The Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: Results From the SUCCESS Consortium.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab (UST) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: This study used a retrospective, multicenter, multinational consortium of UST-treated CD patients. Data included patient demographics, disease phenotype, disease activity, treatment history, and concomitant medications. Cumulative rates of clinical, steroid-free, endoscopic, and radiographic remissions were assessed using time-to-event analysis, and clinical predictors were assessed by using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. Serious infections and adverse events were defined as those requiring hospitalization or treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 1,113 patients (51.8% female, 90% prior antitumor necrosis factor exposure) were included, with a median follow-up of 386 days. Cumulative rates of clinical, steroid-free, endoscopic, and radiographic remissions at 12 months were 40%, 32%, 39%, and 30%, respectively. Biologic-naive patients achieved significantly higher rates of clinical and endoscopic remissions at 63% and 55%, respectively. On multivariable analyses, prior antitumor necrosis factor (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.99) and vedolizumab exposure (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.88) were independently associated with lower likelihoods of achieving endoscopic remission. In patients who experienced loss of remission, 77 of 102 (75%) underwent dose optimization, and 44 of 77 (57%) achieved clinical response. An additional 152 of 681 patients (22.3%) were dose-optimized because of primary nonresponse incomplete response to UST, of whom 40.1% (61 of 152) responded. Serious infections occurred in 3.4% of patients while other noninfectious adverse events (lymphoma [n = 1], arthralgia [n = 6], rash [n = 6], headache [n = 3], hepatitis [n = 3], hair loss [n = 3], neuropathy [n = 1], and vasculitis [n = 1]) occurred in 2.4% of patients. DISCUSSION: UST represents a safe and effective treatment option for CD, with 40% of patients from a highly refractory cohort achieving clinical remission by 12 months. The greatest treatment effect of UST was seen in biologic-naive patients, and dose escalation may recapture clinical response.

Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Occurring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare and aggressive syndrome of excessive cytokine requiring prompt recognition and aggressive therapy. AIMS: We aimed to systematically characterize HLH in moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature (PubMED; EMBASE) and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Use of biologics was used as a surrogate definition for disease severity (consistent with usual and contemporary clinical management), to enable identification of rare HLH cases with the highest fidelity. RESULTS: 58 cases of HLH occurring in IBD patients are known (mean age: 26.0 years, 70% male, 83% with Crohn's disease, mean disease duration 7.0 years). 34.5% of patients were undergoing induction therapy at HLH diagnosis. All cases occurred on patients exposed to anti-TNF agents, but cases with anti-integrin or anti-IL-12/23 exposure were reported. 2/3 of cases did not report prior AZA/6MP exposure. Underlying opportunistic infection or lymphoma was found in > 80% of cases. Survival was 70% if promptly recognized and treated. Five patients restarted biologics after HLH resolved, and one patient developed recurrent HLH. CONCLUSIONS: HLH is rare among IBD patients exposed to biologic therapy. Most cases had an identifiable infection or malignancy at the time of diagnosis as well as history of immunomodulator use. Risk factors may include younger age, male gender, presence of Crohn's disease, and induction phase of treatment. Our study is not intended to assess risk of HLH with specific IBD therapies.

The management of the hospitalized ulcerative colitis patient: the medical-surgical conundrum.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review article, we address emerging evidence for the medical and surgical treatment of the hospitalized patient with ulcerative colitis. RECENT FINDINGS: Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving the colon and rectum. About one-fifth of patients will be hospitalized from ulcerative colitis, and about 20-30%, experiencing an acute flare will undergo colectomy. Because of the significant clinical consequences, patients hospitalized need prompt evaluation for potential complications, stratification of disease severity, and a multidisciplinary team approach to therapy, which involves both the gastroenterologist and surgeon. Although corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, second-line medical rescue options, primarily infliximab or cyclosporine, are considered within 3-5 days of presentation. In conjunction, an early surgical consultation to present the possibility of a staged proctocolectomy as one of the therapeutic options is equally important. SUMMARY: A coordinated multidisciplinary, individualized approach to treatment, involving the patient preferences throughout the process, is optimal in providing patient-centered effective care.

Systematic review: hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma on biologic therapy for inflammatory bowel disease, including data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

BACKGROUND: Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL) is a rare, poorly treatable malignancy associated with therapy for IBD. Current knowledge of HSTCL risk in IBD comes from an era of step-up therapy, before earlier use of biologics or combination therapy was advocated to achieve deep mucosal healing. HSTCL risk among newer biologic classes has also not been evaluated. AIMS: To systematically characterise the association of HSTCL with biologic therapy for IBD. METHODS: We conducted a literature search and query of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System to summarise HSTCL cases among IBD patients with prior biologic exposure. Demographics and immunosuppression exposure were extracted. Patients were stratified by current regimen (combination therapy, biologic monotherapy or no biologic), and biologic class (anti-TNF, anti-integrin, anti-interleukin 12/23). RESULTS: Sixty-two cases of HSTCL were identified from 2486 abstracts and 181 FDA Adverse Events Reporting System reports. The median age of affected patients was 28 years (range 12-81), and 83.6% were male, 84.7% had Crohn's disease. Five of 62 patients had no reported azathioprine/mercaptopurine exposure. Three patients within the cohort developed HSTCL after exposure to natalizumab, vedolizumab or ustekinumab; all three also had anti-TNF and azathioprine/mercaptopurine exposure. Forty-three of 49 (87.8%) patients with known outcomes died with a median survival of 5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with existing data, almost all identified HSTCL cases among IBD patients on biologic therapy had azathioprine/mercaptopurine exposure, and all cases on patients exposed to biologics had anti-TNF exposure. These data suggest initiating a patient-centred discussion before starting anti-TNF therapy or other biologics.