What predicts quality of life after subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) is an effective therapy against medication-refractory motor complications in patients with Parkinson's disease. However, it remains difficult to predict which baseline patient characteristics are associated with quality of life (QoL) after surgery. The objective was to identify preoperative factors associated with QoL after STN DBS by systematically reviewing publications of sufficient methodological quality. METHODS: Main databases were systematically searched up to March 2019 to identify studies that investigated factors associated with QoL after STN DBS in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. RESULTS: In all, 869 studies were identified, of which 18 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Higher QoL after DBS appears to be associated with a large preoperative difference between ON and OFF motor function in some studies, although there was no clear association of severity of motor function or motor complications with postoperative QoL. Lower severity of dyskinesias was associated with greater postoperative QoL improvement but has been insufficiently studied. Higher baseline QoL was suggestive of higher postoperative QoL. Four studies suggested that older age at surgery is associated with a lower improvement, although six other studies reported no association. No or limited evidence was found for cognitive impairment or psychiatric dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Various relative contraindications for STN DBS such as cognitive impairment and psychiatric dysfunction appear to be unrelated to postoperative QoL. However, the lack of clear correlations with disease-related variables suggests that QoL may be individually influenced by other factors, indicating that an ideal preoperative patient profile with regard to QoL improvement cannot be readily provided.

Management of dystonia in Europe: a survey of the European network for the study of the dystonia syndromes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dystonia is difficult to recognize due to its large phenomenological complexity. Thus, the use of experts in dystonia is essential for better recognition and management of dystonia syndromes (DS). Our aim was to document managing strategies, facilities and expertise available in various European countries in order to identify which measures should be implemented to improve the management of DS. METHODS: A survey was conducted, funded by the Cooperation in Science and Technology, via the management committee of the European network for the study of DS, which is formed from representatives of the 24 countries involved. RESULTS: Lack of specific training in dystonia by general neurologists, general practitioners as well as other allied health professionals was universal in all countries surveyed. Genetic testing for rare dystonia mutations is not readily available in a significant number of countries and neurophysiological studies are difficult to perform due to a lack of experts in this field of movement disorders. Tetrabenazine is only readily available for treatment of dystonia in half of the surveyed countries. Deep brain stimulation is available in three-quarters of the countries, but other surgical procedures are only available in one-quarter of countries. CONCLUSIONS: Internationally, collaboration in training, advanced diagnosis, treatment and research of DS and, locally, in each country the creation of multidisciplinary teams for the management of dystonia patients could provide the basis for improving all aspects of dystonia management across Europe.

A multicenter double-blind randomized crossover study comparing the impact of dorsal subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation versus standard care on apathy in Parkinson's disease: a study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Neuroimaging studies suggest an association between apathy after deep brain stimulation (DBS) and stimulation of the ventral part of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) due to the associative fibers connected to the non-motor limbic circuits that are involved in emotion regulation and motivation. We have previously described three patients with severe apathy that could be fully treated after switching stimulation from a ventral electrode contact point to a more dorsal contact point. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether more dorsal stimulation of the STN decreases apathy compared to standard care in a multicenter randomized controlled trial with a crossover design. METHODS: We will include 26 patients with a Starkstein Apathy Scale (SAS) score of 14 or more after subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for refractory Parkinson's disease. This is a multicenter trial conducted in two teaching hospitals and one university medical center in the Netherlands after at least 3 months of STN DBS. Our intervention will consist of 1 month of unilateral dorsal STN stimulation compared to treatment as usual. The primary outcome is a change in SAS score following 1 month of DBS on the original contact compared to the SAS score following 1 month of DBS on the more dorsal contact. Secondary outcomes are symptom changes on the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor part III, Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, 39-item Parkinson's disease questionnaire, Parkinson's disease impulsive-compulsive disorders questionnaire, changes in levodopa-equivalent daily dosage, apathy rated by the caregiver, and burden and quality of life of the caregiver. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NL8279. Registered on January 10, 2020.

Machine learning for automated EEG-based biomarkers of cognitive impairment during Deep Brain Stimulation screening in patients with Parkinson's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: A downside of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's Disease (PD) is that cognitive function may deteriorate postoperatively. Electroencephalography (EEG) was explored as biomarker of cognition using a Machine Learning (ML) pipeline. METHODS: A fully automated ML pipeline was applied to 112 PD patients, taking EEG time-series as input and predicted class-labels as output. The most extreme cognitive scores were selected for class differentiation, i.e. best vs. worst cognitive performance (n = 20 per group). 16,674 features were extracted per patient; feature-selection was performed using a Boruta algorithm. A random forest classifier was modelled; 10-fold cross-validation with Bayesian optimization was performed to ensure generalizability. The predicted class-probabilities of the entire cohort were compared to actual cognitive performance. RESULTS: Both groups were differentiated with a mean accuracy of 0.92; using only occipital peak frequency yielded an accuracy of 0.67. Class-probabilities and actual cognitive performance were negatively linearly correlated (ß = -0.23 (95% confidence interval (-0.29, -0.18))). CONCLUSIONS: Particularly high accuracies were achieved using a compound of automatically extracted EEG biomarkers to classify PD patients according to cognition, rather than a single spectral EEG feature. SIGNIFICANCE: Automated EEG assessment may have utility for cognitive profiling of PD patients during the DBS screening.

Deep brain stimulation for dystonia: patient selection and outcomes.

In a literature survey, 341 patients with primary and 109 with secondary dystonias treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) were identified. In general, the outcomes for primary dystonias were more favourable compared to the secondary forms. For some secondary dystonias--like tardive dystonia, myoclonus-dystonia (M-D), NBIA (PANK2), the outcome was very good. Only for the primary generalized dystonias, the efficacy of GPi-DBS has been confirmed in randomised controlled trials. Predictors of outcome are the experience and dedication of the stereotactic team, the selection of patients--the diagnosis and pre-operative screening--and the quality of the post-operative care. Predictors of negative outcome are long duration of the disease--with contractures or scoliosis--and concomitant symptoms like spasticity and cerebellar dysfunction. More studies are required to establish the role of GPi-DBS in the treatment of secondary dystonias.

Selecting candidates for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's disease: the role of patients' expectations.

Patients with advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) may be eligible for Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in case of medication-related motor fluctuations or tremor refractory to oral medication. However, several PD symptoms are unresponsive to DBS and constitute relative contra-indications for DBS. Patients referred for DBS undergo an eligibility screening during which motor functioning and contra-indications for surgery are assessed. During this pre-screening the potential benefits and drawbacks of surgery are discussed, together with patients' expectations of the results of DBS. Unrealistic expectations on the benefits of DBS may contribute to reduced patient satisfaction and poor clinical outcomes after surgery. The aim of this multicenter study (289 patients) was to assess the reasons for rejection after an outpatient-based pre-screening visit for DBS referrals, with particular emphasis on the role of patient expectations of DBS. The most frequent reason contributing to rejection was suboptimal oral treatment or satisfying symptom-control with oral medication (50% of rejections). Unrealistic expectations were identified in 38% of rejected patients and were the singular reason for rejection in 4%. Incorporating the assessment of unrealistic expectations increased the accuracy (Area Under the Curve) of determining DBS eligibility from 0.92 ((95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.88-0.97) to 0.97 (95%CI 0.96-0.99). Patients' expectations of DBS are easily checked, and better education of patients and treating neurologists with regard to unrealistic expectations of this procedure may improve efficiency of referrals and avoid unnecessary stress and disappointments during screening.

Intraoperative test stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus aids postoperative programming of chronic stimulation settings in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether intraoperative testing during awake Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) can be used to postoperatively identify the best settings for chronic stimulation. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intraoperative test stimulation is indicative of postoperative stimulation results. METHODS: Records of consecutive Parkinson's Disease patients who received STN DBS between September 2012 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The best depth identified after intraoperative stimulation via the microelectrode's stimulation tip was compared with the depth of the contact selected for chronic stimulation after a standard monopolar contact review. Moreover, thresholds for induction of clinical effects (optimal improvement of rigidity and induction of side-effects) were compared between stimulation at the postoperatively selected contact and at the corresponding intraoperative depth. RESULTS: Records of 119 patients were analyzed (mean (SD) age 60.5 (6.5) years, 31.9% female, 238 STNs). In 75% of cases, the postoperatively selected contact corresponded with the intraoperative depth with the largest therapeutic window or was immediately dorsal to it. Higher stimulation intensities were required postoperatively than intraoperatively to relieve rigidity (p = 0.002) and induce capsular side-effects (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: In the majority of cases, the postoperative contact for chronic stimulation was at a similar level or immediately dorsal with respect to the identified best intraoperative depth. Postoperatively, relief of rigidity and induction of capsular side-effects occur at higher stimulation intensities than during intraoperative test stimulation.

Stimulation challenge test after STN DBS improves satisfaction in Parkinson's disease patients.

OBJECTIVE: Although subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation (STN DBS) is proven effective in improving symptoms of Parkinson's Disease (PD), previous literature demonstrates a discrepancy between objective improvement and patients' perception thereof. We aimed to examine whether postoperative stimulation challenge tests (SCT) alters patients' satisfaction after STN DBS for PD. METHODS: Fifty-four PD patients underwent preoperative levodopa challenge tests and were routinely invited for SCT 1-2 years postoperatively. SEverity of predominantly Nondopaminergic Symptoms in PD (SENS-PD) scores quantified non-dopaminergic disease severity. Motor functioning was quantified using Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III scores; a ratio between conditions ON and OFF (preoperative Med-ON vs. Med-OFF, and postoperative Med-ON/Stim-ON vs. Med-OFF/Stim-OFF) reflected treatment benefit. 'Global Impression of Change' (GIC) and 'Global Satisfaction with Surgery' (GSS) Likert scales were filled out before and immediately after SCT. RESULTS: Postoperative Med-ON/Stim-ON severity was lower than preoperative ON severity. Disease severity scores were not different between assessments. GIC and GSS scores were higher after SCT versus before (GIC: Z = -3.80, r = 0.37, subjects indicating maximum scores before SCT: 32.1%, after SCT: 57.1%; GSS: Z = -3.69, r = 0.35, maximum scores before SCT: 25.0%, after SCT: 46.4%). Higher non-dopaminergic disease severity was associated with lower GIC and GSS scores (GIC: OR 1.2 (95%CI 1.0-1.3); GSS: OR 1.2 (95%CI 1.1-1.3), while motor-scores and magnitude of DBS-effects were not. CONCLUSION: SCT improves patients' satisfaction and is recommended especially in case of suboptimal subjective valuations. This information should be considered in clinical practice and in the context of clinical trials.

Cognitive outcome 5 years after bilateral chronic stimulation of subthalamic nucleus in patients with Parkinson's disease.

AIM: To assess the long-term cognitive and behavioural outcome after bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients affected by Parkinson's disease, with a 5-year follow-up after surgery. METHODS: 11 patients with Parkinson's disease treated by bilateral DBS of STN underwent cognitive and behavioural assessments before implantation, and 1 and 5 years after surgery. Postoperative cognitive assessments were carried out with stimulators turned on. RESULTS: A year after surgery, there was a marginally significant decline on a letter verbal fluency task (p = 0.045) and a significant improvement on Mini-Mental State Examination (p = 0.009). 5 years after surgery, a significant decline was observed on a letter verbal fluency task (p = 0.007) and an abstract reasoning task (p = 0.009), namely Raven's Progressive Matrices 1947. No significant postoperative change was observed on other cognitive variables. No patient developed dementia 5 years after surgery. A few days after the implantation, two patients developed transient manic symptoms with hypersexuality and one patient developed persistent apathy. CONCLUSION: The decline of verbal fluency observed 5 years after implantation for DBS in STN did not have a clinically meaningful effect on daily living activities in our patients with Parkinson's disease. As no patient developed global cognitive deterioration in our sample, these findings suggest that DBS of STN is associated with a low cognitive and behavioural morbidity over a 5-year follow-up, when selection criteria for neurosurgery are strict.

Sensory integration in writer's cramp: comparison with controls and evaluation of botulinum toxin effect.

OBJECTIVE: Abnormal temporal and spatial sensory integration have been described in mixed groups of dystonic patients. We tested somatosensory integration and the effect of botulinum toxin (BoNT) in patients with writer's cramp (WC). METHODS: Median and ulnar SEPs were recorded in 29 WC patients and in 10 controls. We performed: individual and simultaneous stimulation of median and ulnar nerves (MU) and paired stimulation of median nerve at interstimulus-interval (ISI) of 40 and 100 ms. All the trials were repeated after blinded randomized treatment with placebo or BoNT-A. RESULTS: We found no differences between patients and controls in standard SEPs. Spatial (except for N9) and temporal suppression after ISI 40 were present in both groups for all the waves; after ISI 100, suppression was present only for N70. There were no differences between patients and controls. After BoNT-A treatment, no changes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with previous findings in heterogeneous dystonic groups, and although some studies suggest impairment of spatial and temporal sensory discrimination in patients with focal dystonia, in our large cohort of patients with WC we found no evidence of abnormal somatosensory integration investigated by means of SEPs and no changes in somatosensory variables after BoNT-A treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings may suggest pathophysiological differences between focal and generalized dystonia, and may also point to an inferior sensitivity of SEPs in detecting abnormalities in sensory discrimination as compared to methods based on subjective discrimination.

Spasticity, dyskinesia and ataxia in cerebral palsy: Are we sure we can differentiate them?

OBJECTIVE: Cerebral palsy (CP) can be classified as spastic, dyskinetic, ataxic or combined. Correct classification is essential for symptom-targeted treatment. This study aimed to investigate agreement among professionals on the phenotype of children with CP based on standardized videos. METHODS: In a prospective, observational pilot study, videos of fifteen CP patients (8 boys, mean age 11 ± 5 y) were rated by three pediatric neurologists, three rehabilitation physicians and three movement disorder specialists. They scored the presence and severity of spasticity, ataxia or dyskinesias/dystonia. Inter- and intraobserver agreement were calculated using Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa. RESULTS: We found a fair inter-observer (κ = 0.36) and moderate intra-observer agreement (κ = 0.51) for the predominant motor symptom. This only slightly differed within the three groups of specialists (κ = 0.33-0.55). CONCLUSION: A large variability in the phenotyping of CP children was detected, not only between but also within clinicians, calling for a discussing on the operational definitions of spasticity, dystonia and ataxia. In addition, the low agreement found in our study questions the reliability of use of videos to measure intervention outcomes, such as deep brain stimulation in dystonic CP. Future studies should include functional domains to assess the true impact of management options in this highly challenging patient population.

Bilateral deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a multicentre study with 4 years follow-up.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is associated with significant improvement of motor complications in patients with severe Parkinson's disease after some 6-12 months of treatment. Long-term results in a large number of patients have been reported only from a single study centre. We report 69 Parkinson's disease patients treated with bilateral DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN, n = 49) or globus pallidus internus (GPi, n = 20) included in a multicentre study. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at 1 year and 3-4 years after surgery. The primary outcome measure was the change in the 'off' medication score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor part (UPDRS-III) at 3-4 years. Stimulation of the STN or GPi induced a significant improvement (50 and 39%; P < 0.0001) of the 'off' medication UPDRS-III score at 3-4 years with respect to baseline. Stimulation improved cardinal features and activities of daily living (ADL) (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.02 for STN and GPi, respectively) and prolonged the 'on' time spent with good mobility without dyskinesias (P < 0.00001). Daily dosage of levodopa was significantly reduced (35%) in the STN-treated group only (P < 0.001). Comparison of the improvement induced by stimulation at 1 year with 3-4 years showed a significant worsening in the 'on' medication motor states of the UPDRS-III, ADL and gait in both STN and GPi groups, and speech and postural stability in the STN-treated group. Adverse events (AEs) included cognitive decline, speech difficulty, instability, gait disorders and depression. These were more common in patients treated with DBS of the STN. No patient abandoned treatment as a result of these side effects. This experience, which represents the first multicentre study assessing the long-term efficacy of either STN or GPi stimulation, shows a significant and substantial clinically important therapeutic benefit for at least 3-4 years in a large cohort of patients with severe Parkinson's disease.

Directional Recording of Subthalamic Spectral Power Densities in Parkinson's Disease and the Effect of Steering Deep Brain Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: A new 32-contacts deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead, capable of directionally steering stimulation, was tested intraoperatively. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to perform recordings from the multidirectional contacts and to investigate the effect of directional current steering on the local field potentials (LFPs). METHODS: In eight patients with Parkinson's disease, after standard microelectrode recording and clinical testing, the new lead was temporarily implanted. The 32-channel LFP recordings were measured simultaneously at different depths and directions before and after directional stimulation. RESULTS: The spatial distribution of LFPs power spectral densities across the contact array at baseline marked the borders of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) with a significant increase in beta power and with a mean accuracy of approximately 0.6 mm in four patients.The power in the 18.5-30 Hz frequency band varied across different directions in all patients. In the three cases that showed improvement of rigidity, this was higher when current was steered toward the direction with the highest LFP power in the beta band. Subthalamic LFPs in six patients showed a differential frequency-dependent suppression/enhancement of the oscillatory activity in the 10-45 Hz frequency band after four different 'steering' modes as compared to ring mode, suggesting a higher specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Through a new 32-contact DBS lead it is possible to record simultaneous subthalamic LFPs at different depths and directions, providing confirmation of adequate lead placement and multidirectional spatial-temporal information potentially related to pathological subthalamic electrical activity and to the effect of stimulation. Although further research is needed, this may improve the efficiency of steering stimulation.

Long-term follow up of subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Twenty-two patients with PD received bilateral implants for high frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. The patients were treated for more than 1 year (up to 36 months). At the last visit, the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score without medication improved by 50.2% (p < 0.001) and the UPDRS activities of daily living score improved by 68.4% (p < 0.001). The most common long-lasting adverse events were hypophonia and dysarthria; transient events were increased sexuality and mania. The surgical procedure induced transient intraoperative psychosis in seven patients.

Bilateral high frequency subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease: long-term neurological follow-up.

AIM: High frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is gaining recognition as a new symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). The first available long-term observations show the stability of the efficacy of this procedure in time. METHODS: Quadripolar leads were implanted bilaterally under stereotactic conditions in the STN of patients with advanced PD. High frequency stimulation was applied for 24 hours a day. Following implant, antiparkinsonian medication was reduced as much as possible and stimulation was gradually increased. The patients were evaluated in the practically defined "off" condition and in the "on" condition using the unified PD rating scale (UPDRS) and the Schwab & England scale. Neuropsychological testing was performed before and after the implant. Thirty-three patients were followed up for at least 3 months and 13 among them until 36 months. RESULTS: The patients had a mean age of 56.8+/-7.1 years and a mean disease duration of 13.8+/-5.5 years; they were followed-up for an average of 25.7+/-13.5 months. At the time of the last available visit, the stimulation amplitude was 2.47+/-0.40 V (the total energy delivered averaged 1.57+/-0.8 microW). The levodopa-equivalent daily dose was reduced by 56.2% (p<0.001). Parkinsonian features were improved in all patients, the greatest changes were seen for tremor, gait, bradykinesia and postural stability, then rigidity and limb akinesia. Compared with the pre-implant conditions, the UPDRS motor score in the "off" condition was improved by 51.6% at the time of the last visit (p<0.001), the UPDRS activities of daily living score was improved by 68.5% (p<0.001), the Schwab & England scale was improved by 196.8% (p<0.001). The neuropsychological data did not show significant changes. Night sleep improved in all patients, due to increased mobility at night. In almost all patients insomnia was resolved. All patients gained weight after surgery with an increase of 11.1% (p<0.001) compared to their pre-implant weight. The most common permanent side effects consisted in hypophonia and dysarthria, transient side effects were increased sexuality and mania, the most common side effects related to stimulation were ballic or choreic dyskinesias. The most common adverse event related to the surgical procedure was transient psychosis; unexplained switching-off of the stimulator was the most common device-related effect. CONCLUSION: This study extends our recently published 3-years FU series. It confirms again that symptomatic efficacy of STN stimulation is retained during the 2(nd) and 3(rd) years following the implant, without any obvious decay of efficacy or need for increase of energy delivered. Improvement of dyskinesias also persists and the procedure is well tolerated. Side effects and adverse events are sometimes severe, but can be managed in most cases. The improvement of daily living activities outweighs by far the motor benefit, indicating that the use of this procedure significantly improves the patients' lifestyle.

Functional neuronal activity and connectivity within the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: Characterization of the functional neuronal activity and connectivity within the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Single units were extracted from micro-electrode recording (MER) of 18 PD patients who underwent STN deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. The firing rate and pattern of simultaneously recorded spike trains and their coherence were analyzed. To provide a precise functional assignment of position to the observed activities, for each patient we mapped its classified multichannel STN MERs to a generic atlas representation with a sensorimotor part and a remaining part. RESULTS: Within the sensorimotor part we found significantly higher mean firing rate (P < 0.05) and significantly more burst-like activity (P < 0.05) than within the remaining part. The proportion of significant coherence in the beta band (13-30 Hz) is significantly higher in the sensorimotor part of the STN than elsewhere (P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: The STN sensorimotor part distinguishes itself from the remaining part with respect to beta coherence, firing rate and burst-like activity and postoperatively was found as the preferred target area. SIGNIFICANCE: Our firing behavior analysis may help to discriminate the STN sensorimotor part for the placement of the DBS electrode.

How to tackle tremor - systematic review of the literature and diagnostic work-up.

BACKGROUND: Tremor is the most prevalent movement disorder in clinical practice. It is defined as involuntary, rhythmic, oscillatory movements. The diagnostic process of patients with tremor can be laborious and challenging, and a clear, systematic overview of available diagnostic techniques is lacking. Tremor can be a symptom of many diseases, but can also represent a distinct disease entity. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to give a clear, systematic and step-wise overview of the diagnostic work-up of a patient with tremor. The clinical relevance and value of available laboratory tests in patients with tremor will be explored. METHODS: We systematically searched through EMBASE. The retrieved articles were supplemented by articles containing relevant data or provided important background information. Studies that were included investigated the value and/or usability of diagnostic tests for tremor. RESULTS: In most patients, history and clinical examination by an experienced movement disorders neurologist are sufficient to establish a correct diagnosis, and further ancillary examinations will not be needed. Ancillary investigation should always be guided by tremor type(s) present and other associated signs and symptoms. The main ancillary examination techniques currently are electromyography and SPECT imaging. Unfortunately, many techniques have not been studied in large prospective, diagnostic studies to be able to determine important variables like sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: When encountering a patient with tremor, history, and careful clinical examination should guide the diagnostic process. Adherence to the diagnostic work-up provided in this review will help the diagnostic process of these patients.

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Pallidum is Effective and Might Stabilize Striatal D(2) Receptor Binding in Myoclonus-Dystonia.

PURPOSE: To assess clinical efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the pallidum in Myoclonus-Dystonia (M-D) patients, and to compare pre- and post-operative striatal dopamine D2 receptor availability. METHODS: Clinical parameters were scored using validated rating scales for myoclonus and dystonia. Dopamine D2 receptor binding of three patients was studied before surgery and approximately 2 years post-operatively using 123-I-iodobenzamide Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography. Two patients who did not undergo surgery served as controls. RESULTS: Clinically, the three M-D patients improved 83, 17, and 100%, respectively on the myoclonus rating scale and 78, 23, and 65% on the dystonia rating scale after DBS. Dopamine D2 receptor binding did not change after surgery. In the two control subjects, binding has lowered further. CONCLUSION: These findings confirm that DBS of the pallidum has beneficial effects on motor symptoms in M-D and suggest this procedure might stabilize dopamine D2 receptor binding.