Gradual withdrawal of remifentanil infusion may prevent opioid-induced hyperalgesia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine if gradual withdrawal of remifentanil infusion prevented opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) as opposed to abrupt withdrawal. OIH duration was also evaluated. METHODS: Nineteen volunteers were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study. All went through three sessions: abrupt or gradual withdrawal of remifentanil infusion and placebo. Remifentanil was administered at 2.5 ng ml(-1) for 30 min before abrupt withdrawal or gradual withdrawal by 0.6 ng ml(-1) every five min. Pain was assessed at baseline, during infusion, 45-50 min and 105-110 min after end of infusions using the heat pain test (HPT) and the cold pressor test (CPT). RESULTS: The HPT 45 min after infusion indicated OIH development in the abrupt withdrawal session with higher pain scores compared with the gradual withdrawal and placebo sessions (both P<0.01. Marginal mean scores: placebo 2.90; abrupt 3.39; gradual 2.88), but no OIH after gradual withdrawal compared with placebo (P=0.93). In the CPT 50 min after end of infusion there was OIH in both remifentanil sessions compared with placebo (gradual P=0.01, abrupt P<0.01. Marginal mean scores: placebo 4.56; abrupt 5.25; gradual 5.04). There were no differences between the three sessions 105-110 min after infusion. CONCLUSIONS: We found no development of OIH after gradual withdrawal of remifentanil infusion in the HPT. After abrupt withdrawal OIH was present in the HPT. In the CPT there was OIH after both gradual and abrupt withdrawal of infusion. The duration of OIH was less than 105 min for both pain modalities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT 01702389. EudraCT number 2011-002734-39.

A comparison of oxycodone prolonged-release vs. oxycodone + naloxone prolonged-release after laparoscopic hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Targiniq®, an oxycodone prolonged-release (PR) formulation combined with the opioid antagonist naloxone PR, aims to prevent opioid-induced constipation without impairing the analgesic efficacy. This has been confirmed during prolonged use in chronic pain or cancer patients. The purpose of our study was to compare clinical effects of oxycodone PR with oxycodone PR + naloxone PR for short-term post-operative pain management. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, prospective study included 85 women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. The two groups received either oxycodone PR 10 mg or oxycodone PR 10 mg + naloxone PR 5 mg as pre-medication and twice daily for 3 days. As rescue analgesic, the patients received oxycodone intravenous during the first 24 h post-operatively and oxycodone tablets in the 24-72-h period. Constipation, other side effects, pain and satisfaction were registered during the first 7 post-operative days. RESULTS: Demographic, pre- and perioperative variables and the use of rescue analgesics were similar in the groups. There were no significant differences in variables related to constipation. In the oxycodone PR + naloxone PR group, 25% had no defecation during the first 72 h post-operatively, compared with 20% in the oxycodone PR group (mean 1.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.1 ± 2.4 defecations). Other opioid-induced effects and side effects showed no significant differences. Only 7% were dissatisfied with their oral pain treatment. CONCLUSION: Addition of naloxone to oxycodone PR tablets in a pain regimen administered twice daily the first three post-operative days had no significant clinical effects on constipation or other variables during the first week after hysterectomy.