Prophylaxis for paediatric emergence delirium in desflurane-based anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The prevalence of postoperative emergence delirium in paediatric patients (pedED) following desflurane anaesthesia is considerably high at 50-80%. Although several pharmacological prophylactic strategies have been introduced to reduce the risk of pedED, conclusive evidence about the superiority of these individual regimens is lacking. The aim of the current study was to assess the potential prophylactic effect and safety of individual pharmacotherapies in the prevention of pedED following desflurane anaesthesia. METHODS: This frequentist model network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included peer-reviewed RCTs of either placebo-controlled or active-controlled design in paediatric patients under desflurane anaesthesia. RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 573 participants were included. Overall, the ketamine + propofol administration [odds ratio (OR) = 0.05, 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) 0.01-0.33], dexmedetomidine alone (OR = 0.13, 95%CIs 0.05-0.31), and propofol administration (OR = 0.30, 95%CIs 0.10-0.91) were associated with a significantly lower incidence of pedED than the placebo/control groups. In addition, only gabapentin and dexmedetomidine were associated with a significantly higher improvement in the severity of emergence delirium than the placebo/control groups. Finally, the ketamine + propofol administration was associated with the lowest incidence of pedED, whereas gabapentin was associated with the lowest severity of pedED among all of the pharmacologic interventions studied. CONCLUSIONS: The current NMA showed that ketamine + propofol administration was associated with the lowest incidence of pedED among all of the pharmacologic interventions studied. Future large-scale trials to more fully elucidate the comparative benefits of different combination regimens are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021285200.

Effect of Intraoperative Phrenic Nerve Infiltration on Postoperative Ipsilateral Shoulder Pain After Thoracic Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis was aimed at investigating the effectiveness and safety of phrenic nerve infiltration (PNI) against ipsilateral shoulder pain (ISP) after thoracic surgery. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING: Operating room. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing thoracic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: PNI. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases were searched from inception through December 2021. The primary outcome was the overall incidence of ISP, with secondary outcomes including incidence and severity of ISP at postoperative 6, 24, and 48 hours. Six RCTs involving 482 patients undergoing thoracic surgery were included. Pooled results found a significantly lower incidence of overall ISP in patients with PNI (ie, 23.6%) compared to those without (ie, 53.2%; risk ratio: 0.46, 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.61; I2 = 19%; 6 RCTs; n = 474; certainty of evidence = high). At postoperative 6, 24, and 48 hours, there was also a significantly lower incidence of ISP in the PNI group than in the control group (certainty of evidence for all outcomes = high). Besides, the severity of ISP was lower in the PNI group at 6 (certainty of evidence = moderate) and 24 hours (certainty of evidence = high), with insufficient data for analysis at 48 hours because of only 1 trial. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that PNI not only reduced the incidence but also improved the severity of ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracic surgery with a prophylactic effect lasting up to 48 hours. The limited number of included studies warrants further research to support these findings.

The effect of cricoid pressure on tracheal intubation in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of cricoid pressure (CP) application on intubation outcomes. SOURCE: Electronic databases (i.e., MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane review) were searched from inception to 2 June 2020 for randomized-controlled trials that assessed the intubation outcomes in adult patients using laryngoscopic approaches with and without the application of CP (i.e., CP vs non-CP group). The primary outcome was the successful first-attempt intubation rate (SFAIR), and the secondary outcomes were intubation time, incidences of poor laryngoscopic views (i.e., Cormack and Lehane grade 3-4), airway complications, and pulmonary aspiration. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of five trials (published from 2005 to 2018) were included, and all tracheal intubations were performed by anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists with a video (n = 3) or Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 2) in the operating room. We found no significant difference in SFAIR (risk ratio [RR], 0.98; P = 0.37), incidence of poor laryngoscopic views (RR, 1.49; P = 0.21), and risk of sore throat (RR, 1.17; P = 0.73) between the two groups. Nevertheless, the intubation time on the first successful attempt was slightly longer (weighted mean difference = 4.40 sec, P = 0.002) and risk of hoarseness was higher (RR, 1.70; P = 0.03) in the CP group compared with in the non-CP group. The secondary outcome "pulmonary aspiration" was not analyzed because only one trial was available. CONCLUSION: The application of CP did not have a negative impact on the SFAIR or laryngoscopic view. Nevertheless, this maneuver may slightly prolong intubation time and increase the risk of postoperative hoarseness.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF : Cette méta-analyse a pour but d'évaluer l'impact de l'application d'une pression cricoïdienne (PC) sur les résultats de l'intubation. SOURCE : Les bases de données électroniques (c.-à-d., MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, et Cochrane review) ont été examinées de leur création jusqu'au 2 juin 2020 pour en tirer les études randomisées contrôlées évaluant les résultats d'intubation chez les patients adultes utilisant des approches laryngoscopiques avec ou sans application de PC (soit groupe PC et non-PC). Le critère d'évaluation principal était le taux d'intubations réussies à la première tentative, et les critères secondaires incluaient le temps d'intubation, l'incidence de mauvaises vues laryngoscopies (grades 3-4 de Cormack et Lehane), les complications au niveau des voies aériennes et l'aspiration pulmonaire. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES : Cinq études au total (publiées entre 2005 et 2018) ont été incluses, et toutes les intubations trachéales ont été réalisées par des anesthésiologistes ou infirmiers anesthésistes à l'aide d'un vidéolaryngoscope (n = 3) ou d'une lame de Macintosh (n = 2) en salle d'opération. Nous n'avons trouvé aucune différence significative dans le taux d'intubations réussies à la première tentative (risque relatif [RR], 0,98; P = 0,37), dans l'incidence de mauvaises vues laryngoscopiques (RR, 1,49; P = 0,21) ou dans le risque de maux de gorge (RR, 1,17; P = 0,73) entre les deux groupes. En revanche, le temps d'intubation lors de la première tentative réussie était légèrement plus long (différence moyenne pondérée = 4,40 sec, P = 0,002) et le risque d'enrouement était plus élevé (RR, 1,70; P = 0,03) dans le groupe PC que dans le groupe non-PC. Le critère d'évaluation secondaire « aspiration pulmonaire ¼ n'a pas été analysé parce qu'une seule étude le mesurait. CONCLUSION : L'application de PC n'a pas eu d'impact négatif sur le taux d'intubations réussies à la première tentative ou la vue laryngoscopique. Par contre, cette manœuvre pourrait légèrement prolonger le temps d'intubation et augmenter le risque d'enrouement postopératoire.

Efficacy and airway complications of Parker Flex-Tip tubes and standard endotracheal tubes during airway manipulation: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite reported superior intubation outcomes associated with Parker Flex-Tip (PFT) tubes compared with those associated with standard polyvinylchloride tubes, the efficacy and safety of PFT tubes remain uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To compare the intubation outcomes between PFT and conventional standard polyvinylchloride tubes. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Medline, Google Scholar, PubMed and the Cochrane controlled trials register from inception until 3 January 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All randomised trials comparing intubation outcomes between PFT (PFT group) and standard polyvinylchloride (standard polyvinylchloride group) tubes. RESULTS: Analysis of the 13 eligible trials showed no significant difference in successful first-attempt intubation rate [risk ratio (RR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99 to 1.44] (6 trials, 568 participants), trauma risk (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.03) (5 trials, 501 participants) as well as the overall risks of epistaxis (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.31) (3 trials, 262 participants), sore throat (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.17) (4 trials, 451 participants) and hoarseness (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.14) (4 trials, 451 participants) between the two groups. However, the intubation time was slightly shorter (weighted mean difference -4.2 s, 95% CI -7.4 to -1.0 s) (8 trials, 759 participants) and the risks of severe epistaxis (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.84) (3 trials, 262 participants) and overall difficulty in airway manipulation (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.80) (8 trials, 647 participants) were lower in the PFT group than those in the standard polyvinylchloride group. Trial sequential analysis conclusively confirmed a shorter intubation time with PFT tubes than with standard polyvinylchloride tubes, whereas other intubation outcomes were inconclusive. CONCLUSION: The use of PFT tubes for airway manipulation was associated with a shorter intubation time compared with the standard polyvinylchloride tubes. The results of trial sequential analysis suggest the need for further trials and meta-analysis to compare other intubation outcomes associated with the two devices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020197670.

Adverse respiratory events with sevoflurane compared with desflurane in ambulatory surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of studies have concluded that the number of adverse events in the upper airway caused by desflurane does not differ significantly from the number of adverse events caused by sevoflurane. The advantages of desflurane in ambulatory surgery should be reassessed. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare adverse respiratory events and recovery outcomes in patients undergoing desflurane or sevoflurane-based anaesthesia in ambulatory surgery. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: A systematic search for eligible RCTs in PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ScienceDirect and Embase published up to June 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: RCTs investigating the occurrence of adverse respiratory events, including airway irritation, stridor, coughing, respiratory distress and laryngospasm, emergence agitation, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to eye opening and time to discharge from the operation room after desflurane or sevoflurane-based anaesthesia. RESULTS: Thirteen trials were included and analysed. A total of 634 patients were included in the desflurane group, and 633 patients in the sevoflurane group. The occurrence of respiratory complications was significantly higher with desflurane-based anaesthesia than with sevoflurane-based anaesthesia (Total n = 673, 20.0 vs. 12.8%, relative risk (RR) 1.59 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.20)) with low heterogeneity (I = 20%). There was no difference in the occurrence of emergence agitation (Total n = 626, 29.1 vs. 27.2%, RR 1.05 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.30)) or the incidence of PONV between the desflurane and sevoflurane groups (Total n = 989, 19.0 vs. 21.0%, RR 0.95 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.26)). Time to eye opening was significantly faster with desflurane than that with sevoflurane (Total n = 1072, mean difference = -3.32 min (95% CI -4.02 to -2.61)) with a substantial heterogeneity (I = 72.6%). There was no significant difference in the time to discharge from the operation room between the two groups (Total n = 1056, mean difference = -0.45 min (95% CI -5.89 to 4.99)). CONCLUSION: Despite recent reports that there is no significant difference in adverse respiratory events between desflurane and sevoflurane, a pooled analysis revealed that desflurane resulted in a higher rate than sevoflurane. Therefore, the consequences of desflurane should not be neglected and its airway irritant properties should be taken into account. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42019147939).

Intraoperative identification and definition of "functional" lymphatic collecting vessels for supermicrosurgical lymphatico-venous anastomosis in treating lymphedema patients.

BACKGROUND: For current lymphatico-venous anastomosis (LVA), the identification of "functional" lymphatic collecting vessels (LCVs) is mainly based on indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography. However, some of the non-ICG enhanced LCVs utilized for LVA were found to have visual lymphatic flow. OBJECTIVES: Should non-ICG enhanced, but flow-positive LCVs be considered functional as well? METHODS: A retrospective study with 56 consecutive lymphedema patients (8 male/48 female) received LVA. LCVs were observed after ICG injection, before/after LVAs were performed. ICG enhancement and lymphatic flow in the LCVs were recorded and grouped as: Group A: all LCVs ICG(+) and flow(+); Group B: all LCVs ICG(+) and some were flow(+); Group C: some ICG(+) and some flow(+) LCVs; Group D: all LCVs ICG(-)but all flow(+); and Group E: all LCVs were both ICG(-) and flow(-). RESULTS: A total of 366 LCVs were identified, averaging 8.2 LVAs, 6.5 LCVs, and 4.7 veins per patient. A total of 33 LVAs were performed with 27 LCVs with no ICG enhancement from 7 patients (Group D). These patients were satisfied with their lymphedema improvements. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic flow-positive but non-ICG enhanced LCVs, should also be considered as functional, thereby maximizing the number of functional LCVs for LVA.

The First Hand Allotransplantation in Taiwan: A Report at 9 Months.

