Risk of Nephrolithiasis in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Biologic Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. Biologic drugs target specific molecules in the body's immune system to control inflammation. Recent studies have suggested a potential link between their use and an increased risk of nephrolithiasis. We conducted a study to further investigate this association. METHODS: The study used multiple logistic regression analysis to assess the association between the use of biologic drugs and nephrolithiasis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. SAS 9.4 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 22,895 cases, among which 5603 (24.51%) were receiving at least one biologic drug. The biologic drugs received were as follows: Adalimumab 2437 (10.66%), Infliximab 1996 (8.73%), Vedolizumab 1397 (6.11%), Ustekinumab 1304 (5.70%); Tofacitinib, 308 (1.35%); Certolizumab, 248 (1.08%); and Golimumab, 121 (0.53%). There were 1780 (7.74%) patients with Nephrolithiasis: 438 (8.0%) patients were receiving biologic treatment. We found that the use of Vedolizumab (OR = 1.307, 95% CI 1.076-1.588, p = 0.0071) increased the odds of Nephrolithiasis by 31%. CONCLUSION: Vedolizumab use was associated with an increased risk of nephrolithiasis. The use of two or more biologic drugs also increased the risk compared to no biologic treatment.

Positive predictive value of fecal immunochemical test for high-risk colonic adenomas and carcinoma: A health maintenance organization cohort screening study in Lebanon.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) is one of the leading modalities for colorectal cancer screening. Studies show that FIT is highly sensitive for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) but not similarly accurate for detection of pre-cancerous advanced adenomas (AA). We studied the performance metrics of FIT for the detection of CRC and AA in ahealth maintenance organization (HMO) cohort screening program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of asymptomatic persons of screening age belonging to a HMO. Endoscopy and pathology reports of those who tested positive were used to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) of FIT, and characterize endoscopic findings on colonoscopy. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2017, 3000 persons had screening fecal occult testing as part of their Employee Health Care plan. Of those, 150 had a positive qualitative FIT (cutoff 10 Âµg hemoglobin/g feces). All underwentcolonoscopy, and median time to colonoscopy was 27 days. 4 (2.6%) had carcinoma(2 stage IIIA and 2 stage IIIB), 106 (70.6%) had adenomas of which 40 (26.6% of the total cohort) had advanced adenomas (≥1 cm, villous features, or high-grade dysplasia) giving a PPV for AA and carcinoma of 29% and 3% respectively. When stratified by age, the PPV of AA; carcinoma was [50-59 (21.7%; 0.0%)], [60-69 (14.6%; 4.2%)], [70-79 (42.6%; 2.1%)], [80-89 (33.3%; 11.1%)]. CONCLUSION: The performance characteristics of FIT testing are acceptable for population screening in resource-limited settings. The resultsof this study are helpful when discussing expectations prior to colonoscopy in people with positive FIT.

The Natural History of Incidental Colonic Diverticulosis on Screening Colonoscopy.

Background: The natural history of colonic diverticulosis is unclear. Methods: Patients with incidental diverticulosis identified in a previous prospective cross-sectional screening colonoscopy study were evaluated retrospectively for clinic or hospital visit(s) for diverticular disease (DD= acute diverticulitis or diverticular bleeding) using review of electronic health records and patient phone interview. Results: 826 patients were included in the screening colonoscopy study. Three were excluded for prior DD. In all, 224 patients (27.2%; mean age 62.3 ± 8.2) had incidental diverticulosis distributed in the left colon (67.4%), right colon (5.8%), or both (22.8%). Up-to-date information was available on 194 patients. Of those, 144 (74.2%) could be reached for detailed interview and constituted the study population. Over a mean follow-up of 7.0 ± 1.7 years, DD developed in 6 out of 144 patients (4.2%) (4 acute cases of diverticulitis, 1 probable case of diverticular bleeding, and 1 acute case of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding). Two patients were hospitalized, and none required surgery. The time to event was 5.1 ± 1.6 years and the incidence rate was 5.9 per 1000 patient-years. On multivariate analysis, none of the variables collected at baseline colonoscopy including age, gender, obesity, exercise, fiber intake, alcohol use, constipation, or use of NSAIDs were associated with DD. Conclusion: The natural history of incidental diverticulosis on screening colonoscopy was highly favorable in this well-defined prospectively identified cohort. The common scenario of incidental diverticulosis at screening colonoscopy makes this information clinically relevant and valuable to physicians and patients alike.

A Customized Mobile Application in Colonoscopy Preparation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Adherence with diet and prescribed purgative is essential for proper cleansing with low-volume bowel preparations. The aim of this work was to assess the effect of a customized mobile application (App) on adherence and quality of bowel preparation. METHODS: One hundred and sixty (160) eligible patients scheduled for elective colonoscopy were randomly assigned to paper (control) or App-based instructions. The preparation consisted of low-fiber diet for 2 days, clear fluids for one day and split-dose sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPS). Before colonoscopy, information was collected regarding adherence with, and utility of the provided instructions. The colonoscopists, blinded to assignment, graded bowel preparation using the Aronchick, Ottawa, and Chicago preparation scales. The primary endpoint was adherence with instructions. Quality of preparation was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: No difference in overall adherence or bowel cleanliness was observed between the study arms. Adherence was reported in 82.4% of App vs. 73.4% of controls (P=0.40). An adequate bowel preparation on the Aronchick scale was noted in 77.2 vs. 82.5%, respectively (P=0.68). Mean scores on the Ottawa and Chicago scales were also similar. Gender, age, time of colonoscopy, and BMI did not influence preparation or adherence. Compliance with the clear fluid diet component was noted in 94% of patients with BMI<30 vs. 77% with BMI≥30 (P<0.01). SPS was well tolerated by 81.9% of patients. The App was user-friendly and received higher overall rating in this respect than paper instructions (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SPS is well tolerated and effective for bowel cleansing regardless of instruction method. Customized smartphone applications are effective, well-accepted and could replace standard paper instructions for bowel preparation.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02410720.