Community organizing network for environmental health: using a community health development approach to increase community capacity around reduction of environmental triggers.

The Community Organizing Network for Environmental Health (CONEH), a project of Community Action Against Asthma, used a community health development approach to improve children's asthma-related health through increasing the community's capacity to reduce physical and social environmental triggers for asthma. Three community organizers were hired to work with community groups and residents in neighborhoods in Detroit on the priority areas of air quality, housing, and citizen involvement in the environmental project and policy decision-making. As part of the evaluation of the CONEH project, 20 one-on-one semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted between August and November 2005 involving steering committee members, staff members, and key community organization staff and/or community members. Using data from the evaluation of the CONEH project, this article identifies the dimensions of community capacity that were enhanced as part of a CBPR community health development approach to reducing physical and social environmental triggers associated with childhood asthma and the factors that facilitated or inhibited the enhancement of community capacity.

Symptom experience and quality of life of women following breast cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the correlates of breast cancer-related symptoms that persist posttreatment and determined the relationship between symptoms and quality of life (QOL). METHODS: A population-based sample of women in the United States with stage 0-II breast cancer (n = 1372) completed a survey including the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire and the Breast Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Described are the presence and frequency of 13 symptom scales and their associations with 10 QOL dimensions. RESULTS: All study participants had completed primary treatment (surgery and radiation and/or chemotherapy, if applicable). Mean time from initial surgical treatment to completion of the questionnaire was 7.2 months (range 0.5-14.9 months). Mean number of symptoms reported was 6.8, with the 5 most common symptom scales being systemic therapy side effects (87.7%), fatigue (81.7%), breast symptoms (72.1%), sleep disturbance (57.1%), and arm symptoms (55.6%). Younger age and poorer health status at diagnosis were associated with worse symptoms. Fatigue had the greatest impact on QOL, with significant differences between those with high and low fatigue across 7 QOL dimensions. Sociodemographic, prior health status, clinical, and treatment/diagnostic factors explained only 9%-27% of the variance in QOL outcomes. Adding symptom experience increased the variance explained to 18%-60%. CONCLUSIONS: More attention to the reduction and management of disease and treatment-related symptoms could improve QOL among women with breast cancer.

Breast cancer survivorship program: testing for cross-cultural relevance.

Taking CHARGE, a theory-based self-management program, was developed to assist women with survivorship concerns that arise after breast cancer treatment. Few such programs have been evaluated for cultural relevance with diverse groups. This study determined the utility and cultural relevance of the program for African American (AA) breast cancer survivors. Two focus groups were held with AA women (n = 13), aged 41 to 72 years, who had completed primary treatment. Focus group participants assessed the program content, format, materials, and the self-regulation process. Content analysis of audiotapes was conducted using an open, focused coding process to identify emergent themes regarding program relevance and topics requiring enhancement and/or further emphasis. Although findings indicated that the program's content was relevant to participants' experiences, AA women identified need for cultural enhancements in spirituality, self-preservation, and positive valuations of body image. Content areas requiring more emphasis included persistent fatigue, competing demands, disclosure, anticipatory guidance, and age-specific concerns about body image/sexuality. Suggested improvements to program materials included portable observation logs, additional resources, more photographs of younger AA women, vivid colors, and images depicting strength. These findings provide the basis for program enhancements to increase the utility and cultural relevance of Taking CHARGE for AA survivors and underscore the importance of evaluating interventions for racially/ethnically diverse groups.

Determinants of colorectal cancer screening use, attempts, and non-use.

BACKGROUND: Relatively little is known about the experiences and preferences of users and those who attempt colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. This study describes factors influencing CRC screening decisions among users, attempters, attempter users (individuals who both attempted and completed at least one screening procedure), and non-users; identifies factors interfering with test completion; and describes correlates of screening preferences. METHODS: A primarily stratified random sample of patients from the University of Michigan Health System clinics, Ann Arbor, Michigan, with oversampling of FOBT attempters, completed a mailed questionnaire in fall, 2003. Descriptive and multivariate approaches evaluated factors influencing screening use and preferences. RESULTS: "Accuracy of results" was reported most often as important when deciding about CRC screening regardless of screening status. The importance of psychological decisional factors differed significantly by screening status (P<0.05). Among factors interfering with test completion, 38.5% attempting FOBT reported they "forgot" whereas 29.8% attempting colonoscopy were "afraid of pain." Approximately 56.3% indicated a preference for a CRC test: respondents who considered "discomfort" important preferred FOBT (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.87); those with a prior colonoscopy preferred an invasive test (OR: 6.50, 95% CI: 2.90, 14.50). CONCLUSIONS: To improve adherence to CRC screening recommendations, physicians should tailor discussions to patients' prior experiences and test-specific concerns and elicit preferences for screening.