The prognostic role of advanced hemodynamic variables in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: Invasive hemodynamic variables obtained from right heart catheterization have been used for risk-stratifying patients with advanced heart failure (HF). However, there is a paucity of data on the prognostic value of invasive hemodynamic variables in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). We hypothesized that cardiac power output (CPO), cardiac power efficiency (CPE), and left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) can serve as prognostic markers in patients with LVADs. METHODS: Baseline hemodynamic data from patients who had LVAD ramp studies at our institution from 4/2014 to 7/2018 were prospectively collected, from which advanced hemodynamic variables (CPO, CPE, and LVSWI) were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed for hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAE), HF admissions, and mortality. RESULTS: Ninety-one participants (age 61 ± 11 years, 34% women, 40% Black or African American, and 38% ischemic cardiomyopathy) were analyzed. Low CPE was significantly associated with mortality (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.02-5.74, p = 0.045) in univariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.04). Low LVSWI was significantly associated with mortality (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.09-4.17, p = 0.03) in univariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.02). CPO was not associated with mortality. CPO, CPE, and LVSWI were not associated with HRAE or HF admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced hemodynamic variables can serve as prognostic indicators for patients with LVADs. Low CPE and LVSWI are prognostic for higher mortality, but no variables were associated with HF admissions or HRAEs.

Postoperative tolvaptan use in left ventricular assist device patients: The TOLVAD randomized pilot study.

PURPOSE: Tolvaptan, a selective vasopressin type-2 antagonist, has been shown to increase serum sodium (Na) and urine output in hyponatremic left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients in retrospective studies. In this prospective randomized pilot study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of tolvaptan in this population. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, non-blinded pilot study of LVAD recipients with post-operative hyponatremia (Na < 135 mEq/L) (NCT05408104). Eligible participants were randomized to receive tolvaptan 15 mg daily in addition to usual care versus usual care alone. The primary outcome was a change in Na level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), from the first post-operative day of hyponatremia (the day of randomization) to discharge. RESULTS: A total of 33 participants were enrolled, and 28 underwent randomization (median age 55 [IQR 50-62]), 21% women, 54% Black, 32% ischemic cardiomyopathy, median baseline Na 135 (IQR 134-138). Fifteen participants were randomized to tolvaptan (TLV) and 13 were randomized to usual care alone (No-TLV). Mean change in Na from randomization to discharge in the TLV group was 2.7 mEq/L (95%CI 0.7-4.7, p = 0.013) and 1.8 (95%CI 0.5-4.0, p = 0.11) in the No-TLV group, though baseline and final Na levels were similar between groups. The mean change in eGFR was 2.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95%CI 10.1-15.3, p = 0.59) in TLV versus 7.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95%CI 5.2-20.2, p = 0.15) in No-TLV. TLV participants had significantly more urine output than No-TLV patients during their first 24 h after randomization (3294 vs 2155 ml, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: TLV significantly increases urine output, with nominal improvement in Na level, in hyponatremic post-operative LVAD patients without adversely impacting renal function.

Aortic Pulsatility Index: A Novel Hemodynamic Variable for Evaluation of Decompensated Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Right heart catheterization for invasive hemodynamics has shown only modest correlation with clinical outcomes. We designed a novel hemodynamic variable that incorporates ventricular output and filling pressure. We anticipated that the aortic pulsatility index (API) would correlate with clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients undergoing right heart catheterization with milrinone drug study at our institution (February 2013 to November 2019). The API was calculated as (systolic blood pressure - diastolic blood pressure)/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. The primary outcome was freedom from advanced therapies, defined as the need for inotropes, temporary mechanical circulatory support, a left ventricular assist device, or orthotopic heart transplantation, or death at 30 days. A total of 224 patient encounters, age 57 years (48-66 years; 34% women; 31% ischemic cardiomyopathy) were included. In univariable analysis, lower baseline API was significantly associated with progression to advanced therapies or death at 30-days (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.61; P < .001) compared with those on continued medical management. Receiver operator characteristic analysis specified an optimal cutpoint of 1.45 for API. A Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated an association of API with the primary outcome (79% for API ≥ 1.45 vs 48% for API < 1.45). In multivariable analysis, higher API was strongly associated with freedom from advanced therapies or death (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.65, P ≤ .001), even when adjusted for baseline characteristics and routine right heart catheterization measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The API is a novel invasive hemodynamic measurement that is associated independently with freedom from advanced therapies or death at 30-day follow-up.

New-Onset Neurosarcoidosis Following Heart Transplant for Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

A 63-year-old woman who underwent heart transplantation for cardiac sarcoidosis developed new headache and vision changes. Extensive workup resulted in a diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis treated with pulse dose steroids and infliximab. Recurrence of sarcoidosis after transplantation for isolated cardiac sarcoidosis occurs, but optimal surveillance methods remain unknown.

The Seattle Heart Failure Model in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality following kidney transplantation. Heart failure affects 17-21% of patients with chronic kidney disease and increases along with time receiving dialysis. The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) is a validated mortality risk model for heart failure patients that incorporates clinical, therapeutic, and laboratory parameters but does not include measures of kidney function. We applied the SHFM to patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who were being evaluated for kidney transplantation to determine if the model was associated with post-transplant mortality. This retrospective single-center study analyzed survival among 360 adult deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients. Cox regression was used to model post-transplant patient survival. Our findings indicated that a 1.0-point increase in the adapted SHFM score was significantly associated with post-transplant mortality (HR 1.76, 95% CI = 1.10-2.83, p = 0.02), independently of the Kidney Donor Profile Index and Estimated Post-Transplant Survival. Individual covariates of the SHFM were evaluated in univariate analyses, and age, sodium, cholesterol, and lymphocyte count were significantly related to mortality. This study provides preliminary evidence that an adapted SHFM score could be a useful tool in evaluating mortality risk post-transplant in patients with ESRD.

Aortic pulsatility index predicts clinical outcomes in heart failure: a sub-analysis of the ESCAPE trial.

AIMS: Aortic pulsatility index (API), calculated as (systolic-diastolic blood pressure)/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), is a novel haemodynamic measurement representing both cardiac filling pressures and contractility. We hypothesized that API would better predict clinical outcomes than traditional haemodynamic metrics of cardiac function. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) trial individual-level data were used. Routine haemodynamic measurements, including Fick cardiac index (CI), and the advanced haemodynamic metrics of API, cardiac power output (CPO), and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPI) were calculated after final haemodynamic-monitored optimization. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death or need for orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) at 6 months. A total of 433 participants were enrolled in the ESCAPE trial of which 145 had final haemodynamic data. Final API measurements predicted the primary outcome, OR 0.47 (95% CI 0.32-0.70, P < 0.001), while CI, CPO, and PAPI did not. Receiver operator characteristic analyses of final advanced haemodynamic measurements indicated API best predicted the primary outcome with a cutoff of 2.9 (sensitivity 76.2%, specificity 55.3%, correctly classified 61.4%, area-under-the-curve 0.71), compared with CPO, CI, and PAPI. Kaplan-Meier analyses indicated API ≥ 2.9 was associated with greater freedom from the primary outcome (83.5%), compared with API < 2.9 (58.4%), P = 0.001. While PAPI was also significantly associated, CI and CPO were not. CONCLUSIONS: The novel haemodynamic measurement API better predicted clinical outcomes in the ESCAPE trial when compared with traditional invasive haemodynamic metrics of cardiac function.

Biventricular Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients Supported With LVAD.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the effects of right ventricular (RV) pacing versus biventricular (BiV) pacing on quality of life, functional status, and arrhythmias in LVAD patients. BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) independently improve outcomes in heart failure patients, but the effects of combining these therapies remains unknown. We present the first prospective randomized study evaluating the effects of RV versus BiV pacing on quality of life, functional status, and arrhythmias in LVAD patients. METHODS: In this prospective randomized crossover study, LVAD patients with prior CRT devices were alternated on RV and BiV pacing for planned 7-14-day periods. Ambulatory step count, 6-minute walk test distance, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, arrhythmia burden, CRT lead function, and echocardiographic data were collected with each pacing mode. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled, with a median age of 65 years, 67% male, and mean duration of LVAD support of 309 days. Compared with BiV pacing, RV-only pacing resulted in 29% higher mean daily step count, 11% higher 6-minute walk test distance, and 7% improved KCCQ-12 score (all p < 0.03). LV end-diastolic volume was significantly lower with RV pacing (220 vs. 250 mL; p = 0.03). Fewer patients had ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes during RV pacing (p = 0.03). RV lead impedance was lower with RV pacing (p = 0.047), but no significant differences were observed in impedance across other CRT leads. CONCLUSIONS: In the first prospective randomized study comparing variable pacing in LVAD patients, RV pacing was associated with significantly improved functional status, quality of life, fewer ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and stable lead impedance compared with BiV pacing. This study supports turning off LV lead pacing in LVAD patients with CRT.