Associations between palliative-care consultations and end-of-life quality in cancer patients' last 6 months.

PURPOSE: Improving end-of-life (EOL) quality for terminally ill cancer patients is crucial. However, associations between hospice/palliative care and EOL quality, as perceived by patients, are underreported. We aimed to examine the impact of palliative care consultative services on the EOL quality during cancer patients' last six months. METHODS: In this prospective, longitudinal study, 174 cancer patients were divided into a palliative care consultative services group (n = 65) or a non palliative care consultative services group (n = 109). The impact of palliative care consultative services on EOL quality, assessed using the Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) scale at the first and last assessments within the patients' last six months, was analyzed by linear regression with generalized estimating equations, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: Cancer patients received palliative care consultative services a median of 34.0 days before death. There were significant main effects of groups, indicating that patients receiving palliative care consultative services had better QODD total scores (ß [95% confidence interval] = 2.12 [0.32,3.93], p = .021), death preparation (3.80 [1.71,5.89], p < .001), and treatment preferences than the reference group (3.27 [0.90,5.64], p = .007). No group differences were found in other dimensions, including symptom and personal care, whole person concern, and time with family. CONCLUSION: Palliative care consultative services significantly improved cancer patients' perceptions of death preparation, treatment preferences, and the QODD total score. Therefore, healthcare professionals should offer palliative care consultative services to cancer patients, initiate early referrals for such care, and implement effective and individualized interventions to enhance EOL quality.

Lenvatinib combined with nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma-real-world experience.

Lenvatinib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptors pathway, activated the immune response in tumor microenvironment. However, the combination of lenvatinib and anti-PD-1 has been reported in early phase studies. Hence, this study aims to explore the efficacy and toxicity of lenvatinib combined with nivolumab in the real-world setting. Advanced HCC patients who underwent lenvatinib combined with nivolumab (L + N group) treatment at Taipei Veterans General Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan) were reviewed between January 2016 and December 2020. Treatment response and outcomes were collected and analyzed. A control group with lenvatinib (L group) was also included for comparison. Forty patients were included in L + N group and 47 in L group. The L + N group demonstrated a higher objective response rate than L group (45.0% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.03). The L + N group also achieved longer PFS (7.5 vs. 4.8 months, p = 0.05) and OS (22.9 vs. 10.3 months, p = 0.01) than L group. Patients with HBV infection and REFLECT criteria fit demonstrated a trend of better prognosis. The PFS for those with PR, SD and PD groups were 11.2, 6.4, and 2.2 months and OS were non-reached, 14.6 and 4.7 months, respectively. Portal vein thrombosis (HR 4.3, 95% C.I. 1.5-12.8) and AFP > 400 ng/mL (HR 3.3, 95% C.I. 1.1-9.3) were poor prognostic factors and nivolumab used remained a protective factor (HR 0.2, 95% C.I. 0.1-0.7). Dermatitis (35.0%), pruritis (27.5%), and hypothyroidism (27.5%) were the common toxicities. Few patients developed grade 3/4 toxicities, including dermatitis (15%), gastrointestinal bleeding (7.5%), hypertension (5.0%), pneumonitis (2.5%) and stomatitis (2.5%). This is the first real-world data reporting the promising efficacy and tolerable toxicities of lenvatinib combined with nivolumab in advanced HCC. Further randomized trials are prompted.

Anti-PD-1 combined sorafenib versus anti-PD-1 alone in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matching study.

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a role in the tumor microenvironment. Sorafenib, which inhibits the VEGF pathway, has an immune-modulation function but lacks substantial clinical data. This study aims to explore the efficacy of anti-PD-1 combined sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: HCC patients who underwent anti-PD-1 treatment at Taipei Veterans General Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan) between January 2016 and February 2019 were reviewed. The efficacy was compared between groups after propensity-score matching. RESULTS: There were 173 HCC patients receiving anti-PD-1. After excluding unsuitable cases, 140 patients were analyzed, of which 58 received combination therapy and 82 received anti-PD-1 alone. The combination therapy had a trend of higher CR rate (8.6% vs. 4.9%, ns.), ORR (22.4% vs. 19.5%, ns.) and significantly higher DCR (69.0% vs. 37.8%, p < 0.05) comparing to anti-PD-1 alone. After matching, combination group achieved longer progression-free survival (3.87 vs. 2.43 months, p < 0.05) and overall survival (not reached vs. 7.17 months, p < 0.05) than anti-PD-1 alone, without higher grade 3/4 AE (10.3% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.73). The tumor response varied among different metastatic sites, with high responses in adrenal glands, peritoneum and lungs. The more AFP declined (> 10, > 50 and > 66%), the higher the ORR (70, 80 and 92%) and CR rates (30, 35 and 58%) were achieved at day 28. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the combination of anti-PD-1 and sorafenib had better efficacy and survival benefit. A prospective randomized study is needed to confirm this finding.

Emerging roles of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hematological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition is an important process in embryonic development, fibrosis, and cancer metastasis. During the progression of epithelial cancer, activation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition is tightly associated with metastasis, stemness and drug resistance. However, the role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in non-epithelial cancer is relatively unclear. MAIN BODY: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition transcription factors are critical in both myeloid and lymphoid development. Growing evidence indicates their roles in cancer cells to promote leukemia and lymphoma progression. The expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition transcription factors can cause the differentiation of indolent type to the aggressive type of lymphoma. Their up-regulation confers cancer cells resistant to chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and radiotherapy. Conversely, the down-regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition transcription factors, monoclonal antibodies, induce lymphoma cells apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition transcription factors are potentially important prognostic or predictive factors and treatment targets for leukemia and lymphoma.

Cisplatin/Tegafur/Uracil/Irinotecan Triple Combination Therapy for Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase I/II Clinical Study.

LESSONS LEARNED: Cisplatin/tegafur/uracil/irinotecan triple combination therapy shows moderate response, especially in patients without previous chemoradiotherapy within the 6 months before this combination therapy.Toxicity is tolerable, and quality of life is improved in responders. BACKGROUND: The prognosis is poor in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Triple combination therapy may increase tumor response. METHODS: This phase I/II prospective trial first determined the dose-limiting toxicity and recommended dose of irinotecan with cisplatin and tegafur/uracil (UFUR) in phase I. Irinotecan was supplied at doses of 40, 50, 60, and 70 mg/m(2) by using a standard 3+3 design. Doses of cisplatin and UFUR were held stable. In phase II, the recommended dose of irinotecan was administered intravenously (i.v.) over 90 min on day 1, with cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) i.v. over 60 min also on day 1, and oral UFUR 200 mg twice a day for 5 days every 2 weeks a cycle. RESULTS: In the phase I portion, 14 patients were enrolled, and the dose level of irinotecan at 60 mg/m(2) was defined as the recommended dose for the phase II portion of the study. Among 43 patients enrolled in the phase II portion, complete response was seen in 2 patients (4.7%) and partial response in 10 patients (23.3%), and the disease control rate was 39.5%. In a subgroup analysis of patients whose prior chemoradiotherapy was more than 6 months earlier, a response rate of 40.7% and disease control rate of 59.3% were observed. CONCLUSION: Cisplatin/UFUR/irinotecan triple combination therapy is tolerated and effective for selected patients. Individualized choice of treatment will influence prognosis and quality of life in R/M HNSCC patients.

Second primary malignancy risk among patients with gastric cancer: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported an increase in second primary malignancies (SPMs) among gastric cancer patients. METHODS: Patients who were newly diagnosed with gastric cancer between 1997 and 2011 were recruited from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database. Those who had antecedent malignancies or gastrointestinal stromal tumor were excluded. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of SPMs were calculated. Risk factors for cancer development were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards models. Effects of treatments for gastric cancer were treated as time-dependent variables. RESULTS: During the 15-year study period, 47,729 gastric cancer patients were recruited. Overall, 2,110 SPMs developed during a total follow-up of 137,798 person-years. The SIR for all cancers was 1.46. The SIRs for specific follow-up periods were 1.43, 1.41, and 1.21 at >10 years, 5-10 years, and 1-5 years, respectively. After excluding SPMs that developed within 1 year, significantly higher SIRs were seen for cancers of the head and neck (1.34), esophagus (2.16), colon and rectum (1.37), bones and soft tissues (1.95), ovaries (2.89), bladder (1.47), or kidneys (1.44), as well as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (5.56). Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥70 years [hazard ratio (HR) 1.19], being male (HR 1.37), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.30), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.17), and liver cirrhosis (HR 1.94) were independent risk factors. Radiotherapy (HR 1.24) and chemotherapy (HR 1.87) were independent risk factors, but surgery (HR 0.67) was not. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with gastric cancer are at increased risk of developing SPM. Close surveillance of patients with risk factors over a longer period should be considered.

Risk of cancer in children, adolescents, and young adults with autistic disorder.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether individuals with autism have an increased risk for cancer relative to the general population. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled patients with autistic disorder from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database in years 1997-2011. A total of 8438 patients diagnosed with autism were retrieved from the Registry for Catastrophic Illness Patients database. The diagnosis of cancers was also based on the certificate of catastrophic illness, which requires histological confirmation. The risk of cancer among the autism cohort was determined with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR). RESULTS: During the observation period, cancer occurred in 20 individuals with autism, which was significantly higher than a total number of expected cancers with a SIR estimate of 1.94 (95% CI 1.18-2.99). The number of cancer in males was greater than the expected number with a SIR of 1.95 (1.11-3.16), but no excess risk was found for females with a SIR of 1.91 (0.52-4.88). Cancer developed more than expected in individuals age 15-19 years with the SIR of 3.58 (1.44-7.38), but did not differ in other age range groups. The number of cancers of genitourinary system was significantly in excess of the expected number (SIR 4.15; 95% CI 1.13-10.65), and increased risk was found in ovarian cancer with SIR of 9.21 (1.12-33.29). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that patients with autistic disorder have an increased risk of cancer.

The association between prostate cancer and mood disorders: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: This study identified possible risk factors for newly diagnosed mood disorders, including depressive and bipolar disorders, in prostate cancer patients. METHODS: From 2000 to 2006, two cohorts were evaluated on the occurrence of mood disorder diagnosis and treatment. For the first cohort, data of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer was obtained from the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) Research Database. As the second cohort, a cancer-free comparison group was matched for age, comorbidities, geographic region, and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Final analyses involved 12,872 men with prostate cancer and 12,872 matched patients. Increased incidence of both depressive (IRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.30-1.79, P <0.001) and bipolar disorder (IRR 1.84, 95% CI 1.25-2.74, P = 0.001) was observed among patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Multivariate matched regression models show that cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and radiotherapy treatment could be independent risk factors for developing subsequent depressive and bipolar disorders. CONCLUSION: We observed that the risk of developing newly diagnosed depressive and bipolar disorders is higher among Taiwanese prostate cancer patients. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of increased depressive and bipolar disorders among prostate cancer patients in Taiwan. A prospective study is necessary to confirm these findings.

External beam radiation therapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy for patients with unresectable locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared to radiotherapy (RT) for unresectable, locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). METHODOLOGY: Between 2001 and 2010, 34 patients with unresectable locally advanced HCCA at our institute were reviewed. Eighteen patients received RT and 16 patients received CCRT. Survivals and multivariate analyses were performed to explore potential variables affecting survivals. RESULTS: There were 18 males and 16 females, with a median age of 72 years and median follow-up time 9.4 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 10.4 months (95% CI, 6.7-13.5) with the 1-year survival rates of 41%. The median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were 13.5 months and 8.8 months for patients receiving CCRT as compared to 6.7 months and 4.4 months for patients receiving RT alone (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively). On multivariate analysis demonstrated that Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 80 (p = 0.001), pretreatment carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) 200 U/ml (p = 0.045) and CCRT were prognostic factors for OS and PFS. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with RT, CCRT provides longer OS and PFS for patients with unresectable HCCA. The efficacy of adding novel chemotherapeutic to RT needs to be further investigated.

Incorporating Tumor Genomic Profiling and Circulating Tumor Cell-derived Organoids into Clinical Practice for Gastrointestinal Cancers.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Precision medicine aims to revolutionize healthcare by tailoring treatment regimens. This study aimed to integrate comprehensive tumor genomic profiling (CTGP) by targeted-gene panel sequencing and drug screening by circulating tumor cell-derived organoids (CTOs) into clinical practice for the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients with various GI cancers underwent CTGP and CTO drug sensitivity testing. CTGP results guided targeted therapy and immunotherapy, while CTO drug sensitivity predicted response to chemotherapy and targeted agents. The drug recommendations from two platforms were correlated with the treatment response to the suggested medications retrospectively. RESULTS: Five patients received therapies aligned with CTGP, including HER2-targeted treatment, immunotherapy, and BRAF/MEK dual inhibition, showing positive responses. CTO drug sensitivity predicted progression under regorafenib (low potential benefit) and good response to chemotherapy with high potential benefit. The combination of CTGP and CTO drug sensitivity may exhibit significant correlation with clinical outcomes during treatment with candidate drugs, demonstrating a sensitivity of 79% and an accuracy of 75%. This encompasses various treatment modalities, such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: The present investigation elucidated the integration of CTGP and CTO drug sensitivity screening into clinical practice in a complementary manner, showcasing a significant correlation between treatment response and testing outcomes. Additional prospective evaluation of these two testing modalities in a large cohort is warranted to confirm whether the inclusion of CTO drug sensitivity screening confers enhanced survival benefits compared to utilizing CTGP alone.

Outcomes of Post-Immunotherapy Durable Responders of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma- with Emphasis on Locoregional Therapy for Oligoprogression.

Introduction: The progression patterns, dispositions, and outcomes of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who achieved durable responses with immunotherapy remain poorly characterized. Methods: Patients with advanced HCC who received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy and achieved durable responses were retrospectively included. A durable response was defined as partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) per RECIST 1.1 for more than 8 months after initiation of immunotherapy. Oligoprogression and polyprogression were defined as progression at ≤3 and >3 lesions, respectively. Results: A total of 91 durable responders (63 PR and 28 SD) were identified. The majority had chronic viral hepatitis (n = 69, 75.8%). Forty-seven (51.6%) and 44 (48.4%) patients received the index immunotherapy as first-line and second- or beyond-line therapy, respectively. Fifty-four (59.3%) patients subsequently developed progression, with a predominant pattern of oligoprogression (66.7%). The median overall survival (OS) was 46.2 months (95% CI: 34.1-58.3). For patients with subsequent progression, employment of locoregional therapy (LRT) for progression was associated with prolonged OS (univariate analysis: hazard ratio [HR] 0.397, p = 0.009; multivariate analysis: HR 0.363, p = 0.050). Patients with oligoprogression who received LRT showed longer median OS than those who did not (48.4 vs. 20.5 months, p < 0.001). In contrast, the median OS of patients with polyprogression who received LRT was not different from those without LRT (27.7 vs. 25.5 months, p = 0.794). Conclusion: Approximately 60% of the post-immunotherapy durable responders of HCC subsequently develop progression. Proactive LRT may further rescue patients who develop subsequent oligoprogression. Prospective studies are mandatory to clarify the proper management of durable responders with subsequent progression.

Pulse corticosteroid therapy in the treatment of steroid-refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis: Case report and review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated promising therapeutic outcomes in treating a variety of malignancies, but immune-related adverse events (irAE) may develop. Among all the irAE, immune-related pneumonitis was relatively common and life-threatening. High-dose corticosteroid was recommended for the initial management, but a part of patients developed steroid-refractory pneumonitis. Other immunosuppressants were recommended, but the optimal treatment is still controversial. Here, we report two cases of steroid-refractory immune-related pneumonitis who were successfully treated with pulse corticosteroid therapy. Case 1 was hepatocellular carcinoma treated with nivolumab for 5 months. She developed acute respiratory distress syndrome due to grade 4 immune-related pneumonitis that was refractory to intravenous methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day treatment. Methylprednisolone 500 mg for 3 days followed by 2 mg/kg/day steroid as maintenance therapy was given. Subsequently, her pneumonitis was regressed, and the endotracheal tube was successfully removed on day 9 after the start of pulse therapy. Case 2 presented with grade 4 immune-related pneumonitis in spite the use of methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg for his skin rash. Pulse corticosteroid therapy was prescribed, then his pneumonitis was completely regressed on day 12. In this report, we demonstrated the potential role of pulse corticosteroid therapy for steroid-refractory pneumonitis.

Durable response to olaparib combined low-dose cisplatin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with FANCA mutation: A case report.

RATIONALE: To date, there is no actionable gene has been discovered in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tumor cells with DNA damage response and repair (DDR) gene loss-of-function mutation is sensitivity to poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum chemotherapy in ovarian, prostate and pancreatic cancers. There is a case report demonstrated the efficacy of PARP inhibitor for BRCA2 mutation that belongs to DDR gene in HCC, which suggested the potential role of PARP inhibitor for HCC with DDR gene mutation. PATIENT CONCERNS: We reported a 44-year-old woman with non-viral HCC who was refractory to multiple treatment including target therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy. The tumor tissue was submitted to next-generation sequencing using the commercially available ACTOnco®+ (ACT Genomics, Taiwan) assay that interrogates 440 and 31 cancer-related genes and fusion genes, respectively. DIAGNOSIS: A truncating mutation FANCA p.Q1307fs was also observed. The tumor was microsatellite stable and had low tumor mutational burden of 4.5 muts/Mb. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: Given FANCA belongs to DDR genes, the inactivation evoked the idea of using PARP inhibitor and cisplatin. Therefore, the patient started to use olaparib combined with low-dose cisplatin (30 mg/m2, every 4 weeks) therapy in December 2019. Significant reduction in the tumor marker level in 1 month (PIVKA-II from 17,395 to 411 ng/dL) and follow-up CT scan showed stable disease. Her tumor did not progress until December 2020 with a progression-free survival of 12 months. LESSONS: We report the first case of FANCA-mutated HCC that responded well to olaparib and low-dose cisplatin. This addressed the potential therapeutic role of DDR gene mutation in HCC and the possible synergistic effect of PARP inhibitor and cisplatin. These findings highlight areas where further investigation and effort are needed.

