Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III gastric adenocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Whether adjuvant chemotherapy should be different for patients with stage II and III gastric cancer is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on the outcomes of 140 and 256 patients with stage II and III gastric cancer, respectively, between January 2008 and December 2018. Chemotherapies were stratified as fluoropyrimidine plus platinum versus fluoropyrimidine alone, tegafur/gimeracil/octeracil (S-1)-containing versus non-S-1-containing regimens, and S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 67.0 (range 24.6-98.8) years. With a median follow-up of 105 months, recurrence occurred in 32 (22.9%) and 130 (50.8%) patients with stage II and III disease, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered as fluoropyrimidine monotherapy to 68 (48.6%) and 73 (28.5%) patients, fluoropyrimidine plus platinum to 9 (6.4%) and 104 (40.6%) patients, and none to 63 (45.0%) and 79 (30.9%) patients with stage II and III gastric cancer, respectively. Doublet chemotherapy was associated with longer disease-free survival (DFS) (26.5 vs. 15.2 months, P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (41.2 vs. 22.0 months, P < 0.001) than fluoropyrimidine monotherapy for stage IIIB-IIIC disease. Furthermore, S-1-containing regimens prolonged DFS (57.4 vs. 21.9 months, P = 0.044) and OS (81.4 vs. 28.6 months, P = 0.023) compared with non-S-1-containing chemotherapy in stage III disease. CONCLUSION: Although fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is feasible for stage II-IIIA disease, doublet chemotherapy is significantly associated with longer survival than monotherapy for stage IIIB-IIIC disease. S-1-containing regimens might lead to longer survival than non-S-1-containing chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer.

The effect of joint involvement of nurse and physician in hospice care on terminal cancer patients on do-not-resuscitate orders signed by surrogates.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with terminal cancer often experience physical and mental distress. Signing a do-not-resuscitate order (DNR) is crucial to protect against invalid treatment. This study aims to explore the effect of hospice shared care intervention by medical staff on the completion of a DNR-S (DNR order signed by surrogates) for patients with terminal cancer. METHOD: The cross-sectional study in this research involved secondary analysis of data from the 2011-2015 clinical cancer case management database of a medical center in central Taiwan. Those with a DNR order signed by patients (DNR-P) or DNR-S before the hospice shared care consultation were excluded from this study; a total of 1,306 patients with terminal cancer were selected. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that the percentage of DNR-S after consultation involving both nurse and physician was 75.4%. With other variables controlled, the number of DNR-Ss after consultation with a nurse was significantly lower [odds ratio (OR) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.42-0.75] and that of DNR-Ss after consultation involving both nurse and physician was significantly higher (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.01-1.79), than that of DNR-Ss after consultation with only the physician. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Joint involvement of the nurse and physician in hospice care provides sufficient information to patients and family with terminal cancer about their condition and enhances doctor-patient communication. This effectively assists patients with terminal cancer and their family members in making the major decision of signing a DNR, alleviates the concerns of patients and family members about signing a DNR, and reduces terminal cancer patients' pain at the end of life to ensure that they die in peace and dignity.

A New Learning Approach to Improve Nurses' Knowledge of and Skills in Diabetes Care.

BACKGROUND: Patients' knowledge of how to care for their diabetes mellitus (DM) is critically influenced by health education, which is mostly provided by nurses. Therefore, effectively increasing nurses' knowledge of and skills in diabetes care is crucial. The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of the Diabetes Conversation Map™ Program (DCMP) in improving nurses' knowledge of DM care and skills in insulin injection. METHOD: A quasi-experimental design was adopted that used a pre-test and a posttest. A total of 18 nurses were included in the intervention group, while 19 nurses were in the control group receiving conventional teaching. A structured questionnaire regarding knowledge of and skills in DM care was administered before the program and then one month after. RESULTS: Knowledge of DM and skills in insulin injection improved significantly in the intervention group compared to the control group (p < .001 vs. p < .01). CONCLUSION: The DCMP can be used to increase nurses' knowledge of DM and their skills in caring for DM. It leads to more effective learning than conventional teaching. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2022;53(2):90-96.].

Effectiveness of Multimedia-Based Learning on the Improvement of Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavioral Intention toward COVID-19 Prevention among Nurse Aides in Taiwan: A Parallel-Interventional Study.

Because nurse aides are one of the first-line care providers in hospitals, they should possess better knowledge, attitude, and behavioral intention toward COVID-19 during the pandemic. This study aimed to compare the improvements of COVID-19-related education on learning outcomes between multimedia-based and traditional face-to-face learning models for nurse aides. The parallel-group randomized controlled trial recruited 74 participants in both the experimental and control groups. Two 90 min interventions with the same contents, but in different ways, were delivered. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data of demographic information, knowledge, attitude, and behavioral intention toward COVID-19 before and after the interventions. Results from generalized estimation equations analysis indicated that the nurse aides in the multimedia-based learning group had greater improvement in the scores of knowledge (difference in change: 3.2, standard error: 0.97, p < 0.001), attitude (difference in change: 10.2, standard error: 2.97, p < 0.001), and behavioral intention (difference in change: 0.5, standard error: 0.04, p < 0.001) than those in the face-to-face learning group. During the outbreak of COVID-19, multimedia-based learning as an effective learning method could improve the learning outcomes related to COVID-19 and achieve learning goals without close contact.