PURPOSE: Hand transplantations have been initiated and have been encouraged by promising results for more than 1 decade. The aim of this study was to present the first case of hand transplantation performed in Taiwan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On September 3, 2014, we transplanted the left distal forearm and hand of a brain-dead managed 37 years to a man aged 45 years who had traumatic amputation of the distal third of his right forearm 30 years ago. The total ischemic time during the transplantation was 6 hours and 45 minutes. Immunosuppression included anti-thymocyte globulins, and methylprednisolone (Solumedrol) was used for the induction. Maintenance therapy included systemic tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid [mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)], and prednisone. A combination of systemic (tacrolimus/MMF/prednisolone) and topical immunosuppressant cream (clobetasol and tacrolimus) was applied if acute rejection occurred. Follow-up included routine posttransplant laboratory tests, skin biopsies, intensive physiotherapy, and psychological support. RESULTS: The initial postoperative course was uneventful. No surgical complications were observed. Immunosuppression was well tolerated using tacrolimus, MMF, and prednisone, except for some immune-related complications. One episode of mild clinical and histological signs of cutaneous rejection was seen at 105 days after surgery. These signs disappeared after pulse therapy with Solumedrol and the topical application of immunosuppressive creams (tacrolimus and clobetasol). One infection episode occurred due to local cellulitis and axillary lymphadenopathy on day 140 and was successfully treated with antibiotics. The patient developed cytomegalovirus infection at 7 months that responded to medication. Intensive physiotherapy led to satisfactory progress in motor functioning. Sensory progress (Tinel sign) was good and reached the wrist by 3 months for the median and ulnar nerves, and could be felt in the finger tip by 9 months in response to deep pressure and light touch sensations. The patient has a lateral pinch that allows him to pick up and grip objects during daily living, although his muscle power is still insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Hand allotransplantation is technically feasible. Currently available immunosuppression methods seem to control vascularized composite tissue allotransplantation rejection. A combination of topical and systemic immunosuppressants is a useful method to prevent acute hand allotransplant rejection.

The role of meperidine in reduction of postanesthetic shivering and its possible impact on flap outcomes.

Postoperative vascular compromise is a common but critical complication requiring emergent re-exploration, and remains a chief cause of free flap failure. This study investigated the relationship between postanesthetic shivering (PAS) and the development of postoperative complications associated with free flap reconstruction. One hundred thirty-six patients who underwent head and neck cancer resection and free flap reconstruction were retrospectively enrolled. Fifteen patients were assigned to the PAS group, while the others were assigned to the non-PAS (NPAS) group. The odds ratios of acute re-exploration or total failure of the free flap in the PAS group was 3.5 and 14.9, respectively. The dose of meperidine was positively correlated with PAS prevention in our statistical ROC curve analysis. The minimum effective dose of meperidine for PAS prevention was 0.35 mg/kg with 75% sensitivity and 60% specificity. These findings indicate that an optimal dose of meperidine could prevent PAS, which is shown to be associated with a decrease in the incidence of the early post-surgical re-exploration rate of these free flaps related to circulatory compromise.

Target-controlled infusion vs. manually controlled infusion of propofol with alfentanil for bidirectional endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The best anesthesia methods for analgesia and sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy are still debated. The aim of this study was to compare the recovery time, clinical presentations, and satisfaction between target-controlled infusion (TCI) and manually controlled infusion (MCI) in same-day bidirectional endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy followed by colonoscopy). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 220 patients with American Society of Anesthesiology physical status 1 or 2 were enrolled and randomized into the TCI or MCI groups. The clinical presentations, vasoactive drug demand, propofol consumption, and adverse events were recorded for both groups peri-procedurally. The concentrations of propofol in the plasma (Cp) and at the site of drug effect (Ce) by computerized simulation were also monitored in both groups. Finally, the satisfaction of patients, endoscopists, and nurse anesthetists was assessed by questionnaire after the examinations. RESULTS: Compared with the MCI group, the TCI group had a faster recovery time (17.91 ± 7.72 minutes vs. 14.58 ± 8.55 minutes; P = 0.002), less moderate hypotension (7.37 ± 15.46 % vs. 1.82 ± 5.15 %; P < 0.001), and shorter period of bradypnea (13.81 ± 15.92 % vs. 9.18 ± 12.00 %; P = 0.013). In addition, the TCI group reduced the relative risk of moderate desaturation by 50 % compared with the MCI group (30.9 % vs. 15.5 %; 95 % confidence interval 1.191-3.360; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that TCI of propofol combined with alfentanil was associated with a faster recovery time, and better hemodynamic and respiratory stability than MCI in same-day bidirectional endoscopy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CGMH IRB Identifier 97-0969B.

A new formula to predict the size and insertion depth of cuffed nasotracheal tube in children receiving dental surgery: a retrospective study.

This retrospective study aimed to develop a new formula for selecting the appropriate size and determining the depth of the cuffed nasotracheal intubation (NTI) for a cuffed endotracheal tube (cETT) in pediatric patients undergoing dental surgery. In addition, the clinical data on cETT (i.e., the size and depth of insertion) was compared with those calculated with age-based formulas to evaluate their correlation. A total number of 684 patients who received NTI were enrolled (healthy group, n = 607; special-need group, n = 77). The ETT size used in real-world scenarios was smaller (i.e., about 0.5 and 0.94 mm) than the age-based formula, while the ETT depth was greater (i.e., about 1.5 cm) than the age-based formula in both groups. In the healthy group, age, gender, and body weight were identified as predictors of ETT size and depth through multiple linear regression analysis, while only age and body weight were predictors in the special-needs group. New formulas were developed based on these findings, with ETT size = 3.98 + 0.052 × age + 0.048 × gender (male = 1, female = 0) + 0.023 × body weight (kg) and ETT depth = 15.1 + 0.43 × age + 0.300 × gender (male = 1, female = 0) + 0.007 × body weight (kg). The new formula could be useful for both healthy and special-need pediatric populations undergoing dental procedures.

Analgesic Efficacy of Gabapentin and Pregabalin in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgeries: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis investigated the effect of oral gabapentinoids (i.e., pregabalin and gabapentin) on analgesic consumption (i.e., primary outcome) and pain relief (i.e., secondary outcome) in patients following bariatric surgery. Analysis of five eligible trials published between 2010 and 2019 including 363 participants receiving gabapentinoids revealed a significantly lower morphine consumption [mean difference (MD) = - 15.1 mg, p = 0.004; evidence certainty: low] and risk of nausea/vomiting [risk ratio (RR) = 0.49, p = 0.002; evidence certainty: high] at postoperative 6-24 h. There was also a lower pain score at postoperative 0-4 h (MD = - 1.41, p < 0.00001; evidence certainty: low) and 6-12 h (MD = - 0.9, p = 0.007; evidence certainty: low) compared with controls, while pain severity at postoperative 24 h was comparable between two groups. In summary, preoperative oral gabapentinoids optimized postoperative pain outcomes and reduced risk of nausea/vomiting following bariatric surgery.

Selection of Optimal Functional Lymphatic Vessel Cutoff Size in Supermicrosurgical Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis in Lower Extremity Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: Functional lymphatic vessels are essential for supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis. Theoretically, the larger the lymphatic vessel, the better the flow. However, large lymphatic vessels are not readily available. Since the introduction of lymphaticovenous anastomosis, no guidelines have been set as to how small a lymphatic vessel is still worthwhile for anastomosis. METHODS: In this longitudinal cohort study, unilateral lower limb lymphedema patients who underwent lymphaticovenous anastomosis between March of 2016 and January of 2019 were included. Demographic data and intraoperative findings including the number and size of lymphatic vessels were recorded. The cutoff size was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, based on the functional properties of lymphatic vessels. Clinical correlation was made with post-lymphaticovenous anastomosis volume measured by magnetic resonance volumetry. RESULTS: A total of 141 consecutive patients (124 women and 17 men) with a median age of 60.0 years (range, 56.7 to 61.2 years) were included. The cutoff size for a functional lymphatic vessel was determined to be 0.50 mm (i.e., lymphatic vessel0.5) from a total of 1048 lymphatic vessels. Significant differences were found between the number of lymphatic vessels0.5 anastomosed (zero to one, two to three, and greater than over equal to four lymphatic vessels0.5), the median post-lymphaticovenous anastomosis volume reduction (in milliliters) (p < 0.001), and the median percentage volume reduction (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Lymphatic vessel0.5 can be a valuable reference for lymphaticovenous anastomosis. Post-lymphaticovenous anastomosis outcome can be enhanced with the use of lymphatic vessel0.5 for anastomoses. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Risk Factors of Postoperative Vomiting in the Eye of "Real-World Evidence"-Modifiable and Clinical Setting-Dependent Risk Factors in Surgical Trauma Patients.

Numerous studies on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) have been carried out since the early days of contemporary surgery. The incidence of PONV has been greatly reduced in recent years and new drugs for PONV keep evolving in the market; however, a substantial number of patients are still under the threat of PONV. Female gender, non-smokers, a history of PONV/motion sickness, and postoperative opioid use are four well-recognized risk factors of PONV. Many potential risk factors reported in previous studies were not consistently presented as predictors for PONV. Two questions then arise; are risk factors clinical setting dependent and are risk factors modifiable? We attempted to answer the questions through a comprehensive review of perioperative records of surgical patients from the Trauma Department of our hospital. As nausea is subjective and no standard is applicable for its measurement, postoperative vomiting (POV) was used as an endpoint in this study. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to address the POV issue in surgical trauma patients. A total of 855 patients were enrolled in this study after excluding age below 20 years old, total intravenous anesthesia, desflurane anesthesia, or records with missing data. Our results showed that female gender (OR 4.89) is the strongest predicting factor, followed by a less potent predicting factor-more intraoperative opioid consumption (OR 1.07)-which favor more POV. More intraoperative crystalloid supply (OR 0.71) and a higher body weight (OR 0.9) favor less POV. Other potential risk factors did not reach statistical significance in this study as independent risk factors. Our results also showed that when the intraoperative crystalloid infusion rate is greater than 4 mL/kg/h (OR 0.20), it favors a lower rate of POV; when intraoperative opioid consumption is greater than 12 mg morphine equivalents, MME (OR 1.87), it favors a higher rate of POV. We concluded that dominance of any independent risk factor over other risk factors depends on how individual factors interact with the clinical setting. Some risk factors could be modified, and a cut-off value could be derived to facilitate a better plan for POV prevention.

Postoperative Vomiting Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is Associated with Intraoperative Fluid Administration: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Potential risk factors for postoperative vomiting (POV) are important for daily anesthesia practice. To identify the risk factors associated with POV we retrospectively reviewed 553 adult patients who underwent scheduled simple laparoscopic cholecystectomy under sevoflurane-based general anesthesia between January and December 2018. Patients who experienced POV were predominantly women, had lower body weight, and higher ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status. The POV group showed female sex predominance, lower body weight, and higher ASA physical status, with a significant difference when compared with the non-POV group. In univariate analysis, female sex and Apfel scores of 2, 3, and 4 were associated with a higher POV incidence. Age > 70 years, higher body weight, and ASA physical status III were associated with a lower POV incidence. In multivariate logistic regression, sex, age, Apfel score, and intraoperative crystalloid infusion rate were POV predictive factors. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed a negative association between the intraoperative crystalloid infusion rate and POV occurrence with an area under the curve of 0.73 (p = 0.001). The cutoff intraoperative crystalloid infusion rate was 2 mL/kg/h with 82% sensitivity and 49% specificity (≥2 mL/kg/h was associated with a lower POV incidence vs. <2 mL/kg/h (OR, 95% CI; 0.52 [0.33-0.83])). To decrease POV in these patients, identifying high-risk factors and an intraoperative crystalloid administration of ≥2 mL/kg/h should be considered in patients undergoing LC under sevoflurane-based general anesthesia.

Sevoflurane versus desflurane for early postoperative vomiting after general anesthesia in hospitalized adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at assessing the effects of two commonly used anesthetics in general anesthesia (GA), sevoflurane and desflurane, on early postoperative vomiting (POV) in hospitalized adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING: Early postoperative vomiting after GA. PATIENTS: A total of 266 adult patients receiving inpatient surgeries under GA maintained with sevoflurane or desflurane. INTERVENTIONS: We searched PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ScienceDirect, and Embase for eligible RCTs comparing postoperative outcomes following sevoflurane- or desflurane-maintained anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was early POV. Secondary outcomes included late POV, early and late postoperative nausea (PON), time to extubation, and emergence time. MAIN RESULTS: Eight trials were included. There was no significant difference in the risk of early POV (risk ratio [RR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-1.64, p = 0.91). No significant difference in early PON was observed (RR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.77-1.56; p = 0.62). Nevertheless, the incidence of late POV and late PON were significantly lower in the sevoflurane group than that in the desflurane group (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.94, p = 0.03; RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.84, p = 0.01, respectively). The extubation time was longer in the sevoflurane group than in the desflurane group (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.56, 95% CI 0.14-0.97, p = 0.009). The emergence time of patients in the sevoflurane group was longer than that in those receiving desflurane (SMD 0.76, 95% CI 0.1-1.42, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Desflurane had the same effects on early POV and early PON as sevoflurane. However, the association between late POV and late PON with desflurane was stronger than that with sevoflurane if the effects of opioids were not considered. The desflurane group had shorter time to extubation and emergence time than the sevoflurane group. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020218988.

