The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global neurosurgical education: a systematic review.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted neurosurgical training worldwide, with the shutdown of academic institutions and the reduction of elective surgical procedures. This impact has disproportionately affected LMICs (lower- and/or middle-income countries), already burdened by a lack of neurosurgical resources. Thus, a systematic review was conducted to examine these challenges and innovations developed to adapt effective teaching and learning for medical students and neurosurgical trainees. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and The Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were accessed, searching and screening literature from December 2019 to 5th December 2020 with set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Screening identified 1254 articles of which 26 were included, providing data from 96 countries. Twenty-three studies reported transition to online learning, with 8 studies also mentioned redeployment into COVID wards with 2 studies mentioning missed surgical exposure as a consequence. Of 7 studies conducted in LMICs, 3 reported residents suffering financial insecurities from reduced surgical caseload and recession. Significant global disruption in neurosurgical teaching and training has arisen from the COVID-19 pandemic. Decreased surgical exposure has negatively impacted educational provision. However, advancements in virtual technology have allowed for more affordable, accessible training especially in LMICs. Using this, initiatives to reduce physical and mental stress experienced by trainees should be paramount.

Is cerebrospinal fluid sampling necessary at the time of first ventriculo-peritoneal shunt insertion in paediatric patients?

OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate whether intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling during ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunt insertion can predict future VP shunt infection or guide its management. METHODS: 83 paediatric patients undergoing VP shunt insertion between February 2013 and July 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics, presence of pre-operative extra ventricular drain (EVD), pre-operative CSF results, and intra-operative CSF results were identified from patient case notes and electronic clinical databases. All included patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months for identification of shunt infection. RESULTS: 90 VP shunt insertions were performed in 83 patients. Age at time of shunt insertion ranged from 5 days to 15.8 years (mean 44.2 months). Tumours were the most common aetiology for hydrocephalus (n = 24). 67 cases (74.4%) had intra-operative CSF samples, of which 2 revealed the presence of bacteria. Only 1 patient with intra-operative CSF sampling positive for growth developed shunt infection during follow up. Two cases developed a shunt infection despite normal intra-operative CSF results. Three cases did not have intra-operative CSF sampling but developed a shunt infection during follow up. Intra-operative CSF culture achieved 33.3% sensitivity and 98.4% specificity for predicting future shunt infection (p = 0.154). The Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve of intra-operative white cell count (WCC) and shunt infection at 6 months follow up yielded an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 50.3%. CONCLUSION: Our results show that intraoperative CSF sampling as a method to predict future risk of shunt infection and to help inform future antibiotic prescribing is unreliable. Given an AUC of 50.3%, it is no better than chance as a diagnostic tool. Further larger studies are needed to substantiate this.