Relative Bradycardia and Tachycardia and Their Associations with Adverse Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.

Background: Relative-tachycardia (RT), a phenomenon of unproportionately high heart-rate elevation in response to fever, has been previously attributed to unfavourable outcomes in severe-inflammatory-response-syndrome (SIRS). Relative heart-rate to body-temperature ratio (RHR) and its prognostic associations in patients with severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have not been investigated. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed heart-rate and body-temperature data at admission in patients who were hospitalized due to COVID-19 at a tertiary center from March 2020 to June 2021. After excluding patients with known heart rate affecting medications (beta-blockers and other antiarrhythmics) and atrial fibrillation, a total of 3490 patients were analyzed. Patients were divided into quartiles based on RHR on admission, with patients belonging to the 1st quartile designated as having relative-bradycardia (RB) and patients belonging to 4th quartile designated as having RT. Comparisons with baseline clinical characteristics and the course of treatment were done. Results: There were 57.5% male patients. Median age was 69 years. Most patients had severe or critical COVID-19 at admission. Median heart-rate at the time of hospital admission was 90/min, median body-temperature was 38 °C, and median RHR was 2.36 with interquartile-range 2.07-2.65. RB in comparison to middle-range RHR was significantly associated with older age, higher comorbidity burden, less severe COVID-19 and less pronounced inflammatory profile, and in comparison to RT additionally with higher frequency of hyperlipoproteinemia but lower frequency of obesity. RT in comparison to middle-range RHR was significantly associated with younger age, more severe COVID-19, lower comorbidity burden, lower frequency of arterial hypertension, higher frequency of diabetes mellitus, and more pronounced inflammatory profile. In multivariate analyses adjusted for clinically meaningful parameters, RB patients experienced more favorable survival compared to RT, whereas RT patients experienced higher mortality in comparison to RB and middle-range RHR patients, independently of older age, male sex, higher comorbidity burden and higher COVID-19 severity. Conclusions: Heart rate and axillary temperature are an indispensable part of a clinical exam, easy to measure, at effectively no cost. RT at admission, as a sign of excessive activation of the sympathetic nervous system, is independently associated with fatal outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

Incidence and risk factors for venous and arterial thromboses in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019: data on 4014 patients from a tertiary center registry.

AIM: To evaluate the burden and predictors of thromboembolic complications in a large real-life cohort of hospitalized patients with established coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 4014 consecutive adult patients admitted to a tertiary-level institution because of COVID-19 from March 2020 to March 2021 for the presence of venous and arterial thrombotic events. RESULTS: Venous-thromboembolic (VTE) events were present in 5.3% and arterial thrombotic events in 5.8% patients. The majority of arterial thromboses occurred before or on the day of admission, while the majority of VTE events occurred during hospitalization. The majority of both types of events occurred before intensive care unit (ICU) admission, although both types of events were associated with a higher need for ICU use and prolonged immobilization. In multivariate logistic regression, VTE events were independently associated with metastatic malignancy, known thrombophilia, lower mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, higher D-dimer, lower lactate dehydrogenase, longer duration of disease on admission, bilateral pneumonia, longer duration of hospitalization, and immobilization for at least one day. Arterial thromboses were independently associated with less severe COVID-19, higher Charlson comorbidity index, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, history of cerebrovascular insult, aspirin use, lower C reactive protein, better functional status on admission, ICU use, immobilization for at least one day, absence of hyperlipoproteinemia, and absence of metastatic malignancy. CONCLUSION: Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, venous and arterial thromboses differ in timing of presentation, association with COVID-19 severity, and other clinical characteristics.

Corticosteroid Dosing Level, Incidence and Profile of Bacterial Blood Stream Infections in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.

COVID-19 patients with severe or critical symptoms are often treated with corticosteroids, per contemporary guidelines. Due to their immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory properties, corticosteroids are associated with the development of superinfections. We aimed to retrospectively assess patterns of corticosteroid use and the profiles of bacterial blood stream infections associated with exposure to different dosing levels, in a cohort of 1558 real-life adult COVID-19 patients. A total of 1391 (89.3%) patients were treated with corticosteroids, with 710 (45.6%) patients receiving low, 539 (34.6%) high and 142 (9.1%) very high corticosteroid doses. Bacteremia developed in a total of 178 (11.4%) patients. The risk of bacteremia was of similar magnitude between the no and low-dose corticosteroid treatments (p = 0.352), whereas it progressively increased with high (OR 6.18, 95% CI (2.66-14.38), p < 0.001) and very high corticosteroid doses (OR 8.12, 95% CI (3.29-20.05), p < 0.001), compared to no corticosteroid treatment. These associations persisted after multivariate adjustments and were present independently of sex, comorbidity burden, and mechanical ventilation. The profiles of individual bacterial pathogens differed depending on the used corticosteroid doses. High and very high corticosteroid doses are frequently used for real-life COVID-19 patients with severe and critical clinical presentations and are associated with a higher risk of bacteremia independently of sex, comorbidity burden, and mechanical ventilation use.

Outcomes of Patients with Normal LDL-Cholesterol at Admission for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Lower Is Not Always Better.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There are few prospective data on the prognostic value of normal admission low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in statin-naïve patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) who are treated with a preemptive invasive strategy. We aimed to analyze the proportion of patients with normal LDL-C at admission for ACS in our practice, and their characteristics and clinical outcomes in comparison to patients with high admission LDL-C. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two institutions' prospective registries of patients with confirmed ACS from Jan 2017 to Jan 2023 were used to identify 1579 statin-naïve patients with no history of prior coronary artery disease (CAD), and with available LDL-C admission results, relevant clinical and procedural data, and short- and long-term follow-up data. Normal LDL-C at admission was defined as lower than 2.6 mmol/L. All demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were compared between patients with normal LDL-C and patients with a high LDL-C level (≥2.6 mmol/L) at admission. RESULTS: There were 242 (15%) patients with normal LDL-C at admission. In comparison to patients with high LDL-cholesterol at admission, they were significantly older (median 67 vs. 62 years) with worse renal function, had significantly more cases of diabetes mellitus (DM) (26% vs. 17%), peripheral artery disease (PAD) (14% vs. 9%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (8% vs. 2%), and psychological disorders requiring medical attention (19% vs. 10%). There were no significant differences in clinical type of ACS. Complexity of CAD estimated by coronary angiography was similar between the two groups (median Syntax score 12 for both groups). There were no significant differences in rates of complete revascularization (67% vs. 72%). Patients with normal LDL-C had significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at discharge (median LVEF 52% vs. 55%). Patients with normal LDL-C at admission had both significantly higher in-hospital mortality (5% vs. 2%, RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.08-3.96) and overall mortality during a median follow-up of 43 months (27% vs. 14%, RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.45-2.37). After adjusting for age, renal function, presence of diabetes mellitus, PAD, COPD, psychological disorders, BMI, and LVEF at discharge in a multivariate Cox regression analysis, normal LDL-C at admission remained significantly and independently associated with higher long-term mortality during follow-up (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.05-2.09). CONCLUSIONS: A spontaneously normal LDL-C level at admission for ACS in statin-naïve patients was not rare and it was an independent risk factor for both substantially higher in-hospital mortality and mortality during long-term follow-up. Patients with normal LDL-C and otherwise high total cardiovascular risk scores should be detected early and treated with optimal medical therapy. However, additional research is needed to reveal all the missing pieces in their survival puzzle after ACS-beyond coronary anatomy, PCI optimization, numerical LDL-C levels, and statin therapy.

Risks associated with prior oral anticoagulation use in hospitalized COVID-19 patients - A retrospective cohort study on 5392 patients from a tertiary centre.

INTRODUCTION: There are conflicting data on prior oral-anticoagulant (OAC) use and outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Due to uncertainties regarding associated risks with the prior OAC use, we have investigated this issue in a large cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients from our institution. METHODS: We have retrospectively evaluated a total of 5392 consecutive COVID-19 patients hospitalized in our tertiary center institution in period 3/2020 to 6/2021. Majority of patients received low-molecular-weight-heparin thromboprophylaxis and corticosteroids during hospitalization. Patients' characteristics and clinical outcomes were documented as a part of a hospital registry project and were evaluated according to the prior non-OAC, warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) use. RESULTS: Median age was 72 years, median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 4 points. There were 56.2% male patients. Majority of patients had severe (70.5%) or critical (15.8%) COVID-19 on admission. A total of 84.8% patients did not receive prior OAC, 9% were previously anticoagulated with warfarin and 6.2% were previously anticoagulated with DOACs. In the multivariate regression analyses, prior warfarin use was associated increased in-hospital mortality (OR 1.24, P = 0.048) independently of older age (OR 2.12, P < 0.001), male sex (OR 1.27, P < 0.001), higher CCI (OR 1.26, P < 0.001) and severe or critical COVID-19 on admission (OR 22.66, P < 0.001). Prior DOAC use was associated with higher occurrence of major bleeding (OR 1.72, P = 0.045) independently of higher CCI (OR 1.08, P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Prior OAC use could be associated with worse clinical outcomes during COVID-19 hospitalization. These phenomena might be OAC type specific and persist after multivariate adjustments.

Clinical and prognostic significance of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients : Data on 2309 patients from a tertiary center and validation in an independent cohort.

C­reactive protein (CRP) and albumin are inflammation sensitive parameters that are regulated by interleukin­6 inflammatory pathways. The CRP to albumin ratio (CAR) integrates these two into a potent clinical parameter whose clinical and prognostic association in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have not been well defined. We aimed to investigate the clinical and prognostic significance of CAR in the context of COVID-19 infection.We retrospectively analyzed 2309 consecutive COVID-19 patients hospitalized at a tertiary level hospital in the period from March 2020 to March 2021 who had baseline data for a CAR assessment. Findings were validated in an independent cohort of 1155 patients hospitalized from March 2021 to June 2021.The majority of patients (85.8%) had severe or critical COVID-19 on admission. Median CRP, albumin and CAR levels were 91 mg/L, 32 g/L and 2.92, respectively. Higher CAR was associated with a tendency for respiratory deterioration during hospitalization, increased requirement of high-flow oxygen treatment and mechanical ventilation, higher occurrence of bacteriemia, higher occurrence of deep venous thrombosis, lower occurrence of myocardial infarction, higher 30-day mortality and higher postdischarge mortality rates. We defined and validated four CAR prognostic categories (< 1.0, 1.0-2.9, 3.0-5.9 and ≥ 6.0) with distinct 30-day survival. In the series of multivariate Cox regression models we could demonstrate robust prognostic properties of CAR that was associated with inferior 30-day survival independently of COVID-19 severity, age and comorbidities and additionally independently of COVID-19 severity, CURB-65 and VACO index in both development and validation cohorts.The CAR seems to have a good potential to improve prognostication of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.