Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Colorectal Dis ; 23(3): 710-715, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32894636

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether the paradigm of surgical intervention for faecal incontinence (FI) has changed between 2000 and 2013. METHOD: This was a multi-centre retrospective study of patients who had undergone either sacral neuromodulation (SNM) or delayed sphincter repair or sphincteroplasty (SR) as a primary surgical intervention for FI in five centres in Europe and one in the United States. The flow of patients according to the intervention, sustainability of the treatment at a minimum follow-up of 5 years, complications and requirement for further interventions were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 461 patients (median age 56 years, range 24-90 years, 41 men) had either SNM or SR as an index operation during the study period [SNM 284 (61.6%), SR 177 (38.4%)]. Among SNM patients, there were 169 revisional operations (change of battery and/or lead, re-siting or removal). At the time of last follow-up 203 patients (71.4%) continued to use SNM. Among SR patients, 30 (16.9%) had complications, most notably wound infection (22, 12.4%). During follow-up 32 patients (18.1%) crossed over to SNM. Comparing two 4-year periods (2000-2003 and 2007-2010), the proportion of patients operated on who had a circumferential sphincter defect of less than 90° was 48 (68%) and 45 (46%), respectively (P = 0.03), while those who had SNM as the primary intervention increased from 29% to 89% (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The paradigm of surgical intervention for FI has changed with increasing use of SNM.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Incontinência Fecal , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Incontinência Fecal/cirurgia , Humanos , Plexo Lombossacral , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Colorectal Dis ; 10(2): 144-50, 2008 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17302914

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Controversy surrounds the optimal surgical management of the distal rectal remnant during colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) and the potential benefit from the placement of a rectal catheter for remnant drainage. This study reviews the clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone colectomy for UC with intra-peritoneal closure of the rectal remnant. METHOD: Analysis of prospective data lodged on Lothian Surgical Audit databases from patients treated in a tertiary coloproctology unit over 11 years. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-nine patients were identified, the mean age was 41.9 years, 63% were men. Failure of maximal medical therapy necessitated surgery for 78.1% patients, while 12.6% had acute perforation and 11.9% had toxic megacolon. Complications included five (3.1%) stump dehiscences, eight (5.0%) intra-abdominal/pelvic collections, four (2.5%) significant wound infections, three (1.9%) small bowel obstructions and three (1.9%) deaths. Within the follow-up period, 62.3% patients had an ileo-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA), 7.5% patients had a completion proctectomy, 10.1% patients within the series had a retained rectal remnant after 1 year follow up, the remaining patients had less than 1 year follow up. CONCLUSION: The intra-peritoneal rectal stump following colectomy for UC is associated with low rates of pelvic sepsis and a high proportion of patients successfully proceeding to IPAA.


Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Colite Ulcerativa/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Drenagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Proctocolectomia Restauradora , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA