The impact of physical fitness on resilience to modern life stress and the mediating role of general self-efficacy.

Substantial evidence shows that physical activity and fitness play a protective role in the development of stress related disorders. However, the beneficial effects of fitness for resilience to modern life stress are not fully understood. Potentially protective effects may be attributed to enhanced resilience via underlying psychosocial mechanisms such as self-efficacy expectations. This study investigated whether physical activity and fitness contribute to prospectively measured resilience and examined the mediating effect of general self-efficacy. 431 initially healthy adults participated in fitness assessments as part of a longitudinal-prospective study, designed to identify mechanisms of resilience. Self-efficacy and habitual activity were assessed in parallel to cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, which were determined by a submaximal step-test, hand strength and standing long jump test. Resilience was indexed by stressor reactivity: mental health problems in relation to reported life events and daily hassles, monitored quarterly for nine months. Hierarchical linear regression models and bootstrapped mediation analyses were applied. We could show that muscular and self-perceived fitness were positively associated with stress resilience. Extending this finding, the muscular fitness-resilience relationship was partly mediated by self-efficacy expectations. In this context, self-efficacy expectations may act as one underlying psychological mechanism, with complementary benefits for the promotion of mental health. While physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness did not predict resilience prospectively, we found muscular and self-perceived fitness to be significant prognostic parameters for stress resilience. Although there is still more need to identify specific fitness parameters in light of stress resilience, our study underscores the general relevance of fitness for stress-related disorders prevention.

Longitudinal determination of resilience in humans to identify mechanisms of resilience to modern-life stressors: the longitudinal resilience assessment (LORA) study.

Resilience is the maintenance and/or quick recovery of mental health during and after periods of adversity. It is conceptualized to result from a dynamic process of successful adaptation to stressors. Up to now, a large number of resilience factors have been proposed, but the mechanisms underlying resilience are not yet understood. To shed light on the complex and time-varying processes of resilience that lead to a positive long-term outcome in the face of adversity, the Longitudinal Resilience Assessment (LORA) study has been established. In this study, 1191 healthy participants are followed up at 3- and 18-month intervals over a course of 4.5 years at two study centers in Germany. Baseline and 18-month visits entail multimodal phenotyping, including the assessment of mental health status, sociodemographic and lifestyle variables, resilience factors, life history, neuropsychological assessments (of proposed resilience mechanisms), and biomaterials (blood for genetic and epigenetic, stool for microbiome, and hair for cortisol analysis). At 3-monthly online assessments, subjects are monitored for subsequent exposure to stressors as well as mental health measures, which allows for a quantitative assessment of stressor-dependent changes in mental health as the main outcome. Descriptive analyses of mental health, number of stressors including major life events, daily hassles, perceived stress, and the ability to recover from stress are here presented for the baseline sample. The LORA study is unique in its design and will pave the way for a better understanding of resilience mechanisms in humans and for further development of interventions to successfully prevent stress-related disorder.

[Internet-based resilience training and prevention of mental disorders]. / Internetbasierte Resilienzförderung und Prävention psychischer Erkrankungen.

BACKGROUND: Resilience is associated with a positive and resource-oriented perspective. Therefore, it seems especially attractive for health promotion and prevention. In recent years, interventions to foster resilience have been increasingly developed, which train resilience factors and are mainly conducted in a face to face group format. OBJECTIVE: The question is raised what potential internet-based interventions (i-interventions) that train resilience factors have for health promotion and prevention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on a narrative overview, the possibilities for i­interventions that train resilience factors for health promotion and prevention are investigated and the state of research is described. RESULTS: The effects of the i­interventions presented here, which aim at fostering resilience, on measures of mental health and well-being are heterogeneous and vary between low to high effects. Stronger evidence for the efficacy of these measures exists for more general i­interventions that also train resilience factors but are conceptualized for the prevention of specific disorders, such as depression or for stress reduction. DISCUSSION: Given the heterogeneous nature of intervention contents, theoretical foundations and therapeutic methods used, the heterogeneity of the evidence is discussed. In addition, perspectives for the further development of resource-oriented resilience interventions are outlined.

Effects of suboptimal or excessive gestational weight gain on childhood overweight and abdominal adiposity: results from a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Defining prenatal modifiable risk factors of childhood overweight and obesity has become critical as the need of primary preventive strategies increases. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the interrelationship between inadequate or excessive gestational weight gain (GWG), according to maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI)-specific Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations, and childhood overweight and abdominal adiposity. DESIGN: In a retrospective cohort study in Germany, data of 6837 mother-child dyads were obtained from medical records, a questionnaire and by anthropometric measurements of children at school entry. Main exposure was GWG as categorized by the 2009 IOM guidelines and as a continuous variable. Outcome measures were children's overweight and abdominal adiposity defined as ≥ 90 th age- and sex-specific percentiles for BMI and waist circumference, respectively. RESULTS: During pregnancy, more than half of mothers (53.6%) had gained weight excessively. Among the children (mean age: 5.8 years), 10.5% were overweight and 15.1% had abdominal adiposity. A nonlinear relationship between absolute GWG and the risk of offspring overweight and abdominal adiposity was observed. An increased risk of childhood overweight was related to excessive compared with recommended GWG, after adjustment for potential confounders (odds ratio (OR): 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30, 1.91), but not to inadequate GWG. Similar results were obtained for the risk of childhood abdominal adiposity by excessive GWG (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.63); there was no association with inadequate GWG. Analyses stratified by maternal prepregnancy BMI category did not suggest effect modification. CONCLUSION: Exceeding the recommended BMI-specific IOM GWG ranges has an adverse impact on the risk of childhood overweight and abdominal adiposity, whereas suboptimal GWG conveys no benefit or risk, reflecting a nonlinear relationship between absolute GWG and the risk of childhood overweight and adiposity. Strategies focussing on the awareness and prevention of excessive GWG and its consequences are justified.