The Use of Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine for Patients Receiving Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

The sedation outcomes associated with dexmedetomidine compared with those of propofol during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) remains unclear. Electronic databases (i.e., the Cochrane controlled trials register, Embase, Medline, and Scopus) were searched from inception to 25 December 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the sedation outcomes with dexmedetomidine or propofol in adult patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) receiving DISE. The primary outcome was the difference in minimum oxygen saturation (mSaO2). Five RCTs (270 participants) published between 2015 and 2020 were included for analysis. Compared with dexmedetomidine, propofol was associated with lower levels of mSaO2 (mean difference (MD) = -7.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) -12.04 to -2.44; 230 participants) and satisfaction among endoscopic performers (standardized MD = -2.43, 95% CI -3.61 to -1.26; 128 participants) as well as a higher risk of hypoxemia (relative ratios = 1.82, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.76; 82 participants). However, propofol provided a shorter time to fall asleep and a lower risk of failed sedation compared with dexmedetomidine. No significant difference was found in other outcomes. Compared with propofol, dexmedetomidine exhibited fewer adverse effects on respiratory function and provided a higher level of satisfaction among endoscopic performers but was associated with an elevated risk of failed sedation.

A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the impact of oral vitamin C supplementation on first-year outcomes in orthopedic patients.

This meta-analysis aimed at investigating the impact of oral vitamin C supplementation on the post-procedural recovery of orthopedic patients, including functional outcomes and complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I). Literature search using the Medline, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception till March 2021 identified seven eligible randomized controlled trials with 1,361 participants. Forest plot revealed no significant difference in the functional outcomes at 6-12 months [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.00, 95% CI - 0.19 to 0.18, 467 patients], risk of overall complications (RR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.39, 426 patients), and pain severity at 3-6 months (SMD = - 0.18, 95% CI - 0.49 to 0.12, 486 patients) between patients with and without oral vitamin C supplementation. Pooled analysis showed that vitamin C treatment reduced the risk of CRPS I regardless of dosage (RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.85, 1143 patients). In conclusion, the current meta-analysis demonstrated that oral vitamin C supplementation may reduce the risk of complex regional pain syndrome type I but did not improve the functional outcomes in orthopedic patients. Nevertheless, because of the small number of trials included in the present study, further large-scale clinical studies are warranted to support our findings.

Association of pharmacological prophylaxis with the risk of pediatric emergence delirium after sevoflurane anesthesia: An updated network meta-analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This updated network meta-analysis aims at exploring whether the concurrent use of midazolam or antiemetics may enhance the efficacy of other pharmacological regimens for delirium prophylaxis in pediatric population after general anesthesia (GA). DESIGN: Network meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42020179483). SETTING: Postoperative recovery area. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients undergoing GA with sevoflurane. INTERVENTIONS: Pharmacological interventions applied during GA with sevoflurane. MEASUREMENTS: This network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted with a frequentist model. PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalKey, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception dates to April 12, 2020, for RCTs of either placebo-controlled or active-controlled design containing information on the incidence of emergence delirium in pediatric patients undergoing sevoflurane anesthesia. MAIN RESULTS: Seventy studies comprising 6904 participants were included for the analysis of 30 pharmacological interventions. Based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis, midazolam was ranked the lowest in therapeutic effect (SUCRA: 20%), while antiemetics as a monotherapy had no effect on delirium prophylaxis. However, there was a trend that most combination therapies with midazolam or antiemetics were superior to monotherapies for delirium prophylaxis. Subgroup analyses based on age (i.e., ≤7 years) and a validated scoring system (i.e., the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale) for delirium also suggested a better efficacy of combination therapies than monotherapies. Overall, combination therapies with midazolam or antiemetics did not have a negative impact on the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit, or time to extubation. The dexmedetomidine-midazolam-antiemetic combination was the most effective strategy for the prevention of emergence delirium. CONCLUSIONS: This network meta-analysis suggested that the incorporation of midazolam or antiemetics as adjuncts for combination therapies may have synergistic effects against pediatric postoperative emergence delirium. Future large-scale placebo-controlled RCTs are warranted to validate our findings.

Determining factors in relation to lymphovascular characteristics and anastomotic configuration in supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis - A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) can be performed in different configuration such as end-to-end (LVEEA), end-to-side (LVESA), and side-to-end (LVSEA). Each configuration has its own advantages and disadvantages. However, it has remained ambiguous as to which anastomotic o configuration to choose. The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the relative sizes of lymphatic vessel (LV) and recipient vein (RV), in attempts to provide the basis for proper selections of the anastomotic configuration. METHODS: From March 2016 to October 2018, 100 lymphedema patients with 103 lymphedematous lower limbs (stage I-III) were included. All patients underwent supermicrosurgical LVA. Demographic data and intraoperative findings, including the number and size of the LV/RV, the size discrepancies, and the numbers of LVA performed were recorded. The severity of LVs were classified based on the lymphosclerosis classification (s0, s1, s2, and s3). One-way ANOVA test and post hoc analysis with Bonferroni's correction were performed for size discrepancy analysis. RESULTS: A total 730 LVA were performed with 621 LVs and 468 RVs, averaging 7.1 LVA per limb. Of these, 367 (50.3%) were LVEEA, 333 (45.6%) were LVESA, and 30 (4.1%) were LVSEA. The average LV and RV size was 0.61 ± 0.35 mm and 0.87 ± 0.43 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). The average LV size in different configuration: LVEEA = LVESA < LVSEA (p < 0.001); The average RV size: LVEEA = LVSEA < LVESA (p < 0.001); The size discrepancy: LVESA > LVSEA > LVEEA (p < 0.001).The LVSEA group has more s1 lymphatic vessels as opposed to LVEEA and LVESA (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The size and the comparative discrepancy between the LVs and RVs are the determining factors for proper anastomotic configuration selection during LVA. LVESA was more frequently performed when vessel size discrepancy was larger. The efficacy of each anastomotic configuration has yet to be determined.

Supermicrosurgical Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis as Alternative Treatment Option for Moderate-to-Severe Lower Limb Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) alleviates lymphedema by draining stagnant lymph from the lymphatic vessels into the venous system. Nevertheless, LVA is believed to be unsuitable for treating moderate-to-severe lymphedema presenting diffuse-pattern dermal backflow (DB). Dermal backflow is considered to be the sign of superficial lymphatic functional failure that renders LVA ineffective. Based on a current algorithm, a more invasive vascularized lymph node flap transfer is recommended instead of LVA. This retrospective study aimed to further investigate and possibly challenge this concept. STUDY DESIGN: One-hundred patients with unilateral lymphedematous lower limbs who underwent LVA were included. Patients were divided into Group I (10 patients with mild lymphedema) and Group II (90 patients with moderate-to-severe lymphedema). Demographic data and intraoperative findings were recorded. The post-LVA volume reductions by magnetic resonance volumetry were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Preoperatively, significant differences were found in BMI (20.6 vs 26.0 kg/m2, p = 0.004) and the volume gained in the lymphedematous limb (396.8 mL vs 1,056.8 mL, p = 0.005) between Groups I and II. Postoperatively, a significant median post-LVA volume reduction (-282.0 mL vs -763.5 mL, p = 0.022) was found in Group II. However, there were no differences in the percentages of post-LVA volume reduction (-43.8% vs -36.4%, p = 0.793) in Groups I and II. CONCLUSIONS: The use of supermicrosurgical LVA is as effective at treating moderate-to-severe lymphedema as milder lymphedema. The indication for LVA should be broadened to include such cases.