Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Emerg Med ; 60(1): 107-111, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33160823

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infantile hepatic hemangioma (IHH) is a rare but life-threatening disorder that must be considered in the newborn presenting with high-output heart failure (HF). IHH is a tumor comprised of large vascular beds, which require a significant increase in blood flow as the lesion grows. This, in turn, creates an undue burden on the cardiovascular system, leading to high-output HF and potentially, respiratory distress. Recent changes have been made in the classification of certain hepatic hemangiomas and their treatments. CASE REPORT: A 10-day-old girl presented to the Emergency Department with increased respiratory effort and an episode of apnea and cyanosis. A chest x-ray study was obtained and showed cardiomegaly and pulmonary edema concerning for HF. The patient was promptly admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit, where advanced imaging was obtained revealing findings consistent with IHH. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: HF in an infant is a critical condition often requiring prompt intervention and rapid diagnosis of the correct etiology to save a life. IHH is an example of an extrathoracic etiology of pediatric HF that has undergone recent changes in terminology and diagnosis. Increased awareness among emergency physicians of this disease process and its treatments can lead to expeditious diagnosis and treatment of this potentially life-threatening illness.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Hemangioma , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Criança , Dispneia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Hemangioma/complicações , Hemangioma/diagnóstico , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36505944

RESUMO

Objective: We examined the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections in an urgent-care setting. Design: Retrospective database review. Setting: The study was conducted in 2 urgent-care clinics staffed by academic emergency physicians in San Diego, California. Patients: Visits for acute respiratory infections were identified based on presenting complaints. Methods: The primary outcome was a discharge prescription for an antibiotic. The patient and provider characteristics that predicted this outcome were analyzed using logistic regression. The variation in antibiotic prescriptions between providers was also analyzed. Results: In total, 15,160 visits were analyzed. The patient characteristics were not predictive of antibiotic treatment. Physicians were more likely than advanced practice practitioners to prescribe antibiotics (1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.42). For every year of seniority, a provider was 1.03 (95% CI, 1.02-1.03) more likely to prescribe an antibiotic. Although the providers saw similar patients, we detected significant variation in the antibiotic prescription rate between providers: the mean antibiotic prescription rate within the top quartile was 54.3% and the mean rate in the bottom quartile was 21.7%. Conclusions: The patient and provider characteristics we examined were either not predictive or were only weakly predictive of receiving an antibiotic prescription for acute respiratory infection. However, we detected a marked variation between providers in the rate of antibiotic prescription. Provider differences, not patient differences, drive variations in antibiotic prescriptions. Stewardship efforts may be more effective if directed at providers rather than patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA