How does the introduction of free GP care for children impact on GP service provision? A qualitative study of GPs.

BACKGROUND: Optimising child health in general practice is a key health service priority. In Ireland, where 23% of Ireland's population are aged under 16, GP consultations have historically involved a private fee or have been covered by Ireland's General Medical Services (GMS) scheme. In July 2015, this scheme was expanded so that free GP care was provided to all children aged under 6 years. Recent research suggests this change in policy has led to a substantial increase in the number of children under six attending both daytime and out-of-hour GP services and highlights a need to better understand the perspectives of GPs on this policy change. AIM: To address these knowledge gaps, this paper aims to examine GPs' views on the scheme and how it has impacted on their practice. METHODS: Sixteen GPs participated in semi-structured telephone interviews between June and August 2016, analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Six key themes were identified: (1) increased service utilisation, (2) changes in parental behaviour when accessing services, (3) increased 'out of hours' service utilisation, (4) dissatisfaction with the current resourcing of the scheme, (5) limited capacity to support expansion of free GP care, and (6) reduced antibiotic prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights how introducing free GP care to a mixed private/publicly funded health system may impact on GP workload, parents' interaction with services and physician practice.

An evaluation of pregnant women's knowledge and attitudes about newborn bloodspot screening.

OBJECTIVES: research suggests that information provided to parents about newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) can be inconsistent. The majority of international NBS programmes recommend that parents should receive information about NBS in the antenatal period, however prior studies have mostly focused on postnatal women's knowledge, with no quantitative study of women's knowledge in the antenatal period conducted to date. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine if antenatal women received information about NBS in the antenatal period and to evaluate their knowledge and attitudes about NBS. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: we conducted a cross-sectional study among antenatal attendees at three maternity hospitals in Ireland. A total of 662 antenatal women (≥36 weeks gestation) were recruited into the study (279 primiparous, 368 multiparous). Women were asked to complete a self reported knowledge and attitude questionnaire about NBS. FINDINGS: primiparity (OR 2.75; 95% CI 1.65, 4.59) lower educational status (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.02, 3.15) and not having private health insurance (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.19, 2.85) were independently associated with poor NBS knowledge. Fourteen per cent of antenatal women recalled receiving an information leaflet about NBS, yet over 87 % reported that they would like more information. Thirty four per cent of women agreed that they understand everything they need to know about NBS. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: the process of providing women with information about NBS in the antenatal period is inconsistent; consequently their awareness about NBS is limited. To make an informed choice about NBS women require information to be provided in a more structured format. There are many missed opportunities in the antenatal period for maternity care providers to provide women with information about NBS. Our study recommends that healthcare providers should have a more formal and structured approach with regard to the provision of information about NBS in the antenatal period. This could be achieved by incorporating NBS education into antenatal education classes or through multimedia while women are waiting in the antenatal clinic. Healthcare providers may need education about the importance and benefits of providing women with information about NBS in the antenatal period.