Gestational diabetes predicts the risk of childhood overweight and abdominal circumference independent of maternal obesity.

AIM: Gestational diabetes mellitus is believed to be a risk factor for childhood overweight/obesity. We aimed to assess whether this association is either a reflection or independent of confounding by maternal BMI. METHODS: Data from 7355 mother-child dyads of the German Perinatal Prevention of Obesity cohort with full anthropometric information on mothers and children, gestational diabetes and confounding factors were obtained at school entry health examination. We calculated crude and adjusted logistic regression models for the association of gestational diabetes and childhood overweight/obesity and abdominal adiposity defined by age- and sex-specific percentiles for BMI and waist circumference. RESULTS: Among all children (mean age 5.8 years), 8.1% were overweight, 2.6% were obese and 15.5% had abdominal adiposity. The prevalence of overweight (obesity) was 21% (8.2%) in children of mothers with gestational diabetes and 10.4% (2.4%) in children of healthy mothers. Analyses with adjustment for maternal BMI and other potential confounders yielded an odds ratio of 1.81 (95% CI 1.23-2.65) and 2.80 (95% CI 1.58-4.99) for the impact of gestational diabetes on childhood overweight and obesity, respectively. Similar results were obtained for the risk of childhood abdominal adiposity (odds ratio 1.64, 95% CI 1.16-2.33) by maternal gestational diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The postulated increased risk of overweight and abdominal adiposity in offspring of mothers with gestational diabetes cannot be explained by maternal BMI alone and may be stronger for childhood obesity than for overweight.

Different age-specific incidence and remission rates in pre-school and primary school suggest need for targeted obesity prevention in childhood.

BACKGROUND: School entry marks a tremendous change in the children's life style, which might well be relevant for the emergence of overweight. Previous studies suggested a dramatic increase in the prevalence of overweight during this age. OBJECTIVE: To compare the age-specific balance between the incidence and remission of overweight between pre-school and primary school age children. DESIGN: We combined the data of three studies that had been conducted within the setting of the compulsory school entry health examination in different parts of Germany: one covering retrospective cohort data from age 2 to school entry (n=5045), one prospective data from school entry to fourth grade (n=1235) and one comprising both (n=1194). We assessed the rates of incidence and remission of overweight and obesity from age 2 to school entry and from school entry to fourth grade. RESULTS: In pre-school age, the pooled incidence for overweight was 8.2% (95% confidence interval: 7.5, 8.9) compared with a remission rate of 62.6% (58.4, 66.7), yielding a prevalence at school entry of 10.7% (9.9, 11.5). In primary school age, the pooled incidence for overweight increased to 14.6% (13.1, 16.1), whereas the remission rate was reduced to 17.7% (13.8, 22.3), yielding a prevalence of 23.7% (22.0, 25.4) in fourth grade. A similar pattern was observed for obesity. CONCLUSIONS: While high remission rates balance incident overweight in pre-school years, the dramatic increase in the prevalence of overweight and obesity in primary school years reflects a higher incidence and even more a lower remission rate. Obesity prevention programs in primary school age are mandatory and need to address primary and secondary prevention elements.

Intervention studies to foster resilience - A systematic review and proposal for a resilience framework in future intervention studies.

Psychological resilience refers to the phenomenon that many people are able to adapt to the challenges of life and maintain mental health despite exposure to adversity. This has stimulated research on training programs to foster psychological resilience. We evaluated concepts, methods and designs of 43 randomized controlled trials published between 1979 and 2014 which assessed the efficacy of such training programs and propose standards for future intervention research based on recent developments in the field. We found that concepts, methods and designs in current resilience intervention studies are of limited use to properly assess efficacy of interventions to foster resilience. Major problems are the use of definitions of resilience as trait or a composite of resilience factors, the use of unsuited assessment instruments, and inappropriate study designs. To overcome these challenges, we propose 1) an outcome-oriented definition of resilience, 2) an outcome-oriented assessment of resilience as change in mental health in relation to stressor load, and 3) methodological standards for suitable study designs of future intervention studies. Our proposals may contribute to an improved quality of resilience intervention studies and may stimulate further progress in this growing research field.