A procedure to detect and identify specific chemicals of potential inhalation toxicity concern in aerosols.

OBJECTIVE: Understanding the potential inhalation toxicity of poorly characterized aerosols is challenging both because aerosols may contain numerous chemicals and because it is difficult to predict which chemicals may present significant inhalation toxicity concerns at the observed levels. We have developed a novel systematic procedure to address these challenges through non-targeted chemical analysis by two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC-TOFMS) and assessment of the results using publicly available toxicity data to prioritize the tentatively identified detected chemicals according to potential inhalation toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedure involves non-targeted chemical analysis of aerosol samples utilizing GC × GC-TOFMS, which is selected because it is an effective technique for detecting chemicals in complex samples and assigning tentative identities according to the mass spectra. For data evaluation, existing toxicity data (e.g. from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CompTox Chemicals Dashboard) are used to calculate multiple toxicity metrics that can be compared among the tentatively identified chemicals. These metrics include hazard quotient, incremental lifetime cancer risk, and metrics analogous to hazard quotient that we designated as exposure-(toxicology endpoint) ratios. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We demonstrated the utility of our procedure by detecting, identifying, and prioritizing specific chemicals of potential inhalation toxicity concern in the mainstream smoke generated from the machine-smoking of marijuana blunts. CONCLUSION: By designing a systematic approach for detecting and identifying numerous chemicals in complex aerosol samples and prioritizing the chemicals in relation to different inhalation toxicology endpoints, we have developed an effective approach to elucidate the potential inhalation toxicity of aerosols.

Implant Site Development Using Titanium Mesh in the Maxilla: A Retrospective Study of 58 Mesh Procedures in 48 Patients.

This article presents a retrospective case series of implant site development using titanium mesh (Ti-mesh) in the maxilla. A total of 58 mesh procedures in combination with several different bone grafts (allograft, cellular allograft, and bovine xenograft) and biologics (including recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor, autogenous platelet-rich growth factor, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2) were performed in 48 patients. Ti-mesh guided bone regeneration procedures were performed 2 to 3 months after extraction of nonrestorable/hopeless teeth, and the implants were placed 6 to 8 months postaugmentation. The mean initial ridge width was 2.0 ± 1.0 mm, and the mean horizontal gain after Ti-mesh procedures was 4.7 ± 1.6 mm. The ridge width was first measured on the cross-sectional presurgical CBCT image and then confirmed clinically during surgical procedures. No statistical difference in the horizontal gain was found among different combinations of bone grafts and biomaterials. Ti-mesh exposure occurred 22% of the time. The middle-aged adults (odds ratio [OR] = 8.59; P = .046) and older adults (OR = 16.66; P = .02) had significantly higher chances of mesh exposure compared to young adults. While all implants were successfully placed, about 56% of the implants had < 2 mm of bone to the facial aspect of the osteotomy and received additional contour augmentation when placed in a prosthetically appropriate position for a screw-retained restoration. This study demonstrates that although Ti-mesh procedures result in significant bone regeneration in narrow alveolar ridges to predictably allow implant placement, the age-related mesh exposure rate and frequency of need for additional contour grafting should be discussed with patients.