48; 15.55 ± 2.48), compared to healthy neonates (16.60 ± 2.14; 17.66 ± 2.71), respectively. Further, LPA-VTI was significantly reduced at 24 and 48 h among MAS (11.81 ± 3.0; 12.43 ± 2.5), compared to non-MAS neonates (15.15 ± 1.72; 16.48 ± 1.55), respectively. Other pulmonary vascular and myocardial function parameters were comparable between the two groups. Pulmonary adaptation was significantly delayed in neonates with MSAF, which was more pronounced in MAS neonates. Further studies should explore the utility of these parameters for early prediction of cardiorespiratory morbidities in this population.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a short course of antibiotics (2-4 days), to a standard course (5-7 days), for the treatment of culture-negative neonatal sepsis. METHODS: Relevant databases were searched for RCTs comparing short- vs. standard-course of antibiotics for culture-negative sepsis. The primary outcomes were mortality and treatment failure, defined as the reappearance of clinical signs suggestive of sepsis within 7 days of stoppage of antibiotics. Secondary outcomes included neurological impairment, duration of hospital stay, need for oxygen, respiratory support and double-volume exchange transfusion (DVET). RESULTS: Seven RCTs were included in the review with 729 neonates >30 weeks gestational age at birth. No mortality occurred in either of the groups (2 studies; 276 neonates). Treatment failure rates were similar in the short- and standard-course antibiotic groups [7 studies; 729 neonates; risk ratio (RR) = 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55 to 1.86; very low certainty]. The short course of antibiotics resulted in a shorter hospital stay [3 studies; 293 neonates; mean difference (MD), -2.46 days; 95% CI, -3.16 to -1.75]. There was no difference in the need for oxygen supplementation (2 studies; 258 neonates; RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.40 to 4.91), any respiratory support (2 studies; 258 neonates; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.17) or DVET (2 studies; 258 neonates; RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.56 to 2.95). CONCLUSION: Very-low certainty evidence suggests that a short antibiotic course, compared to a standard course, does not affect treatment failure rates in culture-negative neonatal sepsis. There is a need for well-designed RCTs powered enough to assess critical outcomes such as mortality and neurological sequelae to generate stronger evidence and inform guidelines. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023437199.
Prolonged antibiotic usage has been associated with increased mortality and morbidity in neonates. The standard practice in culture-negative neonatal sepsis has been to administer antibiotics for 57 days, based on expert consensus. In this systematic review, a short course of antibiotics (24 days), in comparison to a standard course (57 days), did not affect the treatment failure rates in culture-negative neonatal sepsis. However, the certainty of evidence was too low to make robust conclusions. There is a need for well-designed large trials to generate stronger evidence and inform guidelines.
Assuntos
Sepse Neonatal , Sepse , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Sepse Neonatal/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Tempo de InternaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The application of splints is one of the most used methods to prolong the life span of peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC). OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of splint application on the functional duration of PIVC in neonates. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified, appraised, and synthesized available evidence from randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCT) related to the effects of splint application compared to no splinting on the functional duration of PIVC and its associated complications in term and preterm neonates. Data were pooled using RevMan 5.4. The quality of evidence for predefined outcomes was analyzed by GRADE. RESULTS: Available evidence (5 RCTs, 826 neonates) showed a significantly lesser functional duration of PIVC in the splint group compared to no-splint [Mean Difference (MD) 95% Confidence Interval (CI) -3.07 (-5.63, -0.51); Low Certainty of Evidence (CoE)]. On gestation-based subgroup analysis, PIVC duration remained significantly lesser in the splint group in preterm neonates [MD (95% CI), -5.09 (-9.53, -0.65), 2 studies, n = 220; Low CoE], whereas it was comparable in the term neonates [MD (95% CI), 3.92 (-4.27, 12.10), 2 studies, n = 89; Very low CoE]. The overall complications were comparable between the groups [Risk Ratio (95% CI), 1.02 (1.00, 1.05), 5 studies, n = 826; Very low CoE]. CONCLUSION: Based on the very low to low CoE found in this systematic review, it is not possible to recommend or refute splint application in neonates. Further well-designed RCTs are needed.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Contenções , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Recém-Nascido PrematuroRESUMO
Epilepsy is not a common cause of morbidity in pregnancy. It has widespread effects on maternal and fetal health necessitating adequate control of seizures. Many anti-seizure medications (ASM) have teratogenic effects on the fetus. We report a case of severe fetal hydantoin syndrome resulting in life-threatening major congenital anomalies. The mother was on phenytoin for the last three years and the pregnancy was not registered. We discuss various features of fetal hydantoin syndrome and the ideal management of epilepsy in pregnancy in brief.