The impact of Boric Acid tubes on quantitative urinary bacterial cultures in hospitalized patients.

INTRODUCTION: The accuracy of urine culture results can be affected by pre-analytical factors such as transport delays and storage conditions. The objectives of this study were to analyze urine collection practices and assess the impact of introducing boric acid tubes for urine collection on quantitative urinary bacterial cultures of hospitalized patients in medical wards. METHODS: A quasi-experimental pre-post study conducted in an acute care facility. In the pre-intervention phase (2020-2021), urine samples were transported without preservatives at room temperature. In 2022 (post-intervention), we transitioned to boric acid transport tubes, evaluating its effect on significant bacterial growth (≥ 105 CFU/ml). Bivariate and multivariate analyses identified predictors of culture positivity. RESULTS: Throughout the duration of the study, a total of 12,660 urine cultures were analyzed. Date and time documentation was complete for 38.3% of specimens. Culture positivity was higher with longer processing times: positivity was 21.3% (220/1034) when specimens were processed within 4 h, 28.4% (955/3364) when processed in 4-24 h, and 32.9% (137/417) when processed after 24 h (p < 0.0001). For 4-24-hour processing, positivity decreased from 30.4% (704/2317) pre-intervention to 24.0% (251/1047) post-intervention (p < 0.001), with no significant changes in < 4 or ≥ 24-hour specimens. Stratified analysis by processing time revealed that the intervention was associated with reduced positivity only in cultures processed within 4-24 h (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.94; p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The introduction of boric acid transport tubes predominantly influenced cultures transported within a 4-24-hour window. This presents an opportunity to improve urine tract infection diagnostic practices in healthcare settings.

An Automated Insulin Delivery System with Automatic Meal Bolus Based on a Hand-Gesturing Algorithm.

Background: Carbohydrate counting (CC) and meal announcements, before eating, introduce a significant burden for individuals managing type 1 diabetes (T1D). An automated insulin delivery system with automatic bolusing that eliminates the need for CC and premeal bolusing (i.e., a hands-free closed-loop [HFCL] system) was assessed in a feasibility trial of adults with T1D. Methods: The system included the MiniMed™ 780G pump and a smartphone-paired smartwatch with the Klue application (Klue, Inc.) that detects eating and drinking gestures. A smartphone algorithm converted gestures into carb amounts that were transmitted to the pump for automatic bolusing. For 5 days, participants (N = 17, 18-75 years of age) used the system at home with meal announcements based on traditional CC, with the Klue application disabled (Home-stay phase). Thereafter, participants moved to a supervised hotel setting, where the Klue application was enabled for 5 days and meals were not announced (Hotel-stay phase). Participants consumed the same eight test meals (six solid and two liquid) of varying caloric and carb size at the same time and day of the week for both phases, and glycemic metrics were compared. Otherwise, there were no other meal restrictions. Results: The overall time in range (70-180 mg/dL) was 83.4% ± 7.0% and 80.6% ± 6.7% for the Home-stay and Hotel-stay, respectively (P = 0.08). The average time at <70 mg/dL was 3.1% and 3.0% (P = 0.9144), respectively, and the average time at >180 mg/dL was 13.5% and 16.3% (P = 0.1046), respectively. Postprandial glycemia following low-carb test meals was similar between the two phases. The system's ability to accommodate high-carb meals was somewhat limited. There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis. Conclusion: Preliminary findings show that a HFCL system was safe and maintained overall glycemic control, similar to that observed with traditional CC and manual meal bolusing. By eliminating these daily T1D burdens, a HFCL system may improve quality of life for individuals with T1D. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04964128.

