[Multicenter evaluation of four homogenous LDL-cholesterol assays]. / Evaluation multicentrique de quatre méthodes de dosage direct du cholestérol-LDL.

International guidelines emphasize the importance of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) assay in the care and follow-up of patients with cardiovascular risk. Most studies and common practice use Friedewald's formula for LDL-C calculation. The accuracy of the result depends closely on the precision of the input parameters (total cholesterol, triglycerides (TG) and HDL cholesterol), and discrepancies between calculated LDL-C and measurement by reference methods appear when TG exceed 4.5 mmol/L, or in the presence of abnormal lipoproteins. These restrictions and uncertainties in calculations have prompted the recent development of direct and homogeneous methods that fit all analyzers. A multicenter evaluation of four direct assays of LDL-C (Daiichi, Denka Seiken, Kyowa, Wako) was carried out on 45 serum samples (TG below 3.1 mmol/L) in eight laboratories using different analyzers. For three methods (Daiichi, Kyowa, Wako), the interlaboratory reproducibility was markedly improved relative to that of calculation. A strong correlation was found for all new methods when compared with a beta-quantification assay. Average bias in Denka Seiken assays was greater than Kyowa's and Daiichi's (although less dispersed for the latter) and for Wako all bias were positive. The relationship between bias variations and the lipid parameters of the samples was studied. Three methods, Daiichi, Kyowa and Wako, revealed a significant positive correlation between bias and serum VLDL-C/TG ratio, clearly indicating that cholesterol enrichment of VLDL was a source of variability in these assays. Specificity of the four methods was tested in situation of dyslipidemia by spiking isolated lipoproteins (chylomicrons, VLDL and HDL). This experiment revealed differences in behavior, most evidently upon addition of VLDL. No method was truly specific, but up to 8 mmol/L of TG the variations were acceptable. In the presence of type III hyperlipoproteinemia, however, only the Denka Seiken method was reliable. Linearity up to 20 mmol/L (Daiichi, Denka Seiken) or 14 mmol/L (Kyowa, Wako) of LDL-C allows these tests to be used in main routine cases. New direct assays are an obvious technological advance in terms of analytical performance and conveniency. Their use for the diagnosis and follow-up of hyperlipidemic patients offers an alternative that overcomes the limitations of the Friedewald calculation.

Characterization of two HDL subfractions and LpA-I, LpA-I:A-II distribution profiles and clinical characteristics of hyperalphalipoproteinemic subjects without cholesterol ester transfer protein deficiency.

The aims of the present study were (i) to characterize the HDL2, HDL3 and the LpA-I, LpA-I:A-II distribution, (ii) to investigate the prevalence of atherosclerotic lesions and (iii) to assess the activity of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) in 29 hyperalphalipoproteinemic (HALP) patients (HDL-C=90+/-11 mg/dl) with combined hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C=180+/-16 mg/dl). According to the HDL2/HDL3 and LpA-I/LpA-I:A-II ratios, two HALP profiles (A and B) were defined: in 22 patients (HALP profile A) these ratios were increased compared to the normolipidemic control subjects (1.19+/-0.11 versus 0.53+/-0.19, P < 0.001 and 1.01+/-0.2 versus 0.51+/-0.25, P < 0.001, respectively) and in seven patients (HALP profile B) these ratios were within the normal range (0.64+/-0.20 and 0.69+/-0.2, respectively). The atherosclerotic lesions were assessed by ultrasonography of the carotid arteries. Amongst patients with HALP profile A, 17 were free from lesions, five had intimal wall thickening and none displayed plaques, whereas for patients within the HALP profile B, only one was free from lesions, two had intimal wall thickening and four displayed plaques. CETP activities (348+/-116 versus 371+/-75%/ml/h) and CETP concentrations (2.4+/-0.5 versus 2.5+/-0.6 microg/ml) were similar in HALP profiles A and B, however these values were both higher than in control subjects (190+/-40%/ml/h, P < 0.001 and 1.8+/-0.3 microg/ml, P < 0.001, respectively). Hence the hyperalphalipoproteinemic profiles (A and B) described here were not related to CETP deficiency. In conclusion, the HALP profile A was characterized by both increased HDL2/HDL3 and LpA-I/LpA-I:A-II ratios and was associated with a low prevalence of atherosclerosis, whereas the HALP profile B, characterized by HDL2/HDL3 and LpA-I/LpA-I:A-II ratios within the normal range, was less cardioprotective.

Interpretation of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 levels is influenced by cardiac disease, comorbidities, extension of atherosclerosis and treatments.

PURPOSE: Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) is an inflammatory biomarker secreted in the atherosclerotic plaque. Blood levels of Lp-PLA2 predict future cardiovascular events in patients with ischemic disease and heart failure. This association seems to be independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. The aims of our study were (1) to assess relationships between Lp-PLA2 levels, cardiac disease and treatments; (2) to evaluate the association of Lp-PLA2 level with the severity of angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) and the extracoronary atherosclerosis. METHODS: Between December 2009 and June 2010, 494 subjects were recruited from a population scheduled for diagnostic coronary angiography. Routine clinical (age, gender, BMI and treatment), cardiac (echocardiography, coronarography, carotid ultrasonography) and biochemical parameters were recorded for all patients. Lp-PLA2 mass concentration was assessed in serum with a Plac®-test turbidimetric immunoassay. Control Lp-PLA2 values were specifically obtained in 61 healthy subjects aged 44.5 ± 17.6 years (range: 25 to 59 years) without known cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia) or cardiac treatment. RESULTS: In healthy controls, mean Lp-PLA2 level was 163 ± 43 µg/L (166 ± 45 µg/L in men and 159 ± 39 µg/L in women, non significant difference). In our cohort of 494 patients (69.8% men) aged 64.2 ± 16.7 years, the main etiologies of cardiomyopathies were ischemic (40%), valvular (22%), cardiac failure with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (14%), infection (5%) and aortic aneurysm (7%). Mean Lp-PLA2 levels were 216 ± 17 µg/L. Lp-PLA2 correlated with age, BMI, current smoking, history of hypertension but not with diabetes and gender. The bivariate analysis showed a significant correlation between Lp-PLA2, and BMI (p=0.001) but no correlation with serum creatinine or NYHA status. A multivariate correlation showed that Lp-PLA2 was associated with total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and apoB (r=0.95, p<0.0001) but not with Lp(a). We observed that Lp-PLA2 was significantly associated with treatments such as statins and ACEi/ARA2 but not with ß-blockers, antiaggregant drugs or diuretics. Lp-PLA2 levels were significantly higher in patients with CAD than in patients without CAD (223 ± 54 vs. 208 ± 52 µg/L, respectively; p<0.007). Moreover, Lp-PLA2 levels were significantly higher in patients with the most extensive angiographic CAD [single (n=24)=215.2 ± 52 µg/L; two (n=55)=222 ± 53 µg/L and three vessels (n=140)=251.9 ± 53.7 µg/L, respectively; p<0.0001]. Patients with heart failure, sepsis or aortic aneurysm had increased Lp-PLA2 levels: 256.2 ± 46.8; 226.7 ± 47.3; 218.1 ± 38.9 µg/L, respectively, as compared to controls (p<0.0001). In patients with carotid artery disease, Lp-PLA2 significantly increased with the severity of atherosclerosis. Mean Lp-PLA2 levels were 218.8 ± 51 µg/L in the group without any stenosis (n=108), 224 ± 51 µg/L in the group with mild stenosis (n=101), and 231 ± 46 µg/L in the group with severe stenosis (n=22); p=0.004. CONCLUSION: This study clearly shows that interpretation of Lp-PLA2 levels needs a good assessment of cardiac parameters and treatments, especially statins and ACEi/ARA2. Lp-PLA2 levels are significantly associated with coronary heart disease and with the extension of extra coronary disease after adjustment for age and gender.

Analytic solutions of the rayleigh equation for linear density profiles

We consider the Rayleigh-Taylor instability in linear density profiles and we derive the exact analytic expressions of the growth rates and associated eigenfunctions. We study the behavior of the multiple eigenvalues in both the short- and the long-wavelength limit. As the largest eigenvalue gamma(max) reduces to the classical Rayleigh growth rate; the other eigenvalues vanish as the front thickness tends to zero. Furthermore, the simple expression of gamma(max) exact to first order in the long-wavelength limit differs from the widely used estimate sqrt[Akg/(1+AkL0)], where g is the acceleration, A the Atwood number, k the wave number of the perturbation, and L0 the minimum density gradient scale length.