A national Delphi study: experiences of general practitioner (GP) trainees in the Republic of Ireland undertaking online small group learning as part of the GP Training Programme during COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, GP training day release was redirected from face-to-face to an online setting. With this study, our aim was to assess trainee experiences of online small group learning and to make recommendations with regards to future GP training. METHODS: A qualitative study using the Delphi survey technique, approved by the Irish College of General Practitioners (ICGP) Ethics Committee. A series of three sequential online questionnaires were sent to our trainee cohort in all 14 training schemes in Ireland. The first questionnaire explored GP trainee experiences and key themes were generated. Subsequent questionnaires were developed using these themes, with second and third round questionnaires establishing consensus on these experiences. RESULTS: In total, 64 GP trainees responded. Each training scheme was represented. Response rates for round 1 and 2 were 76% and 56% respectively, with round 3 currently underway. Trainees felt that online teaching was convenient, reduced commuting costs, and provided peer support. They also reported loss in unstructured discussion, practical teaching sessions and relationship building. Seven key themes were generated: future format of GP training; accessibility and flexibility; teaching experience; provision of GP training; support and collegiality; educational experience; and technical problems. There is a consensus that some online teaching should be retained for the future. DISCUSSION: Online teaching provided a continuation in training that was more convenient and accessible but affected social interactions and relationship building amongst trainees. Future online sessions could be utilised in a hybrid model of teaching going forward.

Surgical Management of Idiopathic Perianal Fistulas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Perianal fistula is a common colorectal condition with an incidence of 9 per 100,000. Many surgical treatments exist, all aiming to eliminate symptoms with minimal risk of recurrence and impact upon continence. Despite extensive evaluation of the therapeutic modalities, no clear consensus exists as to what is the gold standard approach. This systematic review aimed to examine all available evidence pertaining to the surgical management of perianal fistulas. Primary outcomes examined were recurrence and incontinence. SUMMARY: This study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcomes were analyzed for each group and expressed as pooled odds ratio with confidence intervals of 95%. 687 studies were identified from which 28 relevant studies were included. There was no significant difference in rates of incontinence identified between various surgical approaches. Glues and plugs show higher recurrence rates. Newer treatments continue to emerge with promise but lack supporting evidence of benefit over conventional therapies. Key Messages: While we await more robust randomized data, we will continue to proceed cautiously trying to offset the benefits of fistula healing against the inherent risk of altered continence.