Nivolumab, Pomalidomide, and Elotuzumab Combination Regimens for Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from the Phase 3 CheckMate 602 Study.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies suggest that combining nivolumab, a programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor, with pomalidomide/dexamethasone (Pd) with or without elotuzumab, an antisignaling lymphocytic activation molecule F7 monoclonal antibody, may improve multiple myeloma (MM) treatment efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The phase 3 CheckMate 602 study (NCT02726581) assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus pomalidomide/dexamethasone (NPd) and NPd plus elotuzumab (NE-Pd). Eligible patients (aged ≥ 18 years) had measurable MM after ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, that included an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and proteasome inhibitor (PI), each for ≥ 2 consecutive cycles, alone or combined, and were refractory to their last line of therapy. Patients were randomized 3:3:1 to receive NPd, Pd, or NE-Pd. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); overall response rate (ORR) was a key secondary endpoint. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 16.8 months, PFS was similar between treatment arms (Pd, 7.3 months [95% CI, 6.5-8.4]; NPd, 8.4 months [95% CI, 5.8-12.1]; NE-Pd, 6.3 months [95% CI, 2.4-11.1]). ORR was similar in the Pd (55%), NPd (48%), and NE-Pd (42%) arms. Nivolumab-containing arms were associated with a less favorable safety profile versus Pd, including a higher rate of thrombocytopenia (NPd, 25.0%; NE-Pd, 16.7%; Pd, 15.7%), any-grade immune-mediated adverse events (NPd, 13.9%; NE-Pd, 16.7%; Pd, 2.9%), and adverse events leading to discontinuation (NPd, 25.0%; NE-Pd, 33.3%; Pd, 18.6%). No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION: CheckMate 602 did not demonstrate clinical benefit of nivolumab (+/- elotuzumab) plus Pd versus Pd for patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM).

Clinical evaluation and determinants of response to HBI0101 (BCMA CART) therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

ABSTRACT: HBI0101 is an academic chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART)-targeted to B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM) and light chain amyloidosis. Herein, we present the phase 1b/2 results of 50 heavily pretreated patients with R/RMM dosed with 800 × 106 CART cells. Inclusion criteria were relatively permissive (i.e., performance status and baseline organ function) and consequently, approximately half of the enrolled patients would have been ineligible for pivotal clinical trials. The median time elapsed from patient enrollment until CART delivery was 25 days (range, 14-65). HBI0101-related toxicities included grade 1 to 3 cytokine release syndrome, grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities, and grade 1 to 2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. Responses were achieved in 90% of the patients, 56% achieved stringent and complete response, and 70% reached a minimal residual disease negativity. Within a median follow-up of 12.3 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2-14.6), and the overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 13.3 to not reached). Multivariable analysis on patient/disease and CART-related characteristics revealed that high-risk cytogenetic, extramedullary disease, and increased number of effector-memory T cells in CART products were independently associated with inferior PFS. In conclusion, comprehensive analyses of the parameters affecting the response to CART therapy are essential for improving patients' outcome. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04720313.

Impact of intensified prevention measures on the rate of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased rates of hospital-acquired infections. During the early months of the pandemic, we observed high rates of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSIs) among COVID-19 patients, prompting the implementation of intensified prevention measures. Objectives: To assess the prevalence of HA-BSI among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, identify risk factors, and evaluate the effect of prevention measures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective matched case-control study in adult medical step-up units between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. We matched mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients with ventilated non-COVID-19 patients based on age group and length of stay before ventilation. In response to the high rates of HA-BSI among COVID-19 patients, a comprehensive infection control intervention was implemented. Results: A total of 136 COVID-19 patients were matched with 136 non-COVID-19 patients. No significant differences were observed in pre-hospitalization characteristics. The central venous catheter utilization ratio was higher in COVID-19 patients (83.6%) versus 35.6% in the control group (p < 0.001). During pre-intervention, 35.2% (32/91) of COVID-19 patients developed HA-BSI, compared to 17.8% (13/73) in the control group (p < 0.001). Following the intervention, no significant difference was observed between the groups (17.8% (8/45) versus 15.9% (10 /63), p = 0.79). In a multivariate analysis, HA-BSI was associated with low body mass index (OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.9-1.0), p = 0.015)) and presence of temporary dialysis catheter (OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.0-7.3), p = 0.05)). Conclusions: Mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients were at higher risk for developing HA-BSI compared to non-COVID-19 patients. Intensified prevention measures were associated with decreased rates of HA-BSI.