Upregulation of USP22 and ABCC1 during Sorafenib Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Contribute to Development of Resistance.

Sorafenib is a small molecule that blocks tumor proliferation by targeting the activity of multi-kinases for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Increasing sorafenib resistance following long-term treatment is frequently encountered. Mechanisms underlying sorafenib resistance remain not completely clear. To further understand the mechanism of sorafenib resistance in HCC, we established sorafenib-resistant cell lines by slowly increasing sorafenib concentration in cell culture medium. Upregulation of USP22 and ABCC1 were found in Sorafenib-resistant cells. Sorafenib-resistant cells treated with USP22 siRNA showed significant reduction in endogenous mRNA and protein levels of ABCC1. During sorafenib treatment, upregulation of USP22 increases ABCC1 expression and subsequently contributes to sorafenib resistance in HCC cells. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a positive correlation between USP22 and ABCC1 expression in tissue samples from sorafenib-resistant patients (Pearson's correlation = 0.59, p = 0.03). Our findings indicate that upregulation of USP22 and ABCC1 expression during treatment contribute to sorafenib resistance in HCC cells and that USP22 has strong potential as a therapeutic target for overcoming sorafenib resistance in HCC patients.

Prognosis and treatment pattern of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of first-line atezolizumab and bevacizumab treatment.

BACKGROUND: The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) has become the standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the prognosis and treatment pattern after its treatment failure are unclear. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who failed first-line Atezo-Bev treatment for advanced HCC from January 2018 to May 2021 in four Taiwan medical centers. Post-first-line survival (PFLS) was defined as the date from the failure of Atezo-Bev treatment to the date of death or last follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were included in the study. All patients had Child-Pugh A liver reserve before the initiation of Atezo-Bev treatment, but the liver reserve of 6 (15%) and 7 (17%) patients deteriorated to Child-Pugh B and C, respectively, after treatment failure. The median PFLS was 5.9 months. PFLS significantly differed among patients with various liver reserves after the failure of Atezo-Bev treatment (median 9.6 vs 3.8 vs 1.2 months, for Child-Pugh A, B, and C; p < 0.001). In total, 30 (73%) patients received second-line systemic therapy, and they exhibited significantly longer PFLS (median 8.0 vs 1.8 months, p = 0.033) than patients who did not. Deteriorated liver function and not receiving second-line therapy remained associated with inferior PFLS in multivariate analysis. The most common second-line therapies were sorafenib (n = 19, 63%) and lenvatinib (n = 9, 30%), with no significant differences in efficacies. CONCLUSION: Receiving second-line therapy and good liver reserve were associated with favorable PFLS after the failure of first-line Atezo-Bev treatment.

Determinants of Survival and Post-Progression Outcomes by Sorafenib-Regorafenib Sequencing for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

The predictors of response and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving regorafenib remain unclear. This study aimed to delineate the determinants of response and survival after regorafenib and evaluate post-progression treatment and outcomes. We retrospectively enrolled 108 patients with unresectable HCC receiving regorafenib after sorafenib failure. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), post-progression survival (PPS) and post-progression treatments were evaluated. The median PFS, OS and PPS were 3.1, 13.1 and 10.3 months, respectively. Achieving disease control by prior sorafenib, early AFP reduction and hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) were associated with significantly better radiologic responses. By multivariate analysis, the time to progression on prior sorafenib, HFSR and early AFP reduction were associated with PFS; ALBI grade, portal vein invasion, HFSR and early AFP reduction were associated with OS. ALBI grade at disease progression, main portal vein invasion, high tumor burden and next-line therapy were associated with PPS. The median PPS was 12 months in patients who received next-line therapy, and the PPS was comparable between patients who received next-line targeted agents and immunotherapy. In conclusion, survival outcomes of regorafenib for HCC have improved in the era of multi-line sequential therapy. Preserved liver function and next-line therapy are important prognostic factors after regorafenib failure.

Durable objective response to sorafenib and role of sequential treatment in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background: The response rate to sorafenib is limited for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Little is known about the long-term outcomes of objective responders. The role of second-line therapies on the survival of sorafenib-responders is unclear. We aimed to delineate the long-term outcomes and the role of subsequent treatment after responding to sorafenib. Methods: From September 2012 to December 2019, 922 patients who received sorafenib treatment for unresectable HCC were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 21 (2.3%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 54 (5.9%) had a partial response (PR) based on mRECIST criteria. Factors associated with survivals were analyzed. Results: During the median follow-up of 35.3 months, the median duration of response was 18.3 months (range: 2.3-45.5) for patients achieving CR and 10.0 months (range: 1.9-60.3) for PR. The median overall survival (OS) was 39.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 28.4-50.5] including values not yet estimable for CR and 25.8 months for PR. Patients who experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) had better median OS than those without (44.9 versus 18.1 months, p = 0.003). Eventually, 53 patients developed tumor progression; 30 patients received second-line systemic treatment including nivolumab (n = 8), regorafenib (n = 15), and chemotherapy (n = 7). Sorafenib-nivolumab sequential therapy provided the best median OS versus sorafenib-regorafenib and sorafenib-chemotherapy in these patients (55.8, 39.5, and 25.5 months), respectively. Conclusions: The response is durable for advanced HCC patients with CR or PR to sorafenib. Subsequent immunotherapy seems to provide the best survival. This information is important for characterizing outcomes of sorafenib-responders and the choice of sequential treatment.

A Single-Arm Phase Ib/II Study of Lenvatinib plus Eribulin in Advanced Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: Satisfactory treatment options for advanced leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma are limited. The LEADER study (NCT03526679) investigated the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib plus eribulin. METHODS: LEADER is a multicenter phase Ib/II study for advanced leiomyosarcoma or liposarcoma. The phase Ib part enrolled 6 patients to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) with the starting dose of lenvatinib 18 mg/day and eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 D1, D8 every 21 days. The primary endpoint of the phase II part was objective response rate (ORR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, with phase Ib patients preplanned to be included in the efficacy analysis. Translational analyses were based on the transcriptomic data obtained from the NanoString nCounter platform. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled (leiomyosarcoma 21, liposarcoma 9); the median age was 59. One patient had to temporarily stop lenvatinib due to grade 2 arthritis in the first cycle, meeting DLT criteria. Four of 6 patients had to decrease the dose of lenvatinib to 14 mg between cycles two and three. RP2D was determined at lenvatinib 14 mg/day and eribulin 1.1 mg/m2. The confirmed ORR was 20%, and the ORR was not significantly different between phase Ib/II cohorts (P = 0.23). The median progression-free survival was 8.56 months (95% confidence interval, 4.40-not reached). Translational studies suggested increased dendritic cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib plus eribulin has a manageable safety profile and exhibits promising efficacy for treating advanced leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma.

Impaired Chromatin Remodeling Predicts Better Survival to Modified Gemcitabine and S-1 plus Nivolumab in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Phase II T1219 Study.

PURPOSE: Modified gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) is an active regimen for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC) in our previous study. Herein, we report the results of a single-arm phase II of nivolumab plus modified GS (NGS) as first-line treatment in ABTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received nivolumab 240 mg and 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine on day 1 plus daily 80/100/120 mg of S-1 (based on body surface area) on days 1 to 10, in a 2-week cycle. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The correlation between therapeutic efficacy and genetic alterations with signatures identified by targeted next-generation sequencing panels was explored. RESULTS: Between December 2019 and December 2020, 48 eligible patients were enrolled. After a median of 17.6 months of follow-up, the ORR was 45.9% [95% confidence interval (CI), 31.4%-60.8%]. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 9.1 (95% CI, 5.8-9.6) and 19.2 (95% CI, 11.6-not reached) months, respectively. All grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AE) were less than 10%, except fatigue (14.6%) and skin rash (10.4%). Eighteen patients (35.4%) experienced immune-related AEs without treatment-related death. High tumor mutational burden (TMB-H; top 20%; ≥7.1 mut/Mb) only predicted prolonged median PFS but not OS. Up to 28.9% of patients who harbored loss-of-function mutations in chromatin remodeling genes demonstrated significantly longer median PFS and OS than those without alterations. CONCLUSIONS: NGS is a safe and promising regimen in ABTC. Impaired functions of chromatin remodeling genes may be a potential surrogate biomarker with predictive value